Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Heather has some very tough decisions to make in regards to the stadium situation.
She can not be impressed by the lack of attendance at the home games so far.
We are basically looking at a half empty stadium.
If we lose to GT., the attendance for Rice will be low to mid 30's with good weather.
She either has to accept the fact that HF is too big for Pitt and look to start tarping
areas of the stadium or let the year play out and make decisions for next year.
If we wait for next year do we:
1. Do not sell any upper deck tickets. (Or limit the sections)
2. Tarp the endzones
3. Do nothing and live with it.
4. Start the process of a different location for the team.
I'm sure that Gallagher has a distasteful view of the game day attendance also.
To the best of anyone's knowledge has the subject been discussed between the two?
Just might be time to have a very heart to heart discussion with UPMC.
For the rest of this year just allow people to change their seat assignments , any open seat is fair game , first come first serve .
There is no way the entire lower bowl is sold out.The lower bowl is sold out. Student tickets are sold out. You can't move the upper deck people down because the seats in the lowers are sold. The people just don't show up.
The tickets are too cheap so it's not a big deal. Supply greatly outweighs demand so prices stay depressed.
They might as well double or triple donation amounts and put them on every ticket in the stadium. You'll still get the same 30k fans and make more money.
Tarping won't solve anything because Heinz is a hell hole for Pitt football.
One thing has been proven, power conference teams with big rankings don't draw squat from the local casual fans. Pitt might as well schedule lower rung G5 and build up its win total. The same Pitt fans that were there for YSU were pretty much there for OSU. Pitt is better off trying to create some sort of buzz with inflated win totals than relying on high caliber opponents to sell tickets.
There is no way the entire lower bowl is sold out.
There is no way the entire lower bowl is sold out.
Reduce the size of Heinz to 50k, charge more for seats, give people with the most priority points first choice on their seats and then work your way down to season ticket holders with no donations. The PS game is the big carrot for next year. Less supply and more demand should drive up the prices. The only way to get a ticket to that game is via season tickets.It's always sold out, people just don't go. Season tickets cost nothing.
Joe has a good point. Not sure how you'd pull this off without pissing off an already edgy fan base. The reseating at the Pete when it was close to selling out was not popular. Can you imagine asking someone to give up their seats in Heinz right now?The problem with that is that there are hundreds of people with tickets in the upper level that are better than all but a few seats (talking about non-club, non-box seats) in the lower level. So when you move someone like me to better seats in the lower level, then you have to move out people in the lower level to accommodate people like that. And then those people will (I assume) push out other people in seats that aren't quite as good as theirs. And so on. You'd end up pissing off a whole lot of people if you do that.
Lol, Lykens??
Kudos to whoever gets me you're a bo$$
LOL. Honestly, I thought that is what the OP had in mind when they wrote that.
If I were to guess there are maybe 2-3k people total that attend most home games in the Endzone Upper Deck and Visitors Side Upper Deck. It is not like we are moving 10-15k people.Joe has a good point. Not sure how you'd pull this off without pissing off an already edgy fan base. The reseating at the Pete when it was close to selling out was not popular. Can you imagine asking someone to give up their seats in Heinz right now?
That's fine, but again, the fan base right now is edgy. I'm not saying tarping the seats is a bad idea, but I'm not sure how you pull it off without pissing off those loyal season ticket holders.If I were to guess there are maybe 2-3k people total that attend most home games in the Endzone Upper Deck and Visitors Side Upper Deck. It is not like we are moving 10-15k people.
Everything pisses someone off . I guess your choice is for your team to play in a stadium that looks and feels empty or a stadium that looks like there's actually fans at .And you don't think that would piss people off?
Believe it or not the few thousand who have tickets in the North End Zone like sitting there.That's fine, but again, the fan base right now is edgy. I'm not saying tarping the seats is a bad idea, but I'm not sure how you pull it off without pissing off those loyal season ticket holders.
And @Joe the Panther Fan is right - who/how do you displace others in the lower bowl?
The lower bowl is sold out. Student tickets are sold out. You can't move the upper deck people down because the seats in the lowers are sold. The people just don't show up.
The tickets are too cheap so it's not a big deal. Supply greatly outweighs demand so prices stay depressed.
