Looks good for us.
- Would qualify as your "designated shooter." Hopefully some Lair members aren't in their panic rooms as we have been told these guys cannot play defense and anyone they guard will automatically go for 30. Personally, I believe you HAVE to have a designated shooter in today's college basketball which has really become just a 3 point shooting competition.
Nobody has ever actually said that, but I suppose it's also not a surprise that that's what someone of your intellect got out of it.
Seriously, find me one post from anyone ever on this board where someone said that guys who can shoot can't play any defense at all. The thought that someone could be a good shooter and still manage to play decent or even good defense must boggle your mind.
The injury prone stuff with Murphy is a tad alarming (couldn't think of a better word here). If he can become a Ronald Ramon type, then I'm all for it. Hopefully he continues to keep working on shooting, athleticism, etc.
The dribble-drives by X and Trey, then passing to Murphy, are what is needed here. Hopefully it's true too that other P5 schools were looking at him too. We shall see.
YesYou are selling Ramon well short. I will settle for Sterling Smith, who I actually liked. He just couldn't get any open looks because he couldn't create his own shot and James Rohinson created 0 offense and 0 open looks for him. With Johnson and Trey, Murphy, or a guy like Sterling Smith, will get PLENTY of open looks so it's just a matter of knocking them down.
Just won a lot of gamesAnd Tino was one of the greatest QBs in Pitt history by certain metrics. Robinson was mediocre if I'm being nice. He took no chances and created no offense. Would have been great for a blue blood where he could just dribble the ball up the court and not screw up but we needed him to do something for us and he couldn't
Yes
The all Time assist to turnover pg held back sterling smith.
Lots of assists to every one else- but sterling.
Take a break
Who won a lot of games? Robinson? He was barely above .500 vs P6 teams.
Please, give it a break will ya. Next thing you'll be reminding us how, as usual
you were right all along.
Who won a lot of games? Robinson? He was barely above .500 vs P6 teams.
Tino never came through in the clutch. Robinson did it numerous times during his 4 year career. Just stop already.Why? Tino's and Robinson's stats were at the all-time great category. Both took very few chances, both were around .500 vs P5/P6 teams. Tell me why this is such a bad comparison.
I like this a good bit.
As much as they need a guy who can really challenge/push/backup Brown, they needed a third guard. NDir was OK, he was serviceable because he was a plus athlete and helped the maintain the pressure from the guard spots when he replaced X or Tre.
Murphy probabably is not going to be a strong defensively, but looks to give back more offensively. Crafty as heck, can shoot, and should be plug and play.
Agree that his injury history gives you pause, but this he can be a BIG help to keep the guard play a positive in backing up X and Tre.
You have to have more than one legitimate deep shooter. You need 3 or 4. Even most 4s now play from the wings.Seems like he will commit to us. Interesting recruit.
- Would qualify as your "designated shooter." Hopefully some Lair members aren't in their panic rooms as we have been told these guys cannot play defense and anyone they guard will automatically go for 30. Personally, I believe you HAVE to have a designated shooter in today's college basketball which has really become just a 3 point shooting competition.
- Shot 40% from 3 as a RS FR at Charlotte. 32-80 but in only 19 games because he broke his foot. Only shot 33 2 pointers which is kinda what you'd expect.
- Besides the injury issues, the fact that he only shot 28% from 3 last year is a red flag but he did only play 13 games and had a woeful stretch of 5 games where he went 8-42 and just didn't have the amount of games to offset that.
- Does seem injury prone as he has had season-ending injuries 2 years in a row and maybe 3 because I don't know why he redshirted his first year at Charlotte
- Went to Calabassas HS outside LA. Calabasas is one of the most, if not the most wealthy communities in the country. Although I'm sure most of those kids go to private school, I am sure he has some interesting stories about celebrities and celebrity kids.
- Overall, this is a low risk recruit. He has 2 years left. He'll either be a nice asset off the bench or he'll never play and you recycle the scholarship after 2 years.
You're the one who interjected the "all-time great" nonsense into the discussion. I don't think anyone would say Robinson was an all-time great based on stats or any other measure.Why? Tino's and Robinson's stats were at the all-time great category. Both took very few chances, both were around .500 vs P5/P6 teams. Tell me why this is such a bad comparison.
I am sure he has some interesting stories about celebrities and celebrity kids.
That was a totally random and really weird thing to post about this player. Also, Calabasas is a money town, but it isn't even one of the top 10 wealthiest cities in southern California, let alone the country.
Tino never came through in the clutch. Robinson did it numerous times during his 4 year career. Just stop already.
Ryan Murphy seems to be a good but not great shooter. We don't really know about his defense. I realize this is totally hypothetical but would you rather have an elite shooter like Micah Mason, the 4th best 3 college point shooter in the history of the world, or a good but not great shooter like Murphy, who does not appear to be overly athletic.
He got most of his assists due to playing with some guys ended up playing in the NBA as was stated.
I'd have to see Murphy play in some real games to decide one way or the other about him specifically. But one thing that we do know for certain is that college coaches at schools a lot higher in the pecking order than Duquesne wanted Murphy to play for them, and when Mason was coming off one of the greatest three point shooting seasons in NCAA history none of the blue bloods and none of the next level or two down programs had any interest in him at all.
There's a reason he ended up at Duquense and not Duke, or even Pitt or Penn State.
Well, we don't know for a fact if Mason was eligible to grad transfer though I'd assume he was. We also don't know if he would have wanted to as he was already playing in a pretty good league (A10 had Xavier, Temple, and Butler back then). Grad transfers weren't a real big thing back then. Maybe you had a handful of impact ones per year. Now everybody does it. Its trendy. If Mason was coming off his junior year right now and wanted to grad transfer, I am certain he could have named his destination, except for the blue bloods and a handful of other schools. If his name was in the transfer portal shooting 50% from 3 in the A10, you know that everyone would be beating down his door.
The only real "NBA guy" on the roster during James' tenure only played one year at Pitt. Calling the likes of Patterson, Artis or Young "NBA guys" is disingenuous.And those NBA guys went from a 9-9 record to a 4-14 record when Robinson graduated. His departure was not the only variable, as the head coaching talent took a considerable nosedive from Dixon to Stallings. But still, it was clearly a much better team with Robinson.