Ask penn state.As an outsider I've always wondered why there's no annual series. I'm an Iowa fan and I think we're basically required to play ISU by the regents. The 2 schools are relatively close and it'd make sense to keep the money in-state.
Is it purely bad blood?
Actually just saw on the PSU board a thread about this. They claim they don't need us, but we need them. Apparently because our athletic department has no money and it would be a waste of time for them.Both schools are "state related" not 100% state run/funded. That is one obstacle. A second is too many PSU alums live in the state who aren't supportive of a renewal of the rivalry. This translates into not enough political interest if forcing the game to be played.
It's a shame.
What's funny is they really think Temple is some powerhouse now. They have a Penn State alum as coach, so they're obviously the best non P5 team in the country. I'm not making this up, they really think Temple is that good.They'd rather build their instate rivalry with Temple though now that Temple finally punched the bully back they'll likely stop playing them after the current series ends too. Maybe Bucknell or IUP will be next?
We can't keep enough elected officials in Pennsylvania in jail at one time so we are forced to keep them in office or on PSU's Board of Directors. Crap in, crap out.As an outsider I've always wondered why there's no annual series. I'm an Iowa fan and I think we're basically required to play ISU by the regents. The 2 schools are relatively close and it'd make sense to keep the money in-state.
Is it purely bad blood?
As an outsider I've always wondered why there's no annual series. I'm an Iowa fan and I think we're basically required to play ISU by the regents. The 2 schools are relatively close and it'd make sense to keep the money in-state.
Is it purely bad blood?
As you said, the dynamic you explained WILL change. Perhaps a bit of enlightenment on the reasons that forced PSU's hand to drop it in the 90's? (Oh and lol on the "interesting" OOC opponent in State College comment.)The dynamic, as I'm sure you well know as an Iowa Hawkeye fan, is about to change as we go to a 9-game conference schedule.
All B1G schools will ideally be wanting 7 home games per year. 9 conference games means room for only 1 home-and-home every year, then 2 buy games per year.
Iowa of course plays ISU every year. Unless you either (a) don't play 7 home games in a year, or (b) get away from that Iowa State series being annual, you will never again see an interesting non-Cyclone OOC opponent in Iowa City.
Penn State plays Pittsburgh in the 2016-2019 time frame, but I don't want it to be annual beyond that. A couple times every decade, sure. But if it becomes annual --- we'll become like you guys with Iowa State, never again seeing an interesting non-Panther OOC opponent in State College.
Very interesting their OOC schedule this year...lmfao.As you said, the dynamic you explained WILL change. Perhaps a bit of enlightenment on the reasons that forced PSU's hand to drop it in the 90's? (Oh and lol on the "interesting" OOC opponent in State College comment.)
As you said, the dynamic you explained WILL change. Perhaps a bit of enlightenment on the reasons that forced PSU's hand to drop it in the 90's? (Oh and lol on the "interesting" OOC opponent in State College comment.)
Yep exactly the thread I was talking about. It's amazing how these people's minds work over there.Here's the link to that thread. I replied to their claims in an adult way. Can't wait to see how I get crushed over there...
http://bwi.forums.rivals.com/threads/we-dont-need-pitt.40423/#post-537534
LOL. Ok. Unless I'm wrong the thread was about why Pitt/PSU don't play each other annually, right? Don't think anyone (including yourself who responded) is "obsessing".Scheduling contracts require a mutual agreement, and Penn State did not think it was in its best interests to continue with an annual series after 1992. Nothing "forced our hand", it was simply Penn State's decision.
We're on each other's schedules in each of 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019. I look forward to those games and I look forward to the future. Fair enough if one wants to obsess about the past, and the specific role of now-departed individuals in our series not continuing after 1992.
I don't think this is debatable, but fair enough if you disagree: Pittsburgh fans care more about the lack of a series than Penn State fans care.
Do you think Penn State fans care more about teams like Buffalo, SDSU, UMASS, E. MICH, etc. that they do PITT? Penn State is supposed to be one of the "blue bloods" of CFB, why not play a schedule reflective of that instead of using low-quality wins as a compass for the direction of the program?
Simple...Bitter old man...As an outsider I've always wondered why there's no annual series. I'm an Iowa fan and I think we're basically required to play ISU by the regents. The 2 schools are relatively close and it'd make sense to keep the money in-state.
Is it purely bad blood?
As an outsider I've always wondered why there's no annual series. I'm an Iowa fan and I think we're basically required to play ISU by the regents. The 2 schools are relatively close and it'd make sense to keep the money in-state.
Is it purely bad blood?
I don't think this is debatable, but fair enough if you disagree: Pittsburgh fans care more about the lack of a series than Penn State fans care.
Scheduling contracts require a mutual agreement, and Penn State did not think it was in its best interests to continue with an annual series after 1992. Nothing "forced our hand", it was simply Penn State's decision.
We're on each other's schedules in each of 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019. I look forward to those games and I look forward to the future. Fair enough if one wants to obsess about the past, and the specific role of now-departed individuals in our series not continuing after 1992.
Being truthful, I really dont care to see the Pitt/PSU game being annually. Its really just another game no different than playing Iowa. PSU has pretty much been a mediocre regional team for a few decades (almost as long as Pitt) and the campus is based in the middle of nowhere with absolutely nothing to do. Beaver Stadium is also a large high school stadium in terms of quality (and not the new Texas HS stadium kind) with a gas station for "amenities", bleacher seats, and cow shit in the parking lots.
Ultimately, Pitt would want the game for the financial benefit and frankly that is about it. PSU has one of the largest student and alumni bases because of the community colleges PSU operates. Franklin's track record at Vanderbilt was to schedule very poor opponents OOC to collect wins, which also has been PSUs strategy as well with playing typically one of the weakest OOC schedules in college football. With the Big10 going to only 3 OOC games to protect their teams, Penn State will be attempting to get 3 home games every other year...which means buying wins from weak teams willing to give that to them (Temple being a good example from a non-P5, though that series could disappear given the results in this years game).
Pitt needs to play more national teams than Penn State in hopefully better locations worth traveling too and less "redneckish" given the secluded/cultish area of Pennsyltucky where State College resides. Will also be good to not have to return there given the way some of my black friends were treated in years past there. Was eye opening sadly.
"Being truthful, I really don't care to see the Pitt/PSU game being annually. Its really just another game no different than playing Iowa"....but yet you pen three paragraphs disparaging (correctly, I might add) them. With all due respect, I don't think you are being truthful at all. You do care. Let the hate out for it is good.
I hear what you're saying, and Temple is definitely on the major upswing compared to where they were. They are not though, and I quote someone on the PSU board, "better than everyone on Pitt's nonconference schedule."Well, ask Cincy if Temple is good.
The Iowa-Iowa State series resumed back in 1977 and alternates yearly. This year was in Ames and next in Iowa City.For the Iowa-Iowa State game. How many games have been played at each school?
PSU should go "out west" and play teams like BYU and Utah.As you well know, those are all buy games. Buy games will nearly universally come from non-Power 5 conferences.
Since 2005, Penn State has played neutral site or home-and-home series with UCF, Syracuse, Virginia, Temple, Alabama and Notre Dame. In 2016-2019, we will play Pittsburgh. I do wish we had a little more geographic diversity in the OOC schedule (e.g., schedule a series which takes us out west), but overall I'm comfortable with our OOC schedule over the last decade.
ask Cincy if Cincy is good....Well, ask Cincy if Temple is good.
So tired of PSU's unwarranted arrogance. Since 2000, PSU has just 7 more wins than Pitt.
Sick of them as well. Someone on their board yesterday literally said 12-0 in 2000 was the biggest win in the history of our program and that was their worst team ever. You really can't make this stuff up. Worst team ever? Where was he just 3-4 years later in 2003 and 2004? Not to mention we've had much bigger wins before and after that game.So tired of PSU's unwarranted arrogance. Since 2000, PSU has just 7 more wins than Pitt.