The basic fallacy of this column is that Pitt fans - or fans of any bowl team - are supporting their team by attending one of these minor bowl games. In fact, they are supporting the tourism industry of the cities that host the games.
True. However:The basic fallacy of this column is that Pitt fans - or fans of any bowl team - are supporting their team by attending one of these minor bowl games. In fact, they are supporting the tourism industry of the cities that host the games.
That is the marketing gimmick that these bowls use. They pick teams based on the ability of the teams to bring fans to the games. They do not care if the games themselves are interesting. All that matters is that the fans attend and buy tickets, rent hotel rooms, and eat restaurant meals. And they sell the idea to fans that their attendance at these games helps their teams. The game itself is not as important - it is supporting your team that matters. Who cares if a 5-7 team is playing a 6-6 team, in a game that no one wants to see.
The basic fallacy of this column is that Pitt fans - or fans of any bowl team - are supporting their team by attending one of these minor bowl games. In fact, they are supporting the tourism industry of the cities that host the games.
That is the marketing gimmick that these bowls use. They pick teams based on the ability of the teams to bring fans to the games. They do not care if the games themselves are interesting. All that matters is that the fans attend and buy tickets, rent hotel rooms, and eat restaurant meals. And they sell the idea to fans that their attendance at these games helps their teams. The game itself is not as important - it is supporting your team that matters. Who cares if a 5-7 team is playing a 6-6 team, in a game that no one wants to see.
The basic fallacy of this column is that Pitt fans - or fans of any bowl team - are supporting their team by attending one of these minor bowl games. In fact, they are supporting the tourism industry of the cities that host the games.
That is the marketing gimmick that these bowls use. They pick teams based on the ability of the teams to bring fans to the games. They do not care if the games themselves are interesting. All that matters is that the fans attend and buy tickets, rent hotel rooms, and eat restaurant meals. And they sell the idea to fans that their attendance at these games helps their teams. The game itself is not as important - it is supporting your team that matters. Who cares if a 5-7 team is playing a 6-6 team, in a game that no one wants to see.
if this were entirely true, why would th RA Bowl select Miami? They wont sell any hotel rooms... they're 3 hours away. Miami already doesnt travel well, and the fans that do go will just drive to the game and go home.The basic fallacy of this column is that Pitt fans - or fans of any bowl team - are supporting their team by attending one of these minor bowl games. In fact, they are supporting the tourism industry of the cities that host the games.
That is the marketing gimmick that these bowls use. They pick teams based on the ability of the teams to bring fans to the games. They do not care if the games themselves are interesting. All that matters is that the fans attend and buy tickets, rent hotel rooms, and eat restaurant meals. And they sell the idea to fans that their attendance at these games helps their teams. The game itself is not as important - it is supporting your team that matters. Who cares if a 5-7 team is playing a 6-6 team, in a game that no one wants to see.
Zeise's article got one thing wrong.
Zeise's article got one thing wrong.
Shady wasnt on the 2009 team that played in Charlotte. That was Dion Lewis' freshman year.
Well that I will certainly be doing. I get not everyone can make it all the time, but too many people chose not to make an easy trip to Heinz field on Saturday's (depending where you live)Also, Zeise stated pitt fans need to show up next year to support the team that doesn't have a penn state or a notre Dame on its schedule .
Which is absolutely true.
This is the right answer. There should be like 10 bowls total and that's it, a damn joke is bowl season , and that has nothing to do with Pitt. Reward a 6-6 football team , is the everyone gets a trophy mentality
So called Pitt fans, Alumni, and students full of excuses.
Are you going to the bowl game?So called Pitt fans, Alumni, and students full of excuses.
I've been to numerous Pitt bowl games and even the crappy ones put on a good time. It's well worth the trip IMO if you are on the fence about going.
As for moving the program forward, fan support is HUGE in college athletics. Our fanbase just doesn't get it and wonders why Pitt can't fully move forward.
Has the admin done things wrong? Absolutely. But the one thing us as fans can fix is the support, and many refuse to do it.
if this were entirely true, why would th RA Bowl select Miami? They wont sell any hotel rooms... they're 3 hours away. Miami already doesnt travel well, and the fans that do go will just drive to the game and go home.
Same thing with the Taxslayer and GT. Atlanta is close enough to Jax that the GT fans that go to the game arent getting any hotel rooms.
In both cases, even 4000-5000 Pitt fans wouldve done more for the "tourism" industry of Orlando and Jax than Miami or GT.
