Actually I was the person who posted the thread here about the Duke - BC game, because I was actually watching it. So no, I didn't miss it. And PS, I am not predicting zero wins and I never have predicted zero wins. The person who predicted zero wins was you, not me. If you go back the the thread about people's predictions from right as the season was starting you will see what I predicted. But here's a little clue. There's still a really good chance that I'll get the non-conference record correct.
In any event, the reason why I didn't and would basically never predict zero conference wins is that a team in a major conference winning zero conference games almost never happens. Because even really bad teams, like say Boston College, will play out of their minds once or twice a season, even when they are playing a far superior team, like say Duke, and pull off a big upset. After all, if you only have a 10% chance to win a game that would mean you were a huge underdog. But if you played ten games like that in a season there is a really good chance you'll win one of those ten games that you were a huge underdog in. You know, kind of by definition.
Kind of odd though, that the person who actually thought that we were going to be the better team was me and not you, isn't it? Well, either that or you predicting zero wins was just so when they actually did win a couple of games you could say, see, they aren't as bad as I thought!