We should just turn this thread into the official long running "Locker Room" board.
You know what? That’s a fair response. I didn’t give any warning; even though i had been thinking about it for awhile, I didn’t communicate that to the board. Even when we ban someone from posting, we usually give a warning - I didn’t do that in this instance.I’m not shocked; I knew there would be some blowback, since there are some posters who spent a lot of time there. And yes, there’s been political talk there for a long time, but it seems like the last year or so has taken a turn and become something different from civil discussion. This wasn’t a sudden decision; it was one I had been mulling for quite some time. Ultimately it came down to the amount of heavy-handed moderation that board - in its most recent incarnation - merited. Oftentimes when I went onto the board, there were things that needed to be deleted but they were so buried in the threads that I would end up killing whole threads.
Short of bringing in mods who were exclusively dedicated to watching that board, it seemed like the best solution, given the circumstances, was to eliminate the board itself. As always, I appreciate and invite comments and suggestions regarding board moderation.
Being a mod can’t be that tough Chris. Suggesting you need a mod for one board is complete nonsense and you know it. What should have been done was a warning that if the board didn’t turn more civil, it would be deleted. You gave the posters 0 warning and just deleted it. Of all the options you had, you picked the nuclear one.
I’m not shocked; I knew there would be some blowback, since there are some posters who spent a lot of time there. And yes, there’s been political talk there for a long time, but it seems like the last year or so has taken a turn and become something different from civil discussion. This wasn’t a sudden decision; it was one I had been mulling for quite some time. Ultimately it came down to the amount of heavy-handed moderation that board - in its most recent incarnation - merited. Oftentimes when I went onto the board, there were things that needed to be deleted but they were so buried in the threads that I would end up killing whole threads.It was not the most active board, not by a long shot. And I’m not being arrogant; I was just curious what people thought the underlying motivation was.
Well, that’s what we’re trying to gauge from you. Your response is “you don’t want political talk” but there’s been political talk for at least 9 years and all of a sudden it’s not acceptable.
Essentially your answers have been “well it’s my board so this is what I’m going to do.” Which is your prerogative but don’t act shocked when people question that approach.
Short of bringing in mods who were exclusively dedicated to watching that board, it seemed like the best solution, given the circumstances, was to eliminate the board itself. As always, I appreciate and invite comments and suggestions regarding board moderation.
We don't get that in any of the forums! LOL!
Agree, @JGregor. We’ve all taken our lumps in there. And lately you have more than anyone given your clinging to the fictitious collusion like a Jedi clings to the force. For you to say what you just said is a strong case to be made in support of the LR. Kudos.Quite a few times awhile ago I kept trying to log into the Locker Room and thought there was something wrong. I hadn't been there in perhaps over a week having been in Pittsburgh with family. Not sure what happened.
Apparently to many complaints. I can tell you that I never complained once to Peak in the nine years I have been a member. I feel that all of us sharpened our views and thinking with those who offered a different view.
Perhaps a new Forum will open?
How fascist of you! Given you’re the only one with that opinion who frequented the board, I’d say you’re in a very small minority. There were plenty of board lefties in there daily who spewed plenty of left wing stuff. And they seem to all be disappointed today.Not sure what was so hard to understand for some of you. The board was a cesspool with a lot of racialist overtones. As I said, there are plenty of other alt-right message boards out there. Having such a message board semi-affiliated with Pitt athletics is wrong. I am not sure any other Rivals site has a message board where over 90% of the threads relate to politics.
Adios, amigo! Vaya con Dios!Yeah the locker room was more risque than stalking high school kids because they can dribble well or run really fast in shorts. Learning about recruits here and then creeping on their twitters is really cool.
The locker room was mostly fine. Sure there were occasional times someone stepped over the line. But that happens everywhere on every board. We are all big boys and knew what we were going there for. Nether lefties or righties were exempt. And if you didn’t like it, no one forced you inside.
I will miss my pals who I disagreed with daily. @JGregor , @pittman71 , @pittguy81, @SoufOaklin4Life , @HOF Coach , @TempleBAPittMPA , just to name a few ...see you all around,
And I won’t be around panthelair as much. Fast 40 times from 16 year olds don’t excite me.
Not sure what was so hard to understand for some of you. The board was a cesspool with a lot of racialist overtones. As I said, there are plenty of other alt-right message boards out there. Having such a message board semi-affiliated with Pitt athletics is wrong. I am not sure any other Rivals site has a message board where over 90% of the threads relate to politics.
This is a bingo.Just curious what do you consider to be "alt-right". Seems to me your definition is anyone who disagrees with your point of view. And while there were a few people with clearly racist comments that was the exception rather than the rule. Heck you have that on this board with people who rip Tomlin.
I knew it! Heel!It was mostly harmless fun and a place to talk politics without pissing off your family and friends. There you could piss off strangers. I assumed a counterpoint role so that there wasn't 7 guys agreeing with each other in every thread. It was fun being the WWE villain guy.
Geez Tommy, still trying to win the internet ;-)I see this as the Lair version of the mercy rule.