They might as well double or triple donation amounts and put them on every ticket in the stadium. You'll still get the same 30k fans and make more money.
Tarping won't solve anything because Heinz is a hell hole for Pitt football.
Believe it or not the few thousand who have tickets in the North End Zone like sitting there.That's fine, but again, the fan base right now is edgy. I'm not saying tarping the seats is a bad idea, but I'm not sure how you pull it off without pissing off those loyal season ticket holders.
And @Joe the Panther Fan is right - who/how do you displace others in the lower bowl?
They're similar to the people who move away from populated areas to get away from people. If you "jammed" them in other sections they probably wouldnt attend the game. Lots of them have kids who like the space in the North End Zone!
Years ago we alternated our seats to sit with some friends in the North End Zone since we had more than one set of tickets.
200 show but there are alot more who have season tickets who show up on and off. Thats why they buy those cheap North End Zone tickets because they go to some games not all of them!There are probably 200 people that sit there. Who cares if we tarp that section? 150 of them will buy tickets somewhere else and maybe 50 get upset upset and dont renew. Not a big deal.
The lower bowl is sold out. Student tickets are sold out. You can't move the upper deck people down because the seats in the lowers are sold. The people just don't show up.
The tickets are too cheap so it's not a big deal. Supply greatly outweighs demand so prices stay depressed.
They might as well double or triple donation amounts and put them on every ticket in the stadium. You'll still get the same 30k fans and make more money.
Tarping won't solve anything because Heinz is a hell hole for Pitt football.
What the hell are they going to have a heart to heart with UPMC about? Sponsoring tarps?
Rice might not even get to 30K.
One thing has been proven, power conference teams with big rankings don't draw squat from the local casual fans. Pitt might as well schedule lower rung G5 and build up its win total. The same Pitt fans that were there for YSU were pretty much there for OSU. Pitt is better off trying to create some sort of buzz with inflated win totals than relying on high caliber opponents to sell tickets.
Yeah, I don't think you are getting this.Pitt does not have 18k fans out there to buy the extra tickets. If they did, then they would not have to go this route. It defeats the purpose. The Pitt fans on the fence will buy season tickets, and be more likely to use them. If you go your route, then we will be in the same exact scenario as last year. About 20k Nitters in the crowd for the Pitt-PS game and then 35-40k in attendance for the rest of the Pitt games.
I have been saying this for years. Stacking wins is far, far more important than getting above average P5 opponents on home and homes and probably losing. Hell, what would beating Oklahoma State have even done for us either year? The kids we are recruiting don't even have OKSt on their radar. We aren't even remotely close to playoff consideration, so strength of schedule means nothing. It *maybe* draws another 6-8k fans than Akron. Of course, getting absolutely embarrassed costs you at least another few thousands fans the rest of the season. It is incredibly stupid.What the hell are they going to have a heart to heart with UPMC about? Sponsoring tarps?
Rice might not even get to 30K.
One thing has been proven, power conference teams with big rankings don't draw squat from the local casual fans. Pitt might as well schedule lower rung G5 and build up its win total. The same Pitt fans that were there for YSU were pretty much there for OSU. Pitt is better off trying to create some sort of buzz with inflated win totals than relying on high caliber opponents to sell tickets.
Just close upper decks except maybe the 50 yard line sections and open the rest up when there's actually demand for tickets . Some genius at Pitt can figure it out .Believe it or not the few thousand who have tickets in the North End Zone like sitting there.
They're similar to the people who move away from populated areas to get away from people. If you "jammed" them in other sections they probably wouldnt attend the game. Lots of them have kids who like the space in the North End Zone!
Years ago we alternated our seats to sit with some friends in the North End Zone since we had more than one set of tickets.
Pitt needs to cultivate its student base into their fans for the future . They've failed to do this , this isn't the fans fault this is Pitts fault . Stop blaming the customer because your business sucks , fix it or get out of that business if your not satisfied with the returns your getting .Attendance wise, fans really do need to take some blame. Simply, they don't show up. We see it on here, tons of excuses about why you can't make a game.
Remember last year after beating #2 Clemson, then getting 35k for the final two hole games after that?
