I hate guns and could not own one… and I question the needs or purpose for such a law other than grandstanding against lib’s gun railings… but, come on, at WVU and all such big schools with huge tailgates, there are going to be people there who have guns. They might be someone not going to the game and just there for the party (it’s a prime place to deal drugs), or they just leave ‘em in their vehicles.
Pitt’s own stadium and campus (alas not one and the same of course) are each mostly surrounded by semi-ghettos, where the regular denizens come through parking lots and campus streets with (mostly illegal) guns. And those guns frequently get used. A Giant Eagle store only a couple hundred yards from several tailgate lots on the north shore has had problems with frequent shootings in its parking lot, mainly by people from nearby homeless camps (got so bad it finally led the city to grudgingly clear those camps out).
As mentioned, a big party scene like tailgates will inevitably attract bad seeds, dealers, etc who will be armed. The ticket scalpers roaming the crowds, carrying wads of money, aren’t exactly the most scrupulous individuals either. They are going to be packing. Sad to say, guns are already there; a symbolic law allowing it (or likewise, another unenforceable one trying to outlaw it) isn’t changing it.
There are likely plenty of legitimate reasons to refrain from scheduling WVU on the basis of their hazardous fans, but this really doesn’t change or add to them. It was Wild West at their games before, so this changes nothing. This certainly didn’t keep Pitt from scheduling games with them.
Let me say that even the most progressive admin such as Pitt’s isn’t going to risk big paydays by EVER canceling games on such basis, or anything else related to illegal, immoral, unethical behaviors. The green is too bright. When the PSU Sandusky scandal broke, at a time Pitt SHOULD have done something like that (cancel games), Pitt instead did a total 180, kept our existing games, and even jumped on their cynical token offer to schedule 2 more games (the last 2 they’ll ever schedule with us, pending some new scandal).
The Pitt champions who post here need not jump on me with some huge screed of why Pitt couldn’t do that. Pitt, which claims to be so sensitive to plights of the abused, absolutely could have done it, and should have, but failed to. Pitt certainly wasn’t alone there; all universities failed to back their principles in that situation. The point is, big football money and progressive university brass make strange and creepy bed fellows.