It doesn't sound like it by the excerpt from the article I read:
Wildhack joked that Dino Babers, like most college football coaches, would love to have 12 home games on the schedule but said he recognized the opportunity to play at Yankee Stadium and supported moving the game.
“The fact that we’ll still have six home games is paramount,” Wildhack said. “If that wasn’t the case, I wouldn’t do it. We’re not dropping below six home games.”
As for the financial impact of moving the game for both the university and fans, Wildhack said he’s confident the arrangement the university has made with the Yankees will cover any additional costs SU incurs by needing to travel.
The university is also working to arrange discounted tickets for season ticket holders who will have one less home game to look forward to. Season tickets are not yet on sale, but fans can make a $25 deposit to hold their spot for the upcoming season.
While details of the game are still being finalized, Wildhack said he assumes there will be celebrations before the game and during to commemorate the centennial anniversary. It is also expected to be nationally televised.
Obviously the Yankees will be getting theirs. I don't really see where the opportunity exists to generate much more revenue than they would have with a home game in which they're entitled to full ticket, concession, and stadium parking revenue, etc. Especially when adding discounted season tickets on top of that. Even if it is an extra million bucks, that'd be peanuts and not worth a solely revenue-incentivized venue change. Has to have something to do with the TV angle, I would imagine.