The fundamental flaw with his argument, and the argument that many opponents of stricter/mandatory measures is this statement: "people want to know what their risk is and then make their own decisions about protecting themselves." (I might not have that correct word for word) The problem is that those decisions that people make also, and primarily, protect other people. If you do not wear a mask, for instance, you are putting others at risk, not so much yourself. So this "freedom" is really the freedom to harm others.