Perhaps. And I should also be married to Kate Upton. Neither are pertinent to the fact at hand.The two gunners completely whiffing was the major issue with that play...not the block.
Perhaps. And I should also be married to Kate Upton. Neither are pertinent to the fact at hand.The two gunners completely whiffing was the major issue with that play...not the block.
The two gunners completely whiffing was the major issue with that play...not the block.
I don't like the rule, but it's the rule. And it was dutifully called by the refs on the field, who so many here say are sacred. There was absolutely not clarity in the videos. If the much more dubious targeting call against Jones on a routine sack some weeks back survived scrutiny, this should have as well.
And the hold on the Homer run indeed was blatant.
Miami still deserved the win. An offense as bad as ours likely wouldn't have scored a TD against them if they were still playing right now.
And Miami may well have gone on to score tds on those 2 very possessions. They were the better team. Only self imposed drops prevented a bigger deficit. It was bound to happen some time.
But factually, granting Miami those 2 particular TDs was not deserved.
Or, just really good blocking downfield by a receiver, something our team is noted for. At least I can see an argument here, but watching it live shows he is clearly driving the defender downfield.
Perhaps. And I should also be married to Kate Upton. Neither are pertinent to the fact at hand.
They whiffed due to stopping when the returner stopped looking like it was a fair catch.
Anyways it’s senseless to argue, it wasn’t called, so it doesn’t matter and the game wouldn’t have changed.
I have no idea as to what you’re driving to - they make the tackle there is no block. And they save their teammate from getting totally destroyed by a block that’s been in football for a century.
But those things didn't happen, so the illegal play did occur.I have no idea as to what you’re driving to - they make the tackle there is no block. And they save their teammate from getting totally destroyed by a block that’s been in football for a century.
No...they whiffed because they took bad angles - that wasn’t even close to being a fair catch signal. We’re just reaching now.
That's a different and frankly irrelevant argument here. Good or bad the rule is the rule. They called it on the field. There was no irrefutable evidence to justify overturning. Indeed, head to head contact was seen, if anything it corroborated the call. That's the true issue.Exactly it doesn’t matter if it is dirty play and can cause major long term harm to a young guy. The important thing is keeping things as they are. I’ve been telling my slaves that for years
That's a different and frankly irrelevant argument here. Good or bad the rule is the rule. They called it on the field. There was no irrefutable evidence to justify overturning. Indeed, head to head contact was seen, if anything it corroborated the call. That's the true issue.
Ah. My meter is off today.No I agree. I’m saying the same thing just st being sarcastic
Haha
Well thanks for coming on the board to troll
But those things didn't happen, so the illegal play did occur.
Dallas raised his hand to about eye level as he drop stepped with his left foot to retreat for the ball. He then move his hand backwards as he moved to catch the ball. A fair catch signal requires he raise his hand clearly above his head and wave his hand more than once. It was not a fair catch signal.
From the NCAA Rule Book:
ARTICLE 2. A valid signal is a signal given by a player of Team B who has obviously signaled his intention by extending one hand only clearly above his head and waving that hand from side to side of his body more than once.
It was clearly not a fair catch signal, other than the diehards I don’t think anyone really disputes that.
It was irrefutableIf the rule is on the books, dumb as it is (and it is), and it's called on the field (as it was), it should have been absolutely irrefutable to overturn it.
Even the middle school girls league softball umpires here, who continually bleat that refs are infallible gods, were admitting that the replays had ambiguity. Head contact was made, refs called it, it shouldn't have been overturned, and it was a huge turning point in a low scoring game.
All the Penn State trolls taking a break from anally assaulting the 7 year olds shackled up in their basement to start new accounts here, plus the usual argue- everything- regardless- how retarded types that infest the internet, posting gibberish to the contrary won't change these facts.
Reversing that call went against every bit of precedent established in recent years and shouldn't have been done, whatever the motive the guys in Charlotte had to order it so (but clearly they did, given it took an eternity).
THAT is the truth. Lock the thread.
No driving to the helmet.Yes exactly... as I said, he drove through the helmet
Also the TD run had a huge hold that wasn’t called that led to the td
As I posted, I have found most of the Pitt fans here to be really fine posters, knowledgeable, and clearly able to put their points down in writing. .
No driving to the helmet.
Holy crap are you blinded
You just happened to stumble upon two of the dumbest morons who support Pitt. Itt happens.
and for the record helmet to helmet contact doesn't even come into play, blindside blocks are illegal. Not surprising that the ACC refs have no clue what the rules are
Shhh don’t bring facts into it. Some posters think the refs are absolutely infallible and any question about a bad call on a pitt forum is paramount to calling their mothers whores.
Some video jockey bubba at the conference office put down his Bojangles bucket momentarily and overruled the refs call on the field.If it was an illegal play - how did it count for a touchdown?
Not blind sideThe NFL made that block illegal, the Hines Ward rule. I am pretty sure it is illegal in college as well but these refs are just ridiculous so who knows.
But blindside blocks like this one are illegal in the NFL for sure.
The officiating professionals who watch the replays and make the calls professionally reviewed every angle in slow motion six ways to Sunday and found it to be a clean play.Just watch the highlight
It’s crazy to argue
Not blind side
Not even closeIt was definitely a blind side hit. The exact same thing Hines Ward used to do and why it was made illegal.
Lmao.. lookup what blindside means.. Or do our players all have their eye in the back of their heads. The Miami guy hit him in the Chest, that is the complete opposite of a blindside hit. God our fans are stupid
Not even close
He stepped in front of him in the direct path the Pitt player was running .
It wasn’t a change of direction circumstance- which is what a blindside hit would be.
No penalty.
And conclusive evidence to overturn the call on the field .move on
Perhaps reread my post when I flat out explained the difference.Do you know what a blind side hit is? Do you know why the NFL banned the Hines Ward blocks? They aren't clips, so why are they illegal?
Because you have to extend your hand over your head and wave it back and forth more than once. I posted the rule book definition earlier in this thread.
That’s what he is doing