ADVERTISEMENT

Vader: Year 1 Complete Recruiting Review

Vader_Storm

Sophomore
Dec 16, 2018
2,494
4,680
113
Year 1 Recruiting Review

Stallings Era- 5 Acc wins in 2 years

Capel Era- 4 Acc wins in year 1

247 ACC Cumulative Team Recruiting Rank for 2018- 5th acc, 32nd nationally

Did Pitt live up to its 2018 Top 5 ACC recruiting ranking?

Xavier Johnson was voted the 4th best freshmen in the entire ACC and finished 11th in the ACC in scoring. He will be the 2nd highest returning ACC scorer entering next year in the entire league. Johnson was 5th in the ACC in assist per game and will be the 2nd highest returning player in assists per game. Mcgowens finished 40th in the ACC in ppg and will enter next season in the Top 15 ( Top 20 at worst) in returning ppg for all Acc players. Pitt’s 3 freshmen averaged 33.5 ppg, 12.6 rpg, 7 apg, and 4 steals per game. This is the best trio of freshmen returning in the entire ACC from a productivity standpoint or accolade standpoint for all acc trio of freshmen. Only Duke and UNC had better freshmen last year and almost all of them are NBA bound.

Year 1 2018 Recruiting Grade given the circumstances- A

Year 2

What Pitt has so far…

I talked about Gerald Drumgoole in a former post and how he is a future 2 guard or wing at Pitt as a shooter and facilitator. What continues to improve is his floor game. A 7-1 assist to turnover ratio at Geico Nationals as a wing against a bevy of 4 and 5 star players in the National high school Tournament Championship. Drumgoole is one of the best defensive players in the 2019 recruiting class and one of the most efficient players. He doesn’t turn the ball over in the half court or against press and was a big reason why La Lumiere finished the regular season undefeated and ranked #1 in high school in the regular season. He is a very smart basketball player. There is a reason Kham Davis and Malik Ellison are gone and Ill spell it out. They would barely play next year.


Karim Coulibaly was the first player I mentioned going all the way back to my very first post on this board last year when I called him underrated “then”. A current 4 star player by ESPN at 6’9 235lb as a Forward / Center, he led Scotland Red Prep to a 37-2 final record, a National #1 Ranking, and lost in the Prep School National Title game. Coulibaly was voted unanimously as the Greater Atlantic Conference Prep Player of the Year. When he stays out of foul trouble, he put up the numbers all year long, with a shooting percentage almost 55% for the season. One should wonder how a team like Scotland Red was this dominant and bulldoze over almost every nationally ranked opponent they played regardless of the amount of ranked 4 and 5 star players the other team had, yet have zero Top 150 players ranked on their own team.

Coulibaly was a former Top 60 recruit and a player Capel started recruiting very early last summer. He played like a Top 60 player Nationally all year long which is why he finished at Scotland Red with over 1000 career points in 2 seasons, averaged over a career double double with a 57-4 team record as the Team Captain and leader. He posted season highs of 41 points and 18 rebounds in a single game. And if Scotland Red Prep didn’t blow out almost every team they played, Coulibaly’s rebound and scoring numbers would have finished even better than 16ppg. He also had the best defensive rebound percentage in AAU last year at Adidas. Ill also provide his numbers against Kofi Cockburn, Tre Mitchell, and Qudus Wahab last summer in AAU. That 5 Star ranked below him just committed to Duke.




DvjH-RFX0AEc97O.jpg


DpeqCt_V4AErycP.jpg



2019-bigs-png.36529




Justin Champagnie was voted a 5th team high school All American last summer when he averaged 20 points per game in AAU shooting 65% from the floor playing center and power forward and he continued that strong production his senior year and was voted 1st team all CHSAA averaging 20ppg. He is a very good finisher in the paint with dunks, layups, floaters and anything inside 10 feet. This is a player that has the ability to hurt teams being in the middle against a 2-3 zone which severely hurt us this year and why he is an important recruit as an inside zone breaker. A big 6’6+ in height and very physical, he has far advanced dribble skills and passing skills to someone like Ellison or Toney and plays significantly bigger than he is, especially rebounding the basketball.

