Unless he signed elsewhere, he seems a better candidate than Schmidt, Becker, etc. But he's just dropped off the radar and all these non-descript mid-major guys have shown up. Not sure why.
Young, good recruiter in the ACC footprint, rebuilt Charleston. Trained under decent mentors.
Yeah, a good P-5 guy might draw more attention but this guy might be as solid as anyone, and maybe better upside than most.
Hopkins could be a one-deason rental. Enfield would cost big $ and also has an assistant under indictment Williard and Cooley have baggage with corrupt assistants in their past. Oats is exciting but a very shallow resume. High ceiling, but low floor.
With the top 15 offer for Hurley, lots of guys will probably pop up, but maybe Pitt already did some work on Grant.
This is going to be a long rebuild, but somebody has to start recruiting a roster quickly or the intramural champions are likely to be lining up against Duke next winter.,
Young, good recruiter in the ACC footprint, rebuilt Charleston. Trained under decent mentors.
Yeah, a good P-5 guy might draw more attention but this guy might be as solid as anyone, and maybe better upside than most.
Hopkins could be a one-deason rental. Enfield would cost big $ and also has an assistant under indictment Williard and Cooley have baggage with corrupt assistants in their past. Oats is exciting but a very shallow resume. High ceiling, but low floor.
With the top 15 offer for Hurley, lots of guys will probably pop up, but maybe Pitt already did some work on Grant.
This is going to be a long rebuild, but somebody has to start recruiting a roster quickly or the intramural champions are likely to be lining up against Duke next winter.,