Remember two years ago when pitt was 6-1 and 4-0 going into a huge ACC division game against UNC on a Thursday night, and we drew 43k?
2009, pitt was ranked 14th, was 7-1 and undefeated in conference and played Syracuse at home. 46k.
We have a crappy fanbase that generally can't be bothered to show up. Even if pitt was going undefeated, outside of nd, wvu, PSU and de facto championship games like the cincy game, pitt will average 40-45k at most.
It's always sold out, people just don't go. Season tickets cost nothing.
Pitt needs to cultivate its student base into their fans for the future . They've failed to do this , this isn't the fans fault this is Pitts fault . Stop blaming the customer because your business sucks , fix it or get out of that business if your not satisfied with the returns your getting .
Pitt athletics deserves the support they're getting , the fans of Pitt athletics are the ones getting a bad deal .
Pitt needs to cultivate its student base into their fans for the future . They've failed to do this , this isn't the fans fault this is Pitts fault . Stop blaming the customer because your business sucks , fix it or get out of that business if your not satisfied with the returns your getting .
Pitt athletics deserves the support they're getting , the fans of Pitt athletics are the ones getting a bad deal .
My point is that even when they don't suck, fans still don't show up.
Pitt doesn't have an extra 30K fans who are going to say, "Woah, we beat Clemson, let me buy tickets for the Duke and Syracuse games so I can watch the team at Heinz in 40 degree weather instead of my 55 inch HDTV."
Pitt has 30K diehards. Thats about it. If we become Alabama, we'll grow that fanbase. 8-4, 9-3, 7-5 doesn't move the needle a hundredth of an inch. Yinzers arent going to give up time and money to attend a Pitt game they can watch on TV. Become Alabama or Ohio State and maybe we can get 50K-60K to every home game and since thats not going to happen we need to figure a way for 30K-45K to look and feel better.
Pitt needs to cultivate its student base into their fans for the future . They've failed to do this , this isn't the fans fault this is Pitts fault . Stop blaming the customer because your business sucks , fix it or get out of that business if your not satisfied with the returns your getting .
Pitt athletics deserves the support they're getting , the fans of Pitt athletics are the ones getting a bad deal .
Pitt doesn't have an extra 30K fans who are going to say, "Woah, we beat Clemson, let me buy tickets for the Duke and Syracuse games so I can watch the team at Heinz in 40 degree weather instead of my 55 inch HDTV."
Pitt has 30K diehards. Thats about it. If we become Alabama, we'll grow that fanbase. 8-4, 9-3, 7-5 doesn't move the needle a hundredth of an inch. Yinzers arent going to give up time and money to attend a Pitt game they can watch on TV. Become Alabama or Ohio State and maybe we can get 50K-60K to every home game and since thats not going to happen we need to figure a way for 30K-45K to look and feel better.
Pitt doesn't have an extra 30K fans who are going to say, "Woah, we beat Clemson, let me buy tickets for the Duke and Syracuse games so I can watch the team at Heinz in 40 degree weather instead of my 55 inch HDTV."
Pitt has 30K diehards. Thats about it. If we become Alabama, we'll grow that fanbase. 8-4, 9-3, 7-5 doesn't move the needle a hundredth of an inch. Yinzers arent going to give up time and money to attend a Pitt game they can watch on TV. Become Alabama or Ohio State and maybe we can get 50K-60K to every home game and since thats not going to happen we need to figure a way for 30K-45K to look and feel better.
Well, as a ticket holder who sits on the 30 on the home side upper level, I can tell you I would be extremely unhappy if I was relocated to the lower level in a corner.
1) Pitt had a good team coming back, led by a superstar (Fitzgerald).You also have to factor in some people go to a HS football game on Friday and then the Stillers game on Sunday. They need to have one day not consumed by footbaw. Also, if the Steelers sucked, maybe Pitt would get better attendance. In 2003 when Pitt had great attendance, the Steelers finished 6-10.
They need to turn students into dieheart fans who become the future STH and obviously they've failed miserably over the yrs in doing so . Pitt has a large enough alumni base to easily fill up HF if Fb was really important to the university .My point is that even when they don't suck, fans still don't show up.