The NFL officials have him on a conference right now seeking his opinion, you tell them Fillaphoney because you are terrible sports talking head and they desperately want your worthless opinion.I think he was being dramatic to prove his point.
I honestly don’t think he’s so off base here.
Limit the number of reviews-
Not what can be reviewed
He’s essentially parroting bill belichek-I actually agree with him here for once.
He’s essentially parroting bill belichek-
And if there’s a coach who doesn’t have a reason to complain- it’s him.
Will games fit into an 8 hour window. LOL, at some point it won't be "entertainment" anymore.
Those things that are that obvious can be seen and made instantly with no need for challenge, all you need is a guy watching on TV. I'd vote for a guy watching on TV just overturning things that are 110% obvious with no other review process, no challenges, no automatic reviews period.Definitely not nuts. It's a bit ridiculous that the new rule only applies to pass interference when we saw a blatantly obvious false start against the Chargers that was missed lead to a touchdown. Why shouldn't teams be able to challenge any egregious call?
He is actually right... why single out certain infractions and not others that affect the game just as much.
Do you want the flow of the game stopped or an outcome changed because a coach can now flag a minor infraction that had no impact on the play itself just because a staff member is up in the booth looking at all the camera angles/replays?I hate the guy... but this makes total sense. Why wouldn’t it, I don’t understand?
Do you want the flow of the game stopped or an outcome changed because a coach can now flag a minor infraction that had no impact on the play itself just because a staff member is up in the booth looking at all the camera angles/replays?
I actually like this .I honestly don’t think he’s so off base here.
Limit the number of reviews-
Not what can be reviewed