Notice how they only give Alabama and Notre Dame a home and home. Syracuse has to do a 2 for 1. Oregon State had to go to crappy valley, we know there is NO WAY PoSU would ever go there. And the only reason they played at Virginia I'm sure was because of the recruiting area in Virginia.
I'm "comfortable" with it. I am not "thrilled" with it, but I understand the thinking.
I am not a PSU fan who likes to use the sanctions as a "crutch", but the OOC schedules being lessened in the 2013-2015 era makes sense in that context. We were expected to be a considerably weaker team, so if you're still trying to win you need to schedule weaker foes. San Diego State was scheduled in August 2013: there were NO sanctions reductions at all as of that moment. Army was scheduled in early September 2014: the bowl ban had not been reduced as of that moment.
Scheduling UCF and getting the "pseudo-Bowl game in Ireland that would also double as a nice trip for PSU fans" also made sense in the context of the sanctions. I admit the Dublin game for what it was: a way to get a "Bowl Game" despite the NCAA Bowl ban. And as one who made the trip to Ireland, I'm glad that we did that. I had a good time.
Anyway, the sanctions are now over, and in the 2016 and beyond era, I expect one Power 5 OOC foe on a yearly basis. I doubt it will ever be two Power 5 OOC foes, as we are seemingly "required" (rolls eyes) to have seven home games a year. But that is what it is and a whole different story.
FWIW, the details of the 5-4 OOC record vs. Power 5 schools in the 2005-2015 era:
0-2 vs. Alabama (2010, 2011)
1-1 vs. Notre Dame (2006, 2007)
3-0 vs. Syracuse (2008, 2009, 2013)
1-0 vs. Oregon State (2008)
0-1 vs. Virginia (2012)
There was at least one in every year in the 2006-2013 era. There were none in 2005, but PSU did play Cincinnati and South Florida, which had just joined the Big East, which did have an automatic BCS bid.