Bubby Brister and Tim Worley were the next saviors for Steelers fans.......well
Get over it. Just because a kid doesn't go to Pitt you put him on this list? Come on
Again, I think you are confused about what the word overrated means. It doesn't mean someone sucks. It means they are valued more than what they are worth. Kendall was exact that. Dan Marino was not overrated - his teams probably never even make the playoffs without him.
Serious question - Would you take Jason Kendall over Gregory Polanco as the first person to build your team around? What about Starlin Marte? Neither of those guys are super stars (at least not yet), but if I'm building a team I'd want either over in his prime Kendall. Context is your friend if you bother to use it.
But he wasn't without those two. You could say that about any great athlete.Terry Bradshaw without Swan and Stallworth
No, it's pretty clear that you don't understand what the word means. You think that Kendall was overrated because he was never the centerpiece of a championship team. It's like the concept that Kendall could be a good player who played with crappy teammates never enters your mind. It's a team sport. One guy, no matter how good, can't turn a crappy team into a contender. Not when Jason Kendall played for the Pirates and not for any other player ever in history. Dan Marino may very well be the best quarterback in NFL history and even he wasn't good enough to lead mediocre teams to a championship. In most years they didn't even really get all that close. Because one guy, no matter how good, can't do it all by himself.
It's funny that you use the line "context is your friend" when you seem to have no concept of context what so ever. Through the age of 26 (which Polanco hasn't gotten to yet) Kendall was a much better player than either Polanco or Marte has been. MUCH better. But we know that in 2001 Jason Kendall broke a bone in his hand and played with it most of the season, and we know that Jason Kendall was never the same kind of hitter after that season. You keep calling Kendall a singles hitter, and yet we know that before 2001 he put up slugging percentages of .473, .511 and .470 in three consecutive seasons, and we also know that in the combined eight major league seasons of Marte and Polanco (not counting this year yet, although neither of them is there at this early stage this season either) that neither one of them has ever had a season with a slugging percentage as high as .470. If all we knew about those three guys was what they had done by the time they had their age 26 seasons in the major leagues then the correct choice is to take Jason Kendall. In fact because Kendall plays the much more important defensive position it isn't even close.
Anyone who would take either Marte or Polanco based on their careers through age 26 over Kendall is an idiot. A complete, utter idiot. But of course because of the context we know what happened to Kendall next. He got hurt. He was never the same player again. So of course you would take either Marte or Polanco over Kendall right now, because we know what happened to Kendall and we don't know what's going to happen with the other two. But you aren't taking Marte or Polanco because they have been better players than Kendall was at similar points of their careers, because that is obviously not the case. Or at least it's obvious to anyone who actually does understand context.
He wasn't a super star player. He was hailed as a super star player locally even after his injury (to suggest otherwise is disingenuous at best) thus overrated, which is the entire point of the thread and the basis of my comments. Everything else is irrelevant.
Bettis is special because of his durability and how long he played, specific to the style of runner he was. Such a physical back that played for what? 13 years? 6 years in a row for steelers with 1000k plus and in 97 would have the season record if he played last game.
He didn't have the break away runs when the game was out of doubt which defined Barry sanders career, which makes these stats even more impressive.
No, it's pretty clear that you don't understand what the word means. You think that Kendall was overrated because he was never the centerpiece of a championship team. It's like the concept that Kendall could be a good player who played with crappy teammates never enters your mind. It's a team sport. One guy, no matter how good, can't turn a crappy team into a contender. Not when Jason Kendall played for the Pirates and not for any other player ever in history. Dan Marino may very well be the best quarterback in NFL history and even he wasn't good enough to lead mediocre teams to a championship. In most years they didn't even really get all that close. Because one guy, no matter how good, can't do it all by himself.
It's funny that you use the line "context is your friend" when you seem to have no concept of context what so ever. Through the age of 26 (which Polanco hasn't gotten to yet) Kendall was a much better player than either Polanco or Marte has been. MUCH better. But we know that in 2001 Jason Kendall broke a bone in his hand and played with it most of the season, and we know that Jason Kendall was never the same kind of hitter after that season. You keep calling Kendall a singles hitter, and yet we know that before 2001 he put up slugging percentages of .473, .511 and .470 in three consecutive seasons, and we also know that in the combined eight major league seasons of Marte and Polanco (not counting this year yet, although neither of them is there at this early stage this season either) that neither one of them has ever had a season with a slugging percentage as high as .470. If all we knew about those three guys was what they had done by the time they had their age 26 seasons in the major leagues then the correct choice is to take Jason Kendall. In fact because Kendall plays the much more important defensive position it isn't even close.
Anyone who would take either Marte or Polanco based on their careers through age 26 over Kendall is an idiot. A complete, utter idiot. But of course because of the context we know what happened to Kendall next. He got hurt. He was never the same player again. So of course you would take either Marte or Polanco over Kendall right now, because we know what happened to Kendall and we don't know what's going to happen with the other two. But you aren't taking Marte or Polanco because they have been better players than Kendall was at similar points of their careers, because that is obviously not the case. Or at least it's obvious to anyone who actually does understand context.