Chris could only take the pinatas getting a beating for so long by the *righties*.
This way everyone gets a participation trophy.
This is a bingo.Being a mod can’t be that tough Chris. Suggesting you need a mod for one board is complete nonsense and you know it. What should have been done was a warning that if the board didn’t turn more civil, it would be deleted. You gave the posters 0 warning and just deleted it. Of all the options you had, you picked the nuclear one.
Give it backYou know what? That’s a fair response. I didn’t give any warning; even though i had been thinking about it for awhile, I didn’t communicate that to the board. Even when we ban someone from posting, we usually give a warning - I didn’t do that in this instance.
I do appreciate the constructive feedback that’s been offered in this thread. I’ll take it under consideration.
For a variety of reasons, we made the decision to eliminate the Locker Room board earlier today. That board served as a destination for truly off-topic posts, but its removal should not be misconstrued as an opening for the threads that populated that board to be posted here.
Ultimately, this site is dedicated to coverage of and discussion about Pitt sports. There are times when the discussions will veer away from that general topic and we understand that Pitt fans have interests in other topics - like other Pittsburgh sports - so we will attempt to be reasonable in what is permitted and what is not.
But at this point in time, we are not going to have political posts on these boards. Those threads will be deleted.
As always, our moderation policies will be flexible, and we welcome suggestions/comments regarding those policies. Thanks for your consideration on this matter, and thanks for making these boards the best place to discuss Pitt sports.
Adios, amigo! Vaya con Dios!Yeah the locker room was more risque than stalking high school kids because they can dribble well or run really fast in shorts. Learning about recruits here and then creeping on their twitters is really cool.
The locker room was mostly fine. Sure there were occasional times someone stepped over the line. But that happens everywhere on every board. We are all big boys and knew what we were going there for. Nether lefties or righties were exempt. And if you didn’t like it, no one forced you inside.
I will miss my pals who I disagreed with daily. @JGregor , @pittman71 , @pittguy81, @SoufOaklin4Life , @HOF Coach , @TempleBAPittMPA , just to name a few ...see you all around,
And I won’t be around panthelair as much. Fast 40 times from 16 year olds don’t excite me.
Geez Tommy, still trying to win the internet ;-)
Yep.Yeah but I don't hold it against him.........or you.......
That helmet sucks!! Wait, am I allowed to say that here, or did I just turn this board into a cesspool?Yep.
After all we all have one thing in common .
H2P
Yep.Yeah but I don't hold it against him.........or you.......
After all we all have one thing in common .
H2P
I have both.Actually, I asked a question over there would you rather have a Pitt fan neighbor who was a Democrat or a Penn State fan neighbor who was a Republican. Everyone who answered went with the PSU Republican. The folks over there are Republican fanboys more than anything. There are some, like NCPitt, who I don't remember ever seeing him post on a Pitt sports board.
I have both.Actually, I asked a question over there would you rather have a Pitt fan neighbor who was a Democrat or a Penn State fan neighbor who was a Republican. Everyone who answered went with the PSU Republican. The folks over there are Republican fanboys more than anything. There are some, like NCPitt, who I don't remember ever seeing him post on a Pitt sports board.
Two Lehigh Profs on one side and a house full of Nitter Conservative Republicans on the other.
I'll take the Nitters!
"it's five o'clock somewhere"
Signed: Mr Buffett
Go PITT & CSU Rams!
How fascist of you! Given you’re the only one with that opinion who frequented the board, I’d say you’re in a very small minority. There were plenty of board lefties in there daily who spewed plenty of left wing stuff. And they seem to all be disappointed today.Not sure what was so hard to understand for some of you. The board was a cesspool with a lot of racialist overtones. As I said, there are plenty of other alt-right message boards out there. Having such a message board semi-affiliated with Pitt athletics is wrong. I am not sure any other Rivals site has a message board where over 90% of the threads relate to politics.
And remember, if everything is racist, then nothing is racist. Think about that for a few moments.
I do have a R. psu fan .Actually, I asked a question over there would you rather have a Pitt fan neighbor who was a Democrat or a Penn State fan neighbor who was a Republican. Everyone who answered went with the PSU Republican. The folks over there are Republican fanboys more than anything. There are some, like NCPitt, who I don't remember ever seeing him post on a Pitt sports board.
How fascist of you! Given you’re the only one with that opinion who frequented the board, I’d say you’re in a very small minority. There were plenty of board lefties in there daily who spewed plenty of left wing stuff. And they seem to all be disappointed today.Not sure what was so hard to understand for some of you. The board was a cesspool with a lot of racialist overtones. As I said, there are plenty of other alt-right message boards out there. Having such a message board semi-affiliated with Pitt athletics is wrong. I am not sure any other Rivals site has a message board where over 90% of the threads relate to politics.
And remember, if everything is racist, then nothing is racist. Think about that for a few moments.