Justin won’t turn 18 until this summer and is very young for a 2019 recruit. He doesn’t shoot much from the outside but he has the ability to knock down shots with a defender in his face. Like the 3 recruits from 2018, you will notice immediately he plays the game with an edge and NY style physical toughness like Pitt used to play in the early 2000s.

This class is very solid as it stands and will help Pitt a lot next season and in the future. I like each of these players and talked about each of them extensively in the past. More importantly, the skill sets of these players should compliment the 3 freshmen from this past season very well. I am excited for the additions of these 3 and if you are not exited by these additions right now, you will be once they start playing real games just like Xavier Johnson and the freshmen showed last year. With these 6 players and I say this with utmost confidence, Pitt will start to vault up the ACC standings starting next year.
 
Year 1 Recruiting Review

Stallings Era- 5 Acc wins in 2 years

Capel Era- 4 Acc wins in year 1

247 ACC Cumulative Team Recruiting Rank for 2018- 5th acc, 32nd nationally

Did Pitt live up to its 2018 Top 5 ACC recruiting ranking?

Xavier Johnson was voted the 4th best freshmen in the entire ACC and finished 11th in the ACC in scoring. He will be the 2nd highest returning ACC scorer entering next year in the entire league. Johnson was 5th in the ACC in assist per game and will be the 2nd highest returning player in assists per game. Mcgowens finished 40th in the ACC in ppg and will enter next season in the Top 15 ( Top 20 at worst) in returning ppg for all Acc players. Pitt’s 3 freshmen averaged 33.5 ppg, 12.6 rpg, 7 apg, and 4 steals per game. This is the best trio of freshmen returning in the entire ACC from a productivity standpoint or accolade standpoint for all acc trio of freshmen. Only Duke and UNC had better freshmen last year and almost all of them are NBA bound.

Year 1 2018 Recruiting Grade given the circumstances- A

Year 2

What Pitt has so far…

I talked about Gerald Drumgoole in a former post and how he is a future 2 guard or wing at Pitt as a shooter and facilitator. What continues to improve is his floor game. A 7-1 assist to turnover ratio at Geico Nationals as a wing against a bevy of 4 and 5 star players in the National high school Tournament Championship. Drumgoole is one of the best defensive players in the 2019 recruiting class and one of the most efficient players. He doesn’t turn the ball over in the half court or against press and was a big reason why La Lumiere finished the regular season undefeated and ranked #1 in high school in the regular season. He is a very smart basketball player. There is a reason Kham Davis and Malik Ellison are gone and Ill spell it out. They would barely play next year.


Karim Coulibaly was the first player I mentioned going all the way back to my very first post on this board last year when I called him underrated “then”. A current 4 star player by ESPN at 6’9 235lb as a Forward / Center, he led Scotland Red Prep to a 37-2 final record, a National #1 Ranking, and lost in the Prep School National Title game. Coulibaly was voted unanimously as the Greater Atlantic Conference Prep Player of the Year. When he stays out of foul trouble, he put up the numbers all year long, with a shooting percentage almost 55% for the season. One should wonder how a team like Scotland Red was this dominant and bulldoze over almost every nationally ranked opponent they played regardless of the amount of ranked 4 and 5 star players the other team had, yet have zero Top 150 players ranked on their own team.

Coulibaly was a former Top 60 recruit and a player Capel started recruiting very early last summer. He played like a Top 60 player Nationally all year long which is why he finished at Scotland Red with over 1000 career points in 2 seasons, averaged over a career double double with a 57-4 team record as the Team Captain and leader. He posted season highs of 41 points and 18 rebounds in a single game. And if Scotland Red Prep didn’t blow out almost every team they played, Coulibaly’s rebound and scoring numbers would have finished even better than 16ppg. He also had the best defensive rebound percentage in AAU last year at Adidas. Ill also provide his numbers against Kofi Cockburn, Tre Mitchell, and Qudus Wahab last summer in AAU. That 5 Star ranked below him just committed to Duke.




