2025 could be brutal
- By chethejet
- Between Fifth And Forbes
- 34 Replies
This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.
Since you mentioned Billy Napier, some friends and I were at the Ole Miss/Florida game yesterday. We all are Pitt fans for 40 or so years. Being at a place like that you come to the realization that Pitt will never be truly relevant again…..for various reasons.actually that brings to mind the Syracuse fiasco last year. A coach on his way to being fired and no QB rolled to a win.
There really is enough evidence to make a coaching change. But in this new era, even the football crazy schools aren't jettisoning their coaches (Brian Kelly, Napier, Venables are probably all coming back).
Narduzzi is starting to remind me of Wannstedt. Give him the talent, and he won't screw it up. But unless he has more talent at each of the 22 positions, there is not much chance of winning. I always thought that was Narduzzi's strongpoint...."coaching them up". Now not so much.
Eh, expectations change with results. Past Pitt teams would've started the year 4-3, this team was 7-0. It wasn't unreasonable with the schedule they had left to finish 9-3. Instead they had a bad home loss to Virginia and were completely outclassed by SMU and Louisville. Didn't look like they even belonged on the same field as those teams.Can you all stop complaining?
We knew this schedule was front loaded with bad teams and we were not going to be strong this year.
Did Cincinnati really have a talent advantage?
This.......I wouldn't call 7-5 a failure