We were, had a home visit back in March but doesn't look like it anymoreWe’re pursuing?
We were. Do not know if we still are.We’re pursuing?
I know, I was just talking about commits from the visitors
Commit from Dunn or Dixon on this visit? I'd take Dunn if I could only take one. This is where I actually agree with SMF about these guys being on one year contracts.
Dunn is a grad transfer, decent player with experience. You know he'll contribute and you can essentially pencil him in for certain amount of minutes and production.
Dixon is a wildcard. He commits, he may or may not even make it to campus. Does he stay after year one? What's his production as a freshman? Believe me I'd take him without the caveat of one or the other.
Want both but would rather have Dixon over Dunn, if made to choose.
Interesting how they apparently weren't interested in DEI criteria for such a role...So TN has resorted to "comfort" assistants!
I'm confused. Dunn already committed and is a GR, no? Isn't Dixon a '25 recruit so Dunn won't even be here? I want both.I think we are getting Dixon over Virginia, Villanova, Syracuse, etc.. unless something major changes.
I would much rather have Dixon over Dunn given the choice. He is an instant impact freshmen and should make his way into the national top 50.
We have had the full court press on Dixon for 2 years now.
I'm confused. Dunn already committed and is a GR, no? Isn't Dixon a '25 recruit so Dunn won't even be here? I want both.
Obviously because Dunn is a 6th year senior and Derek Dixon is in the class of 2025They will never play on the same team. I was responding to the person of who asked or stated who is better or will be better.
Dixon will be better than Dunn.
Think Pitt was in on him throughout his recruitment.
Played in 33 games an average of 24 min/game and was 85/196 on 2 pt FGs. However, given he was only 1 for 7 on 3-balls, IMHO, Capel would not really want Warley when the current true need is for a high % 3-ball shooter.
Think Pitt was in on him throughout his recruitment.