What record does this starting roster get you?

[Pitt666]

Jackson
Corhen
Huff
Bell
Cummings

 

[Sam Young 23]

500 or a game or 2 over

 

[Sean Miller Fan]

500 or a game or 2 over

Agreed though I'd say that the ACC is such that after Duke, Lou, and Will Wade, if you have some luck and the team seems to "fit," it could mess around and make the NCAAT....or finish 3-17. These are all 1 year AAU teams so you never really know.

 

[gary2]

500 or a game or 2 over

Doubt that Corhen and Bell in particular are far from complete players. I don't know that they are even winning players. Both provide nothing except scoring.

 

[TheWerewolfFromTwilight]

Agreed though I'd say that the ACC is such that after Duke, Lou, and Will Wade, if you have some luck and the team seems to "fit," it could mess around and make the NCAAT....or finish 3-17. These are all 1 year AAU teams so you never really know.

Unless you've got a pretty talented roster, the best you can hope to be each season is, like, Wake Forest.

25-10 (13-7) - 5th place
19-14 (11-9) - 7th place
21-14 (10-10) - 8th place
21-11 (13-7) - 6th place

0 NCAAT bids, but is it reasonable to expect Pitt, seemingly hindered by a poor coach, to do any better than that with the level of talent we're likely to bring in most seasons? Finding a roster that is the "right fit," given the type of players we are bringing in, would basically produce something akin to these results.

 

[9782978]

Still need to replace Blake and Bub to be competitive, i.e., above or well above .500 in ACC. The group listed is 5 ACC wins or less, I’m afraid.