DvjH-RFX0AEc97O.jpg


DpeqCt_V4AErycP.jpg



2019-bigs-png.36529




Justin Champagnie was voted a 5th team high school All American last summer when he averaged 20 points per game in AAU shooting 65% from the floor playing center and power forward and he continued that strong production his senior year and was voted 1st team all CHSAA averaging 20ppg. He is a very good finisher in the paint with dunks, layups, floaters and anything inside 10 feet. This is a player that has the ability to hurt teams being in the middle against a 2-3 zone which severely hurt us this year and why he is an important recruit as an inside zone breaker. A big 6’6+ in height and very physical, he has far advanced dribble skills and passing skills to someone like Ellison or Toney and plays significantly bigger than he is, especially rebounding the basketball.

Justin won’t turn 18 until this summer and is very young for a 2019 recruit. He doesn’t shoot much from the outside but he has the ability to knock down shots with a defender in his face. Like the 3 recruits from 2018, you will notice immediately he plays the game with an edge and NY style physical toughness like Pitt used to play in the early 2000s.

This class is very solid as it stands and will help Pitt a lot next season and in the future. I like each of these players and talked about each of them extensively in the past. More importantly, the skill sets of these players should compliment the 3 freshmen from this past season very well. I am excited for the additions of these 3 and if you are not exited by these additions right now, you will be once they start playing real games just like Xavier Johnson and the freshmen showed last year. With these 6 players and I say this with utmost confidence, Pitt will start to vault up the ACC standings starting next year.
Good Report....the future is definitely brighter this year than last!
 
Good Report....the future is definitely brighter this year than last!

Yes, a good report. However, good as these three recruits are, they are not
"difference makers" IMO. Yes, they will add to what we have coming back,
but as I said in an earlier post, they will only help get us to "4 or 5 ACC
wins" this coming year.
We need a Big that can start over Brown and Kene (Sy hopefully). That
will give us depth in the frontcourt and let our guards and wings play their
game out front without having to be responsible for rebounding. I really
would like to see Toney play as a wing and not as a power forward type.
Of course he needs to develop a baseline and corner oustside jump
shot. If he does that with the addition of a true Big, along with Brown,
Kene, and Coulabaly as subs....we will then have the ability to move
into the 7or 8 wins in the ACC. Just my opinion on where we are at
this point in time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rockypanther
Yes, a good report. However, good as these three recruits are, they are not
"difference makers" IMO. Yes, they will add to what we have coming back,
but as I said in an earlier post, they will only help get us to "4 or 5 ACC
wins" this coming year.
We need a Big that can start over Brown and Kene (Sy hopefully). That
will give us depth in the frontcourt and let our guards and wings play their
game out front without having to be responsible for rebounding. I really
would like to see Toney play as a wing and not as a power forward type.
Of course he needs to develop a baseline and corner oustside jump
shot. If he does that with the addition of a true Big, along with Brown,
Kene, and Coulabaly as subs....we will then have the ability to move
into the 7or 8 wins in the ACC. Just my opinion on where we are at
this point in time.
I agree about the big being needed. I really think that just as important is a big time rebounder. The three best rebounders that Pitt had that I remember are Sam Clancy, Jerome Lane and Dejuan Blair...none of these guys were over 6'7''. They all got good position, were strong enough to be not pushed out, had good hands and a lot of "want to". I thought the lack of rebounding really hurt Pitt last year. I guess the ideal would be a big guy who was a dominant rebounder but those people are hard to find.
 
