Don't Worry About the Tourney, the ACC Has Our Back
- Thread starter WillyDavis33
- Start date
The UNC AD is the vice chair if that means anything. You'd think he would "fight for 5" ACC teams.
hoopshd.com
NCAA Tournament Selection Committee
The 2024-2025 Selection Committee (the year the term is up is in parenthesis): BUBBA CUNNINGHAM (2025) – North Carolina Athletic Director (Chairperson) MARK COYLE (2026) – Minnesot…
hoopshd.com
You would think he would fight for 6 teams and settle for 5The UNC AD is the vice chair if that means anything. You'd think he would "fight for 5" ACC teams.
NCAA Tournament Selection Committee
The 2024-2025 Selection Committee (the year the term is up is in parenthesis): BUBBA CUNNINGHAM (2025) – North Carolina Athletic Director (Chairperson) MARK COYLE (2026) – Minnesot…
You would think!The UNC AD is the vice chair if that means anything. You'd think he would "fight for 5" ACC teams.
NCAA Tournament Selection Committee
The 2024-2025 Selection Committee (the year the term is up is in parenthesis): BUBBA CUNNINGHAM (2025) – North Carolina Athletic Director (Chairperson) MARK COYLE (2026) – Minnesot…
Scott Barnes owes us one - BIG TIME after what he did to this program.
Hopefully Barnes doesn’t read this message board. He may exclude Pitt just to spite us. 😉
The ACC is the 4th best conference per NET. The MWC is 7th. You would think Cunningham would be like "lets be real here guys, the ACC is pretty good, we arent sending more MWC teams than ACC teams"
As long as all six schools have a Bojangles on campus.
It’s going to be TCU vs Pitt in Dayton to screw both Pitt and Dixon
And more than a few members here would be rooting for TCU. I guarantee it.
As long as we are wearing our white unis, I like our chances against Dixon.
It all seems simple to me. Beat Wake Forest and Pitt is in. Lose to Wake Forest and Pitt is out.
It means that when the committee is discussing Pitt, he will have to leave the room. Just like he will when they talk about the other ACC teams.
Pretty sure that's only when they are discussing UNC. There have been commissioners on the committee and they have to leave the room when anyone from their conference is discussed.
“The ACC has our back”. those are the five scariest words in the english language.
Not sure that’s a screw job. It’s probably where both belong. That said, guys like Lunardi have TCU with a bye and Pitt in the next 4 out. There are 9 teams between them on his S curve. And I hate to bring him up but he’s no alone.
TCU 20-11
Pitt 21-10
TCU 7-11 Q1/Q2
Pitt 7-8
TCU 13-0 Q3/Q4
Pitt 14-2 Q4/Q4
TCU 4 road wins (Gtown, WVU, OSU and Hawaii)
Pitt 7 road wins.
TCU 40 NET
Pitt 43 NET
OOC SOS?? I don’t have the numbers and “allegedly TCUs are better…but come on…
My point? There shouldn’t be this kind of gap between TCU and Pitt on anyone’s S Curve.
TCU's OOC is 320. If they lose to Oklahoma, they may not get in if other bubble teams do well and we have some bid stealers
They also beat Houston so I guess that's why they are 9 ahead of Pitt. But I'd have them right at the cut line. If they lose to OU, they'd be 7-12 in Q1/2. At some point, you cant just get credit for showing up.
