Watching these games rooting for some of the teams makes you

[Sean Miller Fan]

realize how overrated some of these teams and leagues are. Like I'm rooting for these teams like they are Pitt, so I subconsciously compare them to "my team" as I watch them and they aren't as good.

- Dayton - horrible. Wouldnt finish higher than 14th in A10

- Creighton - unathletic YMCA dudes, WTF

- Marquette - give them a pass due to missing Kolek but they are a Top 15 team???

- UVa - rooting against them but they are ass

- Boise State -terrible. Bottom 4 team in ACC. Already lost to Clemson and VT. They wont beat this desperate UNM team

 

[pittjas]

Creighton is really good

 

[Sean Miller Fan]

This Boise team is so bad. If they lose this, I am not putting them in. 20-10? Get the eff out of here. Watched Duquesne and they are better for real. I dont see any way Boise can beat this UNM team. They are ASS

 

[whirlybird optio]

This Boise team is so bad. If they lose this, I am not putting them in. 20-10? Get the eff out of here. Watched Duquesne and they are better for real. I dont see any way Boise can beat this UNM team. They are ASS

6 Q1 wins they could lose by 100 it wouldn’t matter

 

[Sean Miller Fan]

6 Q1 wins they could lose by 100 it wouldn’t matter

Who were they against though?

2 were vs New Mexico
2 were vs SDSU (overrated)
SMC
@ Nevada

And they will end 20-10 (D2 games dont count). That's not enough for me especially considering some of those Q1 wins are only Q1 wins due to the other team gaming the NET.

 

[whirlybird optio]

Who were they against though?

2 were vs New Mexico
2 were vs SDSU (overrated)
SMC
@ Nevada

And they will end 20-10 (D2 games dont count). That's not enough for me especially considering some of those Q1 wins are only Q1 wins due to the other team gaming the NET.

Well, that’s 6 wins against teams in the field.

We have 2. (I’m counting UVA for us so I have to count New Mexico for them)

That’s the issue. We don’t have the wins.

It’s like the exact opposite of last year. Last year we had a lot of good wins, but terrible metrics, barely beat the bad teams, some truly bad losses.

This year, no Q4 losses, but only 2 wins against teams in the field.

 

[KennyTheKangaroo]

Creighton is really good

Agreed. So is Marquette

 

[Sean Miller Fan]

Well, that’s 6 wins against teams in the field.

We have 2. (I’m counting UVA for us so I have to count New Mexico for them)

That’s the issue. We don’t have the wins.

It’s like the exact opposite of last year. Last year we had a lot of good wins, but terrible metrics, barely beat the bad teams, some truly bad losses.

This year, no Q4 losses, but only 2 wins against teams in the field.

I get what you are saying but I, personally, am discounting the MWC and devaluing them for gaming. I believe our wins vs like NC State, BC, VT are as good or better than those. I have watched enough basketball in my life to know these teams arent good. Now, will Boise be safely in? Yea. But I dont think they or Dayton, or New Mexico make my field

 

[whirlybird optio]

I get what you are saying but I, personally, am discounting the MWC and devaluing them for gaming. I believe our wins vs like NC State, BC, VT are as good or better than those. I have watched enough basketball in my life to know these teams arent good. Now, will Boise be safely in? Yea. But I dont think they or Dayton, or New Mexico make my field

Oh I agree. And this Pitt team, it’s nuts. If they are a 10 seed with the right 2 seed, they could absolutely go to the Elite 8.

Tomorrow will be a fun game. Pitt won’t be intimidated. We are playing well and this UNC team can throw a clunker now and again .

 

[Sean Miller Fan]

Oh I agree. And this Pitt team, it’s nuts. If they are a 10 seed with the right 2 seed, they could absolutely go to the Elite 8.

Tomorrow will be a fun game. Pitt won’t be intimidated. We are playing well and this UNC team can throw a clunker now and again .

I'll tell you this, these 2 teams are better than Dayton. Dayton is stunningly bad.