Yes, a good report. However, good as these three recruits are, they are not
"difference makers" IMO. Yes, they will add to what we have coming back,
but as I said in an earlier post, they will only help get us to "4 or 5 ACC
wins" this coming year.
We need a Big that can start over Brown and Kene (Sy hopefully). That
will give us depth in the frontcourt and let our guards and wings play their
game out front without having to be responsible for rebounding. I really
would like to see Toney play as a wing and not as a power forward type.
Of course he needs to develop a baseline and corner oustside jump
shot. If he does that with the addition of a true Big, along with Brown,
Kene, and Coulabaly as subs....we will then have the ability to move
into the 7or 8 wins in the ACC. Just my opinion on where we are at
this point in time.
I think you’re underselling Coulibaly a bit. He’s shown indications on the Adidas circuit, as OP said, of being an elite level rebounder - small sample size aside. He seems to be long enough and his frame looks well-built enough to be a contributor immediately at the 4 (probably his more natural spot) or a smaller 5. Adding his minutes to the Brown/Kene mix presents an immediate upgrade, IMO. He’s probably the recruit I’m most excited about, and I think he’s been the most overlooked as we pine for junior college kids or late bloomers who just happen to be two inches taller.
 
I agree about the big being needed. I really think that just as important is a big time rebounder. The three best rebounders that Pitt had that I remember are Sam Clancy, Jerome Lane and Dejuan Blair...none of these guys were over 6'7''. They all got good position, were strong enough to be not pushed out, had good hands and a lot of "want to". I thought the lack of rebounding really hurt Pitt last year. I guess the ideal would be a big guy who was a dominant rebounder but those people are hard to find.

I don't recall how "long" Clancy was but he and Lane were definitely extremely physically strong and Lane also had hops to go with his strength so they both played taller than their height. Blair, although also very strong, had an additional advantage. His "length" (i.e., wing span) was such that he had the reach of a typical 6-10 guy. So, as a result, he actually truly played 6-10 and not his head height.

Speaking of length--not many know, or recall, that old time perennial NBA all star guard Jerry West had unusually long arms compared to his height. Although his head height made him 6-3, his arm length was such that he played as if he were a 6-6 guard.
 
Yes, a good report. However, good as these three recruits are, they are not
"difference makers" IMO. Yes, they will add to what we have coming back,
but as I said in an earlier post, they will only help get us to "4 or 5 ACC
wins" this coming year.
We need a Big that can start over Brown and Kene (Sy hopefully). That
will give us depth in the frontcourt and let our guards and wings play their
game out front without having to be responsible for rebounding. I really
would like to see Toney play as a wing and not as a power forward type.
Of course he needs to develop a baseline and corner oustside jump
shot. If he does that with the addition of a true Big, along with Brown,
Kene, and Coulabaly as subs....we will then have the ability to move
into the 7or 8 wins in the ACC. Just my opinion on where we are at
this point in time.

I would agree that 4-5 (vs 3) regular season ACC wins next season would represent some progress if the ACC regular season was still 18 games. However, given that--

1. We play two additional ACC games next season (20 vs 18)
2. We have (on paper) a more favorable ACC schedule in terms who we play home vs away than we did last season

Then, only winning 4 regular season ACC games would not appear to represent progress and winning 5 (going 5-15 regular season) would look a lot like merely treading water.

Given that, winning only 4 probably would require being topped by 2 wins in the ACC tourney (vs last year's 1 ACCT win) to leave Pitt fans believing the trajectory is still upward.

Somehow or other, IMHO, getting to 6 ACC wins (including a win or two in the ACCT) looks like the floor for demonstrating continued progress next season. Hopefully that expectation can be met or somewhat exceeded.
 
I agree about the big being needed. I really think that just as important is a big time rebounder. The three best rebounders that Pitt had that I remember are Sam Clancy, Jerome Lane and Dejuan Blair...none of these guys were over 6'7''. They all got good position, were strong enough to be not pushed out, had good hands and a lot of "want to". I thought the lack of rebounding really hurt Pitt last year. I guess the ideal would be a big guy who was a dominant rebounder but those people are hard to find.

