Take the Cleveland Browns with the points. All their key players are back and they are a hungry group. Playing away in an empty stadium is also a plus.
The line went from -10 to -8.Take the Cleveland Browns with the points. All their key players are back and they are a hungry group. Playing away in an empty stadium is also a plus.
I jumped on the Over when it first came out.I played the Chiefs -5 1st half and took a shot at the over 3.5 sacks at +110. The over sacks play may look a little square but the price was so good I felt I had to play it. Saw 3.5 -130 at a few places offshore.
I jumped on the Over when it first came out.
I ripped under 56. Someone needs to keep the lights on At FD.
The only way KC is going to be stopped is if they stop themselves through self inflicted mistakes. The Browns DC isn’t very good.Cleveland's defense is garbage so far. If they don't answer with a touchdown here, this thing is over. The Steelers almost had to go out of their way to dig that kind of hole last week, as it appears the Browns may still have a way to go.
The Browns DC said his game plan was to give the Steelers the underneath patterns and make us work our way down the field. LOLThis is embarrassing. They are playing completely reactionary defense right now and getting absolutely picked apart. Feels like Pitt vs Clemson. Frustrating as hell.
The Browns DC said his game plan was to give the Steelers the underneath patterns and make us work our way down the field. LOL
Welp, victims of the stupidest rule in football. That said, these guys are morons for stretching out for the marker like that, when first and goal at the 2 is the worst that could happen.
Even though it went against Cleveland, I hate that touchback rule. Would prefer the offense to get the ball at the 20-yard line.
Good question but thats the way it was explained ...Why would helmet to helmet not be reviewable?
Helmet to helmet caused the fumble ... But not reviewable ..
Because that makes too much sense!Why would helmet to helmet not be reviewable?
What penalty is reviewable?Why would helmet to helmet not be reviewable?
What penalty is reviewable?
The reactionary nature of theNFL rule book is absolutely ridiculous.
I actually like that it’s not reviewable. No other penalty is. More importantly if you have to review it in slow motion then most of the time it’s not obvious and shouldn’t be a penaltyWhy would helmet to helmet not be reviewable?
If something bad happens to Tom Brady, Drew Brees, or Patrick Mahomes today, you can bet there will be a rule against it next year.
I actually like that it’s not reviewable. No other penalty is. More importantly if you have to review it in slow motion then most of the time it’s not obvious and shouldn’t be a penalty
I agree . But when it happened it was totally obvious he lead with his helmet .. No need for replay .. They just plain blew the call and the ref was in perfect position . IMO ..I actually like that it’s not reviewable. No other penalty is. More importantly if you have to review it in slow motion then most of the time it’s not obvious and shouldn’t be a penalty
In fairness to that ref, he has to be watching the ball, to see if it crosses the goal line, as well as the receiver, to make sure he is in bounds. Hard to watch the hit, too.I agree . But when it happened it was totally obvious he lead with his helmet .. No need for replay .. They just plain blew the call and the ref was in perfect position . IMO ..