There were maybe 7-8 "lefties" and they were outnumbered probably 5-1 or 10-1 which is a disproportionate ratio to Pitt fans in general. A few months ago, I counted the threads started by each group and like 14 of the top 15 were righty threads. I remember being surprised when someone put up a "who are you voting for" post and it was like Trump 51, Clinton 49. I expected it to be like 80/20 given the traffic but I theorize that righties are more "loyal" and "committed" to their cause. Its morning radio, Hannity on the way home, Fox News at night and Internet boards in between. Its a lifestyle. Dems, probably to a fault, have other things to occupy their time. Sometimes they show up and vote, sometimes not. But they arent as devoted
No way. I despise all of you white guilt, I am sorry for having balls, tranvestite enabling, dress my 3 year old son in a dress, American hating libs but even I would prefer a pitt Democrat neighbor over a psu conservative as a neighborActually, I asked a question over there would you rather have a Pitt fan neighbor who was a Democrat or a Penn State fan neighbor who was a Republican. Everyone who answered went with the PSU Republican. The folks over there are Republican fanboys more than anything. There are some, like NCPitt, who I don't remember ever seeing him post on a Pitt sports board.
There were maybe 7-8 "lefties" and they were outnumbered probably 5-1 or 10-1 which is a disproportionate ratio to Pitt fans in general. A few months ago, I counted the threads started by each group and like 14 of the top 15 were righty threads. I remember being surprised when someone put up a "who are you voting for" post and it was like Trump 51, Clinton 49. I expected it to be like 80/20 given the traffic but I theorize that righties are more "loyal" and "committed" to their cause. Its morning radio, Hannity on the way home, Fox News at night and Internet boards in between. Its a lifestyle. Dems, probably to a fault, have other things to occupy their time. Sometimes they show up and vote, sometimes not. But they arent as devoted
SMF is typical lib. Everyone that disagrees with him is wrong and needs to be silenced. He screams racism at first hint of a differing opinion. He gets offended at the drop of a hat.Just a few nuggets for you:
•The locker room goes in cycles. Not sure what triggers it, but it wasn’t so long ago that the lefties far outnumbered the righties. Before it was taken down, I’d say the regular posters were about 15 cons to about 10 libs. Liberal participation right now is lower than it was in October 2016...for obvious reasons. Many went away. But they would have been back. The locker room is cyclical just like who holds power in DC is cyclical.
•just because there are conservatives over there, it doesn’t make them alt-right, whatever that means. It just makes them right of you. And there’s nothing wrong with that, unless you’re intolerant of those who don’t think like you.
• Based on your numbers, you’re saying there are as many as 80 cons over there. That’s warped.
• there are a few libs over there whose m.o. is to not start threads and just lurk and attempt to tear down conservatives. And there are many cons who enjoy starting threads. Using the rationale as to who starts threads to arrive at opinions is quite unscientific and unconventional. But people are used to that type of thing from you.
and let’s not forget all the others you didn’t list, who do drivebys, hoping no one fact checks their claims, but then go away again when they are proven wrong.Just because the righties were more knowledgable and ballsy enough to start threads has ZERO to do with your fantasy of lefties being outnumbered 5-1 or 10-1.
You're really nipping at that hyperbole bottle today.
Funny how all of a sudden when the sub forum is now shut down and unsearchable you can *recall* all these little tidbits we cant verify
Heres only 7 lefties.
Flair
Gregor
Souf
H2P
PITTMAN71
Temple
81
Now name me 35-70 righties please.
and let’s not forget all the others you didn’t list, who do drivebys, hoping no one fact checks their claims, but then go away again when they are proven wrong.Just because the righties were more knowledgable and ballsy enough to start threads has ZERO to do with your fantasy of lefties being outnumbered 5-1 or 10-1.
You're really nipping at that hyperbole bottle today.
Funny how all of a sudden when the sub forum is now shut down and unsearchable you can *recall* all these little tidbits we cant verify
Heres only 7 lefties.
Flair
Gregor
Souf
H2P
PITTMAN71
Temple
81
Now name me 35-70 righties please.
and let’s not forget all the others you didn’t list, who do drivebys, hoping no one fact checks their claims, but then go away again when they are proven wrong.Just because the righties were more knowledgable and ballsy enough to start threads has ZERO to do with your fantasy of lefties being outnumbered 5-1 or 10-1.
You're really nipping at that hyperbole bottle today.
Funny how all of a sudden when the sub forum is now shut down and unsearchable you can *recall* all these little tidbits we cant verify
Heres only 7 lefties.
Flair
Gregor
Souf
H2P
PITTMAN71
Temple
81
Now name me 35-70 righties please.
Actually, I asked a question over there would you rather have a Pitt fan neighbor who was a Democrat or a Penn State fan neighbor who was a Republican. Everyone who answered went with the PSU Republican. The folks over there are Republican fanboys more than anything. There are some, like NCPitt, who I don't remember ever seeing him post on a Pitt sports board.
Not sure what was so hard to understand for some of you. The board was a cesspool with a lot of racialist overtones. As I said, there are plenty of other alt-right message boards out there. Having such a message board semi-affiliated with Pitt athletics is wrong. I am not sure any other Rivals site has a message board