ADVERTISEMENT

Sounds like Hurley may be interested in Louisville

gary2

Athletic Director
Jul 21, 2001
18,833
7,686
113
or Xaiver or Seton Hall should they open up.

Pitt needs to end this one way or the other today.
 
I could see Xaiver, not sure Seton Hall makes sense even being in NJ when UConn and Pitt are on the table.

Where are you seeing this? Louisville seems likely to hire Mack so I think Xavier will be open job as well.
 
Seton Hall alum, coached HS in NJ, not staring down potential lengthy violations like Louisville and UConn. I can see the interest for Hurley there.
 
I could see Xaiver, not sure Seton Hall makes sense even being in NJ when UConn and Pitt are on the table.

Where are you seeing this? Louisville seems likely to hire Mack so I think Xavier will be open job as well.
Seton Hall in a better league than Rhode Island or UConn?
 
Seton Hall in a better league than Rhode Island or UConn?

Yeah but it is hardly a big time job. I don't know maybe he would as he is an Alum.

But it is not open job either. Williard is not getting fired and I don't see him being hired anywhere else. Hopefully not at Pitt.

Where are you seeing them as speculation?

Only Xavier would be a realistic option if Mack goes to Louisville at this point.
 
I think SH has the same upside as RI, aside from his personal connections. If Im Hurley and I want to get into the NY market I just wait for Syracuse to open up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMcG17
Yeah but it is hardly a big time job. I don't know maybe he would as he is an Alum.

But it is not open job either. Williard is not getting fired and I don't see him being hired anywhere else. Hopefully not at Pitt.

Where are you seeing them as speculation?

Only Xavier would be a realistic option if Mack goes to Louisville at this point.
Brian Rauf @brauf33

Confirming what we already knew. Don’t be surprised if Louisville makes a last-ditch attempt at Hurley https://twitter.com/evandaniels/status/976528047364067329 …

2:43 PM - Mar 21, 2018

RhodyRam86 wrote:we are all getting worked up over this decision like once it is made, there will be peace and calm throughout Kingston until next year at this time. who doesn't think we will go through this all again if Willard leaves SH for Pitt or Mack leaves X for Louisville? Do you think Dan won't explore those opportunities any more than he is CT and Pitt now? IMHO...any commitment Dan makes to URI will not be worth the paper it's written on. I don't think this is over today, tomorrow or next week...

hope I'm wrong...

http://keaneyblue.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=6642&start=3650
 
Last edited:
Seton Hall might be involved in violations.
Weren't they fairly minor though? Obviously Louisville has been the poster child in this, UConn might not actually end up being that bad either they just wanted Ollie out.
 
It seems like everyone is consumed with the places other coaches are interested in.

We as PITT fans should be interested in what coach is interested in PITT and it better happen soon!

"it's five o'clock somewhere"
Signed: Mr Buffett
Go PITT & CSU Rams!
 
Isn't your posting this the exact same thing you spoke against in your thread below when you asked for posters to quit wasting people's time? Just sayin'
No - I linked a national reporters tweet and a post from the Rhode Island board, both clearly identified, not some nebulous sources behind the curtain.

I clearly was not claiming to know anything. I believe I used the word "may".

I think there is a difference between claiming to be an insider and linking something someone else has posted on line.

Some of those claiming to be insiders seem to be getting a lot of grief recently from those heeding or paying for insider information.
 
No - I linked a national reporters tweet and a post from the Rhode Island board, both clearly identified, not some nebulous sources behind the curtain.

I clearly was not claiming to know anything. I believe I used the word "may".

I think there is a difference between claiming to be an insider and linking something someone else has posted on line.

Some of those claiming to be insiders seem to be getting a lot of grief recently from those heeding or paying for insider information.

The folks claiming to know things are almost certainly being told things by people who are more connected to the situation than most posters. It's up to each reader to decide what credence they will give to each post. I do not understand your bitterness on the subject.

The reason most are on the message board is to engage in the fun of conjecturing just like you did by starting this thread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tbro34
The folks claiming to know things are almost certainly being told things by people who are more connected to the situation than most posters. It's up to each reader to decide what credence they will give to each post. I do not understand your bitterness on the subject.

The reason most are on the message board is to engage in the fun of conjecturing just like you did by starting this thread.

Bitterness?
 
Bitterness?

"I wish the so called insiders would follow this advice:

If you KNOW something say something.

If you Don't KNOW Anything don't say anything.

KNOW someone was contacted report it.
KNOW someone interviewed report it.
KNOW someone reported to be a candidate is not a candidate report it.

Otherwise spare us your musings."
 
"I wish the so called insiders would follow this advice:

If you KNOW something say something.

If you Don't KNOW Anything don't say anything.

KNOW someone was contacted report it.
KNOW someone interviewed report it.
KNOW someone reported to be a candidate is not a candidate report it.

Otherwise spare us your musings."

Does that sound bitter to you?

Did that offend you?

It was not an insult directed to you. It was advice directed to anyone claiming to be an insider. Claiming that they know what is behind the curtain.

From my experiences on the board, there is only one poster who I believe possesses that kind of knowledge.
 
Does that sound bitter to you?

Did that offend you?

It was not an insult directed to you. It was advice directed to anyone claiming to be an insider. Claiming that they know what is behind the curtain.

From my experiences on the board, there is only one poster who I believe possesses that kind of knowledge.

It does.

It did not offend me personally, nor am I offended by anyone claiming to be an insider.
 
  • Like
Reactions: levance2
I am friends with someone who worked with Hurley for a number of years, he suggested same as the OP - that UConn is top choice and Xavier/Louisville are on his list before Pitt. I don't pertain to be an insider, just someone bending an ear of an old friend with ties to DH.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT