Ok, let's say Syracuse wins and gets ranked. That gives Duzz 6 ranked opponents in 25 games over the past two seasons and 10 total wins.
Go back another year and you have 8 ranked opponents in 38 games. Go back a 4th year to the magical season and you get 11 ranked opponents in 51 games. That's a far cry from the 48% that Majors II faced.
As far as cannibalizing each other, it could be argued that's a sign of increased parity thanks to the transfer changes. Which means there should be less of a gap between ranked teams and the unranked. So it should be even easier for a middle-class team like Pitt to compete.
Well they're #21 and 17-point favorites against a team that lost pretty much everything, so that seems like a safe assumption.
But no argument from me that Narduzzi has benefitted from weak schedules. He'd probably have been gone a few years ago if Pitt drew the unlucky "Atlantic" card instead of Syracuse.
With the BIG and SEC, I'm just referring to the fact that there are so many of them concentrated in the same two conferences now that it's going to muddy up their records. Like, I have no doubt that Florida is better than Syracuse, for instance.