Justin King
Lamont Wade
Robert Foster
If you are looking for a recent Pirate to put on the list it's clearly Jack Wilson. This town had a hard on for him, and he was a little above average fielding, below average hitting shortstop. Guys like him are a dime a dozen, but too many people in this town thought he was something special.
Overrated because of all the hype of how great he would've been amongst media types.
Senor Sack maybe been a great player or he may have been Huey Richardson, we have no way of no knowing.
LOL, good list. I was actually thinking JayBay too but didn't mention him.. Regarding Johnny Ray, as a little kid, I LOVED him, thought he was the best ever.. Looked up his career stats not too long ago, lets just say he was not the best second basemen in history..Here are some names and thoughts.
Kordell Stewart.
Leonard Timmons
Jason Gildon
Alex Kovalev
Gary Roberts
Jason Bay
Johnny Ray
Garrit Cole
Mark Melancon
Cutch had us excited because for 3 - 4 years, he was putting up ALl star, MVP like numbers. avg was well into the .310s, he was hitting high 20's HRs while playing incredible center field..Kendall was a above average major league catcher. He was a borderline all star but got picked for 3 because the team around him sucked so bad that he was the best choice and every team needed a invite. He was vastly overrated by most pirate fans because he was all they had. So he could make the list because most pirate fans looked at him as a borderline HOF type when he was just a good major league catcher. Cutch is similar only he is a little better player but not a HOF like many pirate fans thought until last year.
I blame unimaginative coaches for Kordell Stewart. Similar to Greg Cross.LOL, good list. I was actually thinking JayBay too but didn't mention him.. Regarding Johnny Ray, as a little kid, I LOVED him, thought he was the best ever.. Looked up his career stats not too long ago, lets just say he was not the best second basemen in history..
I liked kovalev until we brought him back the second time, tarnished my image of him. reason #1 why I hate the "rent-a-player for the playoff run" strategy so popular in hockey and baseball.
Gary Roberts had a nice playoff run and went out on top, I respect that.. Who is Leonard Timmons?
I blame his inability to hit an open WR to save his life.. he was not an NFL QB. he was given too many opportunities and proven time and again, his accuracy was beyond poor..I blame unimaginative coaches for Kordell Stewart. Similar to Greg Cross.![]()
LOL, good list. I was actually thinking JayBay too but didn't mention him.. Regarding Johnny Ray, as a little kid, I LOVED him, thought he was the best ever.. Looked up his career stats not too long ago, lets just say he was not the best second basemen in history..
I liked kovalev until we brought him back the second time, tarnished my image of him. reason #1 why I hate the "rent-a-player for the playoff run" strategy so popular in hockey and baseball.
Gary Roberts had a nice playoff run and went out on top, I respect that.. Who is Leonard Timmons?
any chance you guys can stop listing HOFers as being over-rated?i said marc andre fleury in the pens thread, which caused one poster to go into full meltdown mode
if not him, who?
i think an argument can be made for jerome bettis, who else?
That's because his coaches stubbornly tried to make him into Neil O DonnellI blame his inability to hit an open WR to save his life.. he was not an NFL QB. he was given too many opportunities and proven time and again, his accuracy was beyond poor..
Frustrating too because some of those teams were sick and with even an avg QB, we'd have had more shots at a superbowl. that 97 team, with even an average qb, walks into the superbowl. 2001, same thing..
what did you want him to do, run the option? Sometimes a forward pass is needed in the NFL..That's because his coaches stubbornly tried to make him into Neil O Donnell
Ralph Kiner.
Pierre larouche
Jason Kendall
Matt Benson
Bobby bonilla
I literally have heard no Steeler fan anywhere at any time make that claim (Bubby-wise)...Bubby Brister and Tim Worley were the next saviors for Steelers fans.......well
I just looked up his stats, he had 2 years with the buccos where he hit over 50 HRs and had a .300+ batting average. his stats are sick. ironically enough, once he left Pittsburgh, his stats fell dramatically. he did come back here for a year and did poorly then left again..yeah, but who didn't? Good for him that he played (if you know what I mean) post WW2 when advancements in antibiotics were of great assistance to lucky fellas that got around....
Bruno Samartino. It has recently come to my attention that a fairly substantial portion of his many titles may have had less to to with his actual athletic prowess and may have, to some degree, been staged and possibly pre-determined. .i said marc andre fleury in the pens thread, which caused one poster to go into full meltdown mode
if not him, who?
i think an argument can be made for jerome bettis, who else?
Lol, post of this whole thread. Well done.Bruno Samartino. It has recently come to my attention that a fairly substantial portion of his many titles may have had less to to with his actual athletic prowess and may have, to some degree, been staged and possibly pre-determined. .
See reply #67Can not believe it took over 125 entries to finally get to Kordell Stewart.
Matter of fact, yes. He was very effective doing that his first couple years.what did you want him to do, run the option? Sometimes a forward pass is needed in the NFL..