Actually I agree. Obviously I'm taking about a Big who ideally is a "dominant
rebounder." The "Clancy, Lane, Blair" types are extremely rare, but since you
mentioned them, I'd gladly take any of those three over Sy or the Bigs we
are currently recruiting. Unfortunately we IMO are not recruiting any of the
likes of those three you mentioned. Those three guys were animals IMO.
As DC pointed out, those guys had uncommon strength and length. They
were able to play above their height. Throw in their attitudes and their
demeanor inside and you had an inside presence that other teams
literally feared. Yup, I'd take any of those three and consider us lucky
to have em.
 
I would agree that 4-5 (vs 3) regular season ACC wins next season would represent some progress if the ACC regular season was still 18 games. However, given that--

1. We play two additional ACC games next season (20 vs 18)
2. We have (on paper) a more favorable ACC schedule in terms who we play home vs away than we did last season

Then, only winning 4 regular season ACC games would not appear to represent progress and winning 5 (going 5-15 regular season) would look a lot like merely treading water.

Given that, winning only 4 probably would require being topped by 2 wins in the ACC tourney (vs last year's 1 ACCT win) to leave Pitt fans believing the trajectory is still upward.

Somehow or other, IMHO, getting to 6 ACC wins (including a win or two in the ACCT) looks like the floor for demonstrating continued progress next season. Hopefully that expectation can be met or somewhat exceeded.

Without a viable big, I think we are looking at 5-15 or 6-14. With Sy or someone like him, I think we are somewhere between 7-13 and 9-11. A viable big is worth 2-4 wins.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chescat
Without a viable big, I think we are looking at 5-15 or 6-14. With Sy or someone like him, I think we are somewhere between 7-13 and 9-11. A viable big is worth 2-4 wins.
Serious question: why don’t you consider Coulibaly to be a “viable big”? You always say that rebounding translates; Coulibaly was one of the best, if not the best rebounder on the Adidas circuit. He was one of the most efficient scorers in the same circuit. Why can’t he come in and contribute at a high level to complement the pieces that we have and are expected to add to with Sy?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pitt5593
Actually I agree. Obviously I'm taking about a Big who ideally is a "dominant
rebounder." The "Clancy, Lane, Blair" types are extremely rare, but since you
mentioned them, I'd gladly take any of those three over Sy or the Bigs we
are currently recruiting. Unfortunately we IMO are not recruiting any of the
likes of those three you mentioned. Those three guys were animals IMO.
As DC pointed out, those guys had uncommon strength and length. They
were able to play above their height. Throw in their attitudes and their
demeanor inside and you had an inside presence that other teams
literally feared. Yup, I'd take any of those three and consider us lucky
to have em.
I think Hugley will be a dominant type rebounder as he gains more muscle.
 
Year 1 Recruiting Review

Stallings Era- 5 Acc wins in 2 years

Capel Era- 4 Acc wins in year 1

247 ACC Cumulative Team Recruiting Rank for 2018- 5th acc, 32nd nationally

Did Pitt live up to its 2018 Top 5 ACC recruiting ranking?

Xavier Johnson was voted the 4th best freshmen in the entire ACC and finished 11th in the ACC in scoring. He will be the 2nd highest returning ACC scorer entering next year in the entire league. Johnson was 5th in the ACC in assist per game and will be the 2nd highest returning player in assists per game. Mcgowens finished 40th in the ACC in ppg and will enter next season in the Top 15 ( Top 20 at worst) in returning ppg for all Acc players. Pitt’s 3 freshmen averaged 33.5 ppg, 12.6 rpg, 7 apg, and 4 steals per game. This is the best trio of freshmen returning in the entire ACC from a productivity standpoint or accolade standpoint for all acc trio of freshmen. Only Duke and UNC had better freshmen last year and almost all of them are NBA bound.

Year 1 2018 Recruiting Grade given the circumstances- A

Year 2

What Pitt has so far…

I talked about Gerald Drumgoole in a former post and how he is a future 2 guard or wing at Pitt as a shooter and facilitator. What continues to improve is his floor game. A 7-1 assist to turnover ratio at Geico Nationals as a wing against a bevy of 4 and 5 star players in the National high school Tournament Championship. Drumgoole is one of the best defensive players in the 2019 recruiting class and one of the most efficient players. He doesn’t turn the ball over in the half court or against press and was a big reason why La Lumiere finished the regular season undefeated and ranked #1 in high school in the regular season. He is a very smart basketball player. There is a reason Kham Davis and Malik Ellison are gone and Ill spell it out. They would barely play next year.


