The coaches all saw what we saw in game one. There's a reason they make millions coaching football and we post on message boards.I don’t think anyone is suggesting that CV is comparable to Tua in any way. Nor is anyone suggesting that Jurk is comparable to Hurts in any way. Other than that they are all humans playing QB. .
What is being suggested is that a coach like Saban, i.e., an elite coach, would never have sat back and watched 4 full games of the Jurk show before pulling the cord. If it had been Saban, I don’t think he’d have waited 4 full possessions to make the change. Of course, a coach like Saban never would have been in that position to begin with, but this is a hypothetical debate.
CV may not have been ready for this, he still may not be ready for it, but what was very clear is that Jurk didn’t have it, or anything close to it.
I know it’s a delicate equation to bench your starter especially when you bring him in specifically to be your starter. But it’s hard to imagine that Duzz and the coaches didn’t know what they had in Jurk way before Game 1. It only took 1 quarter of the Woffle game for us armchair coaches to see the guy, for whatever reason, injury maybe, head issues maybe, both maybe, can’t throw a competent football. So it’s at least a debate that he should have been hooked much earlier.
They just seemed Phil the best option at giving Pitt a chance to win at that particular time.
There is nothing comparable coaching at a program like Alabama compared to coaching at Pitt