No opposing teams worry about himhis man off the dribble...lack of creation create major problems when shots won't go down
He was bad. He is better than that. I am not sure he can't, didn't see him try as much last night. Even young Damon Wilson tried. Wilson is going to be a different PG, maybe will have a worse assist/TO ratio, but looks like he is a guy who will be able to create and score better.
In a game where a Team is struggling for even 1 point like last night's, your 4 year starter @ PG has got to look to score and if he doesn't you get that debacle of an offensive performance last night. Furthermore, if he's incapable or unwilling to do so put someone in there who will. Found myself screaming at the tv after another break of the 'Ville pressure "Push it! Go to the Rack!" Hard to watch.This was a game where James should have tried to force it into the lane. He can do that to some degree.
I suspect with all of the turnovers, he didn't want to force. But we had to try to find some ways to score.
That wasn't going to happen against this opponent. James doesn't have a strong off hand and they took away his right. Their guards had no problem fencing him in and staying in front of him. They harassed him all game and he had no counter punch. he certainly isn't going to cross anyone over or break down an athletic defender off the bounce.This was a game where James should have tried to force it into the lane. He can do that to some degree.
I suspect with all of the turnovers, he didn't want to force. But we had to try to find some ways to score.
The Louisville game wasn't just that he couldn't create his own shot, as you said he has never been that player. What really killed us was he couldn't even create enough space to allow himself to get us into our offensive sets. It didn't help that we don't have a strong secondary ballhandler at the 2. They clamped down on JROB and choked off our offense at the neck. It wasn't pretty but it was just one game- hopefully.Did anyone expect James to become a different player?
He's not going to put on a kemba walker outfit.
He's the same player he's always been, which is a very good floor general.. Not someone who creates his own shot.
It's hysterical to me the same people who declared he was a different and better player 1 weeks ago, incorrectly, are now flummoxed their perception is wrong.
Nobody could create any space that game.The Louisville game wasn't just that he couldn't create his own shot, as you said he has never been that player. What really killed us was he couldn't even create enough space to allow himself to get us into our offensive sets. It didn't help that we don't have a strong secondary ballhandler at the 2. They clamped down on JROB and choked off our offense at the neck. It wasn't pretty but it was just one game- hopefully.
10 pointsWhy criticize Seth for telling the truth? He has no skin in the game here.
One would think that a PG on this level should be quick and can createHe was bad. He is better than that. I am not sure he can't, didn't see him try as much last night. Even young Damon Wilson tried. Wilson is going to be a different PG, maybe will have a worse assist/TO ratio, but looks like he is a guy who will be able to create and score better.
His bio says he can't create or beat his man. That's not part of his game. He probably got that from reading his bio on ESPN.
he ishis man off the dribble...lack of creation create major problems when shots won't go down
his man off the dribble...lack of creation create major problems when shots won't go down
Both points made by the OP are IMO correct. He's not strong in creating, nor can he beat his man off the dribble. The reason it's a big problem for Pitt is we also never seem to have an off guard who can do those things either. If we did, Robinson's limitations would hardly be noticed. Since we don't now, and
never seem to have that off guard, we have to sometimes rely on Robinson, and then we see his
weaknesses. IMO Jamie's priority is to have a pg to run/manage the offense. I wonder
what Jamie would do with a Barber type if he had one. (We're gonna see Barber first hand tonight lol).
With all that said, let's not forget Robinson's many attributes; solid non scoring, non creating type of pg,
very good team leader, assists to turnover ration which is off the charts, good on the fast break, and
a coach on the floor type that IMO Jamie wants first and foremost. Can that type of pg get us to the final
four?...not with this supporting cast. BUtT..NCAA's and twenty plus wins?...yes.