Karim Coulibaly was the first player I mentioned going all the way back to my very first post on this board last year when I called him underrated “then”. A current 4 star player by ESPN at 6’9 235lb as a Forward / Center, he led Scotland Red Prep to a 37-2 final record, a National #1 Ranking, and lost in the Prep School National Title game. Coulibaly was voted unanimously as the Greater Atlantic Conference Prep Player of the Year. When he stays out of foul trouble, he put up the numbers all year long, with a shooting percentage almost 55% for the season. One should wonder how a team like Scotland Red was this dominant and bulldoze over almost every nationally ranked opponent they played regardless of the amount of ranked 4 and 5 star players the other team had, yet have zero Top 150 players ranked on their own team.

Coulibaly was a former Top 60 recruit and a player Capel started recruiting very early last summer. He played like a Top 60 player Nationally all year long which is why he finished at Scotland Red with over 1000 career points in 2 seasons, averaged over a career double double with a 57-4 team record as the Team Captain and leader. He posted season highs of 41 points and 18 rebounds in a single game. And if Scotland Red Prep didn’t blow out almost every team they played, Coulibaly’s rebound and scoring numbers would have finished even better than 16ppg. He also had the best defensive rebound percentage in AAU last year at Adidas. Ill also provide his numbers against Kofi Cockburn, Tre Mitchell, and Qudus Wahab last summer in AAU. That 5 Star ranked below him just committed to Duke.




DvjH-RFX0AEc97O.jpg


DpeqCt_V4AErycP.jpg



2019-bigs-png.36529




Justin Champagnie was voted a 5th team high school All American last summer when he averaged 20 points per game in AAU shooting 65% from the floor playing center and power forward and he continued that strong production his senior year and was voted 1st team all CHSAA averaging 20ppg. He is a very good finisher in the paint with dunks, layups, floaters and anything inside 10 feet. This is a player that has the ability to hurt teams being in the middle against a 2-3 zone which severely hurt us this year and why he is an important recruit as an inside zone breaker. A big 6’6+ in height and very physical, he has far advanced dribble skills and passing skills to someone like Ellison or Toney and plays significantly bigger than he is, especially rebounding the basketball.

Justin won’t turn 18 until this summer and is very young for a 2019 recruit. He doesn’t shoot much from the outside but he has the ability to knock down shots with a defender in his face. Like the 3 recruits from 2018, you will notice immediately he plays the game with an edge and NY style physical toughness like Pitt used to play in the early 2000s.

This class is very solid as it stands and will help Pitt a lot next season and in the future. I like each of these players and talked about each of them extensively in the past. More importantly, the skill sets of these players should compliment the 3 freshmen from this past season very well. I am excited for the additions of these 3 and if you are not exited by these additions right now, you will be once they start playing real games just like Xavier Johnson and the freshmen showed last year. With these 6 players and I say this with utmost confidence, Pitt will start to vault up the ACC standings starting next year.
We need Sy or another Big man that can rebound and protect the rim with some consistently. If we add this position and he is as good or better than Brown next year, we move up the standings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chescat
Serious question: why don’t you consider Coulibaly to be a “viable big”? You always say that rebounding translates; Coulibaly was one of the best, if not the best rebounder on the Adidas circuit. He was one of the most efficient scorers in the same circuit. Why can’t he come in and contribute at a high level to complement the pieces that we have and are expected to add to with Sy?
He can play some 5 but he is a below the rim athlete which may be ok for rebounding but he will be overmatched by height and/or athletic quickness by most average AAU centers as a freshman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pitt Hope 247
Serious question: why don’t you consider Coulibaly to be a “viable big”? You always say that rebounding translates; Coulibaly was one of the best, if not the best rebounder on the Adidas circuit. He was one of the most efficient scorers in the same circuit. Why can’t he come in and contribute at a high level to complement the pieces that we have and are expected to add to with Sy?
Based on Vadars posts and graphics he rebounded less than Kofi, Wahab, and Mitchell. We need to keep realistic expectations for Couilbay as a freshman.
 
