Like most things...there is nuance and there can be multiple thoughts at once.
Good coach with a great run here. But pressure mounted because of those exits. Meanwhile, he slipped his last 5 years and sonits the GAP that widened between performance and expectations.
Probably a divorce was eventually needed at that rate. The problem to me was timing and then the replacement.
I really don’t understand all the hate for Jamie. I’ve criticized his in game coaching a lot over the years. But he was an awesome coach and a great guy. He’s not perfect but he was a great coach who is nationally known. His first 8 years his teams were usually dominant and full of great players. Now since 2009 he did underperform in the tournament. I think he needs a great game manager as his top assistant. It’s no secret he lost that when Tom Herrion left in 2010 and he never seemed to come close to replacing him. The results in the tournament after Herrion left reflect this
He was always like that. The loss to Pacific for instance. Even the Marquette loss.He only started coaching that way when he stopped recruiting kids who knew how to play the Pitt way. He was not that uptight when he had Carl Krauser or Levance Fields running the show
Let’s see : TCU with JD
Year one at TCU = NIT championship
Year two at TCU = NCAA appearance
Pitt without JD
Year one w/o JD = 4 conference wins
Year two w/o JD =0 conference wins
JD was struggling to recruit the players he needed at Pitt and unless something changed I didn’t see this issue going away . Pitt made a bold move and it backfired big time because of who they hired .Let's edit this post.
Let’s see : TCU with JD
Year one at TCU = NIT championship
Year two at TCU = NCAA appearance
Pitt with KS
Year one w/o JD = 4 conference wins
Year two w/o JD =0 conference wins
I mostly agree with the rest of your post. I respect Jamie for everything he did here but when they made the move to go in another direction I agreed with it and thought it was best for both sides. It was who we brought in that murdered us. Making the decision to move on from JD wasn't egregious. Hiring stallings was.
My point is I don't like the "Pitt can't win without Dixon" narrative. We can. But under no circumstances could we have won with Kevin stallings.
Pitt didn't make a bold move, they made a shitty and laughable move because of Barnes' connection to his buddy at the search firm.JD was struggling to recruit the players he needed at Pitt and unless something changed I didn’t see this issue going away . Pitt made a bold move and it backfired big time because of who they hired .
I’m not saying Pitt can’t win without JD , but Pitt just isn’t in the elite class of bb powers . Pitt just will never be a Duke or Kentucky , but there’s nothing wrong with being in the next group and that’s where they WHERE .
The bold move wasn’t hiring KS .Pitt didn't make a bold move, they made a shitty and laughable move because of Barnes' connection to his buddy at the search firm.
sorry, you are i a dream world and have not a clue. you must be under 40 and only know a Pitt team that made the tourney most years. You obviously are oblivious to Pitt history in hoops, or the lack thereof.The Dixon Japostles will go to the Ends of the Earth to Defend him with Any and All excuses. Congrats to you for Being in that Club. He is an Annual Choke Artist in the NCAA Tourney. Plain and Simple. You can spin it any way you like..
Funny how Leveance and The Elderly Annoying Neighbor are nowhere to be found After TCU and Virginia Choke out? Hmmmmmm.......
Marquette? So now we're blaming Dixon for that because howland had one foot out the door and he was his top assistant?He was always like that. The loss to Pacific for instance. Even the Marquette loss.
and never lost to worse than a number 8 seed. TCU was a minor favorite last night. no big shocker they lost. I think Syracuse is more talented and they are coached by a HOF coach. I don't recall any real embarrassment losses, getting blown out, in the NCAA. the loss to Whisky was down to a last second shot.Wisconsin made an NCAA run. Wichita State went onto to a run, elite 8/final 4? Dixon may have been worn out here. I think he stayed at Pitt partially due to loyalty to the school which really stood by him when he tragically lost his sister. the guy can coach a team, he can keep a team together, he develops players and teams. He is a fighter and a damn good guy. When he had NBA type talent, Blair/Young, they missed the final 4 by a heartbeat. Hey, other coaches can win big at Pitt, they just have to be really good coaches and stay at Pitt when other schools go after him, like Dixon did. yes, he used other schools to get a raise, but he STAYED, he could have left many times.
I mean yea but cuses zone does that to everyoneFor whatever reason? There is a big reason. The guy is a micro manager who slows down possessions and doesn't understand that a powerful offense is what gets it done in the dance. Bennett and Dixon are very similar.
You are way to focused on posts of about 3 people.
It worked out.
I don’t know what that means.4.5 points is not a small favorite. TCU was -200 to win that game outright.
I don’t know what that means.
I wouldn't Dixon messed this program up. His exit is not the problem.I'd take him back in a heartbeat because at least he gets to the tourney but he may be the worst coach in NCAAT history. In fact, I thought I saw something out there saying he was the worst by some stat or metric.
Now, he is off to 2 or 3 interviews before getting a raise/extension
I'd take him back in a heartbeat because at least he gets to the tourney but he may be the worst coach in NCAAT history. In fact, I thought I saw something out there saying he was the worst by some stat or metric.
Now, he is off to 2 or 3 interviews before getting a raise/extension
And guess what Jay Wright has only done it one time himself in the last ten years. Now of course that one year he won it all. But it shows you how hard it is to make deep runs in the tournament.
Wha's that choking sound from Dallas Fort Worth.. oh it's March, it must be Dixon.Yep, what a bum, took a team that hadn't been to the tourney in 20 years, to the tourney. And let's not forget he was without arguably his best player
You're wrong. He went to the Final Four in 2009
You're wrong. He went to the Final Four in 2009
4.5 points is not a small favorite. TCU was -200 to win that game outright.