It knocks Wake out of the tournament but we lose a Q1 opportunity? A Q3 win vs ND or GT doesnt help but it gives us a much easier easier path to the semifinals.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I want to beat wake on a neutral court. Lower seeds do nothing to our bubble conversation
Yes. Poor matchup for us as we’ve seen 3/4 halves of basketball this season.
I'm rooting for the Gerogia Tech-Florida State-Louisville path, but it feels like Q1 wins opportunities might be the next best thing.
I can’t believe that this team would have 22 wins, 4th in the ACC, and be one game from the ACC tournament FINAL in that scenario - and not be in.
I think it’s a really close call.
On one hand, we probably need a win against a good team.
But a 4th bad loss in 5 games would absolutely bury Wake.
If other bubble teams (enough of them) lose early, maybe just playing on Friday night helps us…who knows
But Wake isn’t that good either. Pitt has only 2 wins all year over teams which almost 100% would be in the field - Duke and UVA.I don't think it's close at all, to be honest. The same reaction we would have to Iowa beating Penn State or Texas A&M beating Arkansas would be about how the committee perceived us beating GT or ND.
But Wake isn’t that good either. Pitt has only 2 wins all year over teams which almost 100% would be in the field - Duke and UVA.
Maybe Pitt needs the easiest path to just getting to the UNC game? And then winning that.
I don't think it's close at all, to be honest. The same reaction we would have to Iowa beating Penn State or Texas A&M beating Arkansas would be about how the committee perceived us beating GT or ND.
Wake is a 50/50 game. Lets assume we are in with a win and out with a loss. Wouldn't it be better to have an 80/20 game to win. Wake would be done and losing to UNC doesn't hurt
I don't think it's a 50/50 game; they have outscored us by double digits in three halves this season.
That said, us assuming that doesn't make it a correct assumption. 2-6 in Q1 isn't doing us any favors when our bubble contemporaries have at least 5 Q1 wins in some cases. That's clearly the weak spot in our resume. Assuming a loss to UNC, you think 2-7 is good enough? They said on a broadcast today those games are important because they're how you would fare against tournament-quality teams (obviously it's an estimate on some level).
2-7 screams, "They had plenty of opportunities and did not capitalize on them."
Oh I don’t. I think Pitt is a small favorite.I hear what you're saying. I do think Wake would be a 3-4 point favorite.
Oh I don’t. I think Pitt is a small favorite.
As hard as it is for me to say this ( ), SMF is probably going to be right. If we play Wake we will be a small underdog. I'd guess 2 -3 to open.
But Wake isn’t that good either. Pitt has only 2 wins all year over teams which almost 100% would be in the field - Duke and UVA.
Maybe Pitt needs the easiest path to just getting to the UNC game? And then winning that.