Serious question: why don’t you consider Coulibaly to be a “viable big”? You always say that rebounding translates; Coulibaly was one of the best, if not the best rebounder on the Adidas circuit. He was one of the most efficient scorers in the same circuit. Why can’t he come in and contribute at a high level to complement the pieces that we have and are expected to add to with Sy?

He might. Rebounding translates but I have been told my message board experts that Brown is better and if that's true, we have no chance. I KNOW Sy is a viable big. Coulibaly might me. Just dont know yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chescat
Last year's team had one natural rebounder in Toney.

The one similarity in the 3 new recruits is they all are very good rebounders for their positions.

Adding another big rebounder would definitely help but either way Pitt should be better on the boards next season.

I agree about the big being needed. I really think that just as important is a big time rebounder. The three best rebounders that Pitt had that I remember are Sam Clancy, Jerome Lane and Dejuan Blair...none of these guys were over 6'7''. They all got good position, were strong enough to be not pushed out, had good hands and a lot of "want to". I thought the lack of rebounding really hurt Pitt last year. I guess the ideal would be a big guy who was a dominant rebounder but those people are hard to find.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BPKY and gary2
Based on Vadars posts and graphics he rebounded less than Kofi, Wahab, and Mitchell. We need to keep realistic expectations for Couilbay as a freshman.
Uh, actually Abdoul Karim is Abdoul Karim Coulibay, which is his full name. . He was highest in Defensive Rebounding Percentage Rate in the 17-Under table.

His overall number stat is lower than those you mention because his games and minutes at the Adiddas Gauntlet are about half of the others listed in the smaller table.

I have no idea whether he will have an impact or not. I don't know much about the level of competition Scotland faced. But he did about as much as anyone could expect there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: below0w
Uh, actually Abdoul Karim is Abdoul Karim Coulibay, which is his full name. . He was highest in Defensive Rebounding Percentage Rate in the 17-Under table.

His overall number stat is lower than those you mention because his games and minutes at the Adiddas Gauntlet are about half of the others listed in the smaller table.

I have no idea whether he will have an impact or not. I don't know much about the level of competition Scotland faced. But he did about as much as anyone could expect there.

Rebounding translates. If he can rebound he will start (if we lose Sy to the $EC)
 
Uh, actually Abdoul Karim is Abdoul Karim Coulibay, which is his full name. . He was highest in Defensive Rebounding Percentage Rate in the 17-Under table.

His overall number stat is lower than those you mention because his games and minutes at the Adiddas Gauntlet are about half of the others listed in the smaller table.

I have no idea whether he will have an impact or not. I don't know much about the level of competition Scotland faced. But he did about as much as anyone could expect there.
Worth noting, too, is that Wahab, Cockburn and Mitchell all played for Nike teams, so they wouldn’t pop up in the same Adidas-only leaderboard that Coulibaly appears on - though the comparisons to Tshiebwe are encouraging. You could certainly argue that Coulibaly had one of the best, if not the best, season in the Adidas last summer.

I don’t subscribe to the same service as OP, so I can’t pull up what Wahab, Mitchell, or Cockburn’s usage and efficiency ratings look like in the Nike circuit to really get a comparable.
 
Uh, actually Abdoul Karim is Abdoul Karim Coulibay, which is his full name. . He was highest in Defensive Rebounding Percentage Rate in the 17-Under table.

His overall number stat is lower than those you mention because his games and minutes at the Adiddas Gauntlet are about half of the others listed in the smaller table.

I have no idea whether he will have an impact or not. I don't know much about the level of competition Scotland faced. But he did about as much as anyone could expect there.
Ok. Must have misread it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DC_Area_Panther
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT