College recruiting, especially on the basketball side, is nothing but a sleazy market. It's all about cash and connections, in that order. Dixon simply refuses to engage, so he loses out on the top guys. It's no more complicated than that.
Because we don't cheat. Hope you don't have access to others' money.So if that's the case, he's not giving us the best chance to win, so why do we want him? Why not get a coach who is willing to do whatever it takes to compete at the highest level?
Because we don't cheat. Hope you don't have access to others' money.
That's not an unfair comeback, 79. Some good points. But we DID more than compete in BE hoops. Putting aside the current struggles, which are very disconcerting, isn't it fair to think that we can compete in most sports in the ACC w/o cheating?? Sure, it makes the task harder....but the satisfaction of doing it the right way should be greater, even if it means no dynastic runs, just solid results with some occasional magic. That's what I'd like to get to, now that my longheld dream of undefeated seasons in every sport appears to be unreachable.So then drop to a lower level where you have a chance to win big without cheating, because you are pretty certain that the others aren't cheating either. I'd be totally fine with joining the Ivy League and dropping the "Power 5" charade. I don't see the point of being at the highest level and playing hamstrung, because your opponents are willing to do all kind of things you refuse to do. Unless it's all about just cashing the big TV check, even if you suck on the field getting destroyed by the cheaters every year? I'd rather win the I-AA 16 team playoff than go 6-7 in the next Weedeater Bowl every year, while the "Blue Bloods" in our league cheat their way into the Big Playoffs and Final 4s.
Well, some teams ARE punished....Memphis/UCONN/Cuse, etc. 2 wrongs don't make a "right". Perhaps you should switch allegiance to Laroche or Geneva College?? The new boss is the same as the old boss......no cheating tolerated. Who knows, maybe Jamie would cheat if he thought his boss would approve?? Doubt it, but the facts are clear.....we're trying to win w/o that. Fine by me.I don't see the point of literally playing Washington Generals to Coach K and Coach Cal's Globetrotters, while they stand at the podium holding up the trophy and cutting down the nets every year and never really get punished for anything. I don't feel any satisfaction in "doing it right", what's "right" if they are rewarded, never punished and to the victors go the spoils?
Well, some teams ARE punished....Memphis/UCONN/Cuse, etc. 2 wrongs don't make a "right". Perhaps you should switch allegiance to Laroche or Geneva College?? The new boss is the same as the old boss......no cheating tolerated. Who knows, maybe Jamie would cheat if he thought his boss would approve?? Doubt it, but the facts are clear.....we're trying to win w/o that. Fine by me.
Good point! Playing "by the rules" and sucking is worse punishment than missing a post season or vacating a few wins or losing a couple schollies, LOL!We are being punished now... Look at the product on the floor!!!
So you don't care....it's your choice. But I care, and I'm not alone. You'd probably brag about it to your friends. Sad commentary.Good point! Playing "by the rules" and sucking is worse punishment than missing a post season or vacating a few wins or losing a couple schollies, LOL!
You know too, if Duke for example was guilty of cheating RIGHT NOW, you know they'd cover it up, they'd hate the public perception of vacating a current title. 'Cuse may have cheated for their title and surely some of the recent UNC titles where products of cheating, but you know what? Punishing them with slaps on the wrist, years later, they still have the banners and the memories, nobody cares.
Damn right I would brag about it! Just like the Duke fans, the 'Cuse fans, the KY fans, the UNC fans, you name it are all still bragging about their titles and not putting *asterisks next to anything and nobody cares!So you don't care....it's your choice. But I care, and I'm not alone. You'd probably brag about it to your friends. Sad commentary.
Kiwiprobably doesn't help either that you can only count to three.
Kiwi, are you still hanging around, you seem to be following my posts don't you have anything better to do yes JD needs to go, he earned thatprobably doesn't help either that you can only count to three.
Kiwi. Are you still hangin around? Seems like you are following my posts. Don't you have anything better to do, you never know what you are talking about. Have you ever read some of the stuff you write, none of it makes any sense, you really don't know what you are talking about, the only thing I can make out is the fact that you settle for mediocrity and you're happy with that, I really think you are a nitter especially in football, I want Pitt to win and win it all and after the last 4 years we headed downward so if JD does get fired, he earned that rightprobably doesn't help either that you can only count to three.
I don't post on the football board. Understand that? I see the new format has you befuddled.Kiwi. Are you still hangin around? Seems like you are following my posts. Don't you have anything better to do, you never know what you are talking about. Have you ever read some of the stuff you write, none of it makes any sense, you really don't know what you are talking about, the only thing I can make out is the fact that you settle for mediocrity and you're happy with that, I really think you are a nitter especially in football, I want Pitt to win and win it all and after the last 4 years we headed downward so if JD does get fired, he earned that right
I don't post on the football board. Understand that? I see the new format has you befuddled.
Winning along with good coaching breed good recruits. One poster says Pitt will never be a top program and get the top recruits. I disagree completely. Bring in a top 10-15 coach and he will bring quality recruits to the program. If Sean Miller came to Pitt tomorrow do you not believe he would make a immediate impact with recruits. No question a top level coach could change the landscape immediately.
IMO..... JD is not a top notch coach. He is decent and better than average but not one of the top tier college coaches. His style and personality on the sideline looks out of control and almost comes off as over coaching the players. Pitt players as a whole on many occasions look tight and afraid to make a mistake. All his intensity seems to create a lot of uneasy tension in his players. Personally I do not like his style of coaching and may be a issue with some recruits and parents.
He would be better to tone it down and let the kids play.
To be successful on the college level it's a two way street. Not only do you have to have a very high skilled coach who can keep cool and show leadership on game days but a guy who can connect with parents and recruits. This is where JD is not skilled and it is really beginning to show. Pitt plays in one of the best basketball conferences in the country and should have no issues in recruiting. The same situation exists for SEC Football where all the best players want to go. Pitt should have plenty of talent knocking at the door to choose from. This is what is so unusual about the current state of the program, no one is knocking. Most of all the other ACC schools are getting their fair share of decent talent but not Pitt.
Very strange situation or is it Jamie Dixon. Yes, as many have mentioned we do not have good assistants who can recruit but I have to believe it is more JD and his personality. He just does not come across as a cool collected coach based on his recent record and side line demeanor.
I things get worse before they get better. JD will need to adjust his style and make changes.
TWinning along with good coaching breed good recruits. One poster says Pitt will never be a top program and get the top recruits. I disagree completely. Bring in a top 10-15 coach and he will bring quality recruits to the program. If Sean Miller came to Pitt tomorrow do you not believe he would make a immediate impact with recruits. No question a top level coach could change the landscape immediately.
IMO..... JD is not a top notch coach. He is decent and better than average but not one of the top tier college coaches. His style and personality on the sideline looks out of control and almost comes off as over coaching the players. Pitt players as a whole on many occasions look tight and afraid to make a mistake. All his intensity seems to create a lot of uneasy tension in his players. Personally I do not like his style of coaching and may be a issue with some recruits and parents.
He would be better to tone it down and let the kids play.
To be successful on the college level it's a two way street. Not only do you have to have a very high skilled coach who can keep cool and show leadership on game days but a guy who can connect with parents and recruits. This is where JD is not skilled and it is really beginning to show. Pitt plays in one of the best basketball conferences in the country and should have no issues in recruiting. The same situation exists for SEC Football where all the best players want to go. Pitt should have plenty of talent knocking at the door to choose from. This is what is so unusual about the current state of the program, no one is knocking. Most of all the other ACC schools are getting their fair share of decent talent but not Pitt.
Very strange situation or is it Jamie Dixon. Yes, as many have mentioned we do not have good assistants who can recruit but I have to believe it is more JD and his personality. He just does not come across as a cool collected coach based on his recent record and side line demeanor.
I things get worse before they get better. JD will need to adjust his style and make changes.
It's not "luck" when it has become a trend. He/They have failed at identifying players w/ a high upside. I feel because they have gone to more of a size/look rather than a bball IQ tact. JJ Moore might have had the "look" but he had the bball IQ of a 8 year old.
Not true Doc HC Carlson 1922 - 1953 367-248 2 Helms national championships 1928 and 1930 and 1 ncaa final 4 1941. Glory years? Are you referring to the CBI championship and the NIT one and done over the last four yrs of these glorious yearsWhat top 15 head coach is coming to Pitt? NO ONE IS THE ANWSER. First thing is you need 10million to buy out JD then probably 4/5 mil per year for 5 yrs.for the hc then more for the assistants that's at least 25 million so Pitt can attract a better student Athlete . Not going to happen. Yes things need to improve but remember the University of Pittsburgh is an educational institution not a pro sports franchise . All you who are panicking remember this is still the winningest head coach in Pitts history and these last 10 yrs have been the glory years of the program.
Doc's winning % was under 60%. Jamie's over 70%. If he goes 60% for 19 more years, he'll have around 670 wins.T
Not true Doc HC Carlson 1922 - 1953 367-248 2 Helms national championships 1928 and 1930 and 1 ncaa final 4 1941. Glory years? Are you referring to the CBI championship and the NIT one and done over the last four yrs of these glorious years