Who cares if a 5-7 team is playing a 6-6 team, in a game that no one wants to see.
You are correct they are never going to reduce bowl games even though I think they should. And despite with Paco says the bowl season is BS as well as the CFP. The bowls are supposed be about rewearding the teams not the sponsors and bowl cities.Newsflash Yinzers waiting for "less bowls"... THERE ARE NOT GOING TO BE LESS BOWLS
Please get over this already the trends of the past 30 years speak for themselves....it's not going back
Quit crying about bowl games stop it....
Bowl games are fun ...people complaining about them aren't ..
Ron Cook retire and take this stupid bowl game attitude with you....
some people are happy about nyc, some are mad. that's how this works. If we went to sun bowl, some would be happy, some would be mad. if we went to Orlando, some would be happy, some would be mad..
I've read on this board that NW is boring, would rather play a Stanford. rumors about sun bowl came up, people complained about the venue and El paso sucking, mainly me I admit..
others said that they want no parts of a backyard brawl in Orlando, because they'd shred our pass defense. You cant make everyone happy. people value different things. some people like nyc at Christmas, some people want sun, some people value a P5 opponent, some want cheap flights. there is no agreed consensus on this. No venue or bowl would appease us all. Its not yinzer, it's not pitt fans, it human beings valuing different things.
Is PITT ever going to compete with PSU or OSU for attendance, absolutely not. The PSU undergraduate base is almost 3 times that of PITT, where OSU is about 2 times as much. What PITT can do with solid seasons on the field, and retaining a winning coaching staff is regularly see 60,000 fans show up for their games.
you guys need to get with me on my mindset here about bowl games. Think of them as just a single game, void of any connection with the regular season, just another opportunity to see our boys play. Think of this as a cool mini-vacation, a chance to get drunk at a sports bar in a different city while wearing your pitt gear. A chance to try and get some strange in a different city before heading back to your life in Pittsburgh, nothing more.The only good, driveable bowls we've been to since Majors II were the Charlotte bowls and both came after Big East Championship Game home losses in which we were playing for the Orange Bowl against Miami one year and the Sugar Bowl against Cincy. And of those games was the dreaded Dec. 26, in the afternoon to boot. I am sorry but no Pitt fans (or any fans) are going to skip Christmas for bowl game that amounts to the NIT after you lost a Championship game in the most crushing of manners.
Can you please keep fighting the good fight w/ the Ja'postles too? Thank you for your service!letstalkaboutnext year, the biggest looney tune out there.
Pitt is not even going to get 60K if we consistently win. And I dont' think anyone expects to compete with PSU or OSU. What I would expect is that more than 25-30K people show up to home games vs Duke and Syracuse that just came off of a win vs Clemson, was well on their way to a top 25 ranking, and had one of the most fun offenses in the country to watch.
I just looked up that '09 season, I think your avg 53k was a tad high originally but maybe not by much. we had some good crowds.I agree to a point; having an absolutely terrible turnout following the Clemson win was puzzling.
In 2009, when PITT was consistently winning and in contention for the BE title, they averaged 53K fans. Maybe 60K is a little high, but getting close is a possibility with a retention of coaches who are improving the program and winning on the field.
I get why people, epecially those with young kids that are active in athletics or whatever, don't go to games. A lot of those events happen on Saturdays. When my kids were young, and involved in community soccer, my Saturday's were spent driving from one kid's game to another. I wasn't choosing Pitt football over my kids' games, no matter what. Excuse? Valid reason? That lies in the eyes of the beholder, but it was what it was.
Georgia Tech was a nice enough day.Weather and timing plays a role too. we had 2 nice days this year....rib fest and psu. not an excuse for me but fair weather fans look for anything
I just looked up that '09 season, I think your avg 53k was a tad high originally but maybe not by much. we had some good crowds.
Sat. Sep. 5 1:00 p.m. Youngstown State* W 38–3 48,497
Sat. Sep. 19 6:00 p.m. Navy* W 27–14 55,064
Sat. Oct. 24 12:00 p.m. South FloridaW 41–14 50,019![]()
Sat. Nov. 7 12:00 p.m. Syracuse No. 14 W 37–10 46,885
Sat. Nov. 14 8:00 p.m. Notre Dame* No. 8 W 27–22 65,374
Sat. Oct. 10 3:30 p.m. Connecticut W 24–21 44,839
Sat. Dec. 5 12:00 p.m. No. 5 Cincinnati No. 14 L 44–45 63,387