Seton Hall in a better league than Rhode Island or UConn?I could see Xaiver, not sure Seton Hall makes sense even being in NJ when UConn and Pitt are on the table.
Where are you seeing this? Louisville seems likely to hire Mack so I think Xavier will be open job as well.
Seton Hall might be involved in violations.Seton Hall alum, coached HS in NJ, not staring down potential lengthy violations like Louisville and UConn. I can see the interest for Hurley there.
Seton Hall in a better league than Rhode Island or UConn?
Brian Rauf @brauf33Yeah but it is hardly a big time job. I don't know maybe he would as he is an Alum.
But it is not open job either. Williard is not getting fired and I don't see him being hired anywhere else. Hopefully not at Pitt.
Where are you seeing them as speculation?
Only Xavier would be a realistic option if Mack goes to Louisville at this point.
Weren't they fairly minor though? Obviously Louisville has been the poster child in this, UConn might not actually end up being that bad either they just wanted Ollie out.Seton Hall might be involved in violations.
I don't have exact information but believe they are related to his recruitment of Whitehead.Weren't they fairly minor though? Obviously Louisville has been the poster child in this, UConn might not actually end up being that bad either they just wanted Ollie out.
Would Duquesne coach take the job? Best of what's left or as good and cheaper most likely
You might be happier following Duquesne
They will end up with the better coach , take that bet ?
Maybe Wanny will come back for you too?
Who besides Sean Miller would you find acceptable?
or Xaiver or Seton Hall should they open up.
Pitt needs to end this one way or the other today.
No - I linked a national reporters tweet and a post from the Rhode Island board, both clearly identified, not some nebulous sources behind the curtain.Isn't your posting this the exact same thing you spoke against in your thread below when you asked for posters to quit wasting people's time? Just sayin'
That was more subliminal messagesIsn't your posting this the exact same thing you spoke against in your thread below when you asked for posters to quit wasting people's time? Just sayin'
No - I linked a national reporters tweet and a post from the Rhode Island board, both clearly identified, not some nebulous sources behind the curtain.
I clearly was not claiming to know anything. I believe I used the word "may".
I think there is a difference between claiming to be an insider and linking something someone else has posted on line.
Some of those claiming to be insiders seem to be getting a lot of grief recently from those heeding or paying for insider information.
The folks claiming to know things are almost certainly being told things by people who are more connected to the situation than most posters. It's up to each reader to decide what credence they will give to each post. I do not understand your bitterness on the subject.
The reason most are on the message board is to engage in the fun of conjecturing just like you did by starting this thread.
Bitterness?
"I wish the so called insiders would follow this advice:
If you KNOW something say something.
If you Don't KNOW Anything don't say anything.
KNOW someone was contacted report it.
KNOW someone interviewed report it.
KNOW someone reported to be a candidate is not a candidate report it.
Otherwise spare us your musings."
Does that sound bitter to you?
Did that offend you?
It was not an insult directed to you. It was advice directed to anyone claiming to be an insider. Claiming that they know what is behind the curtain.
From my experiences on the board, there is only one poster who I believe possesses that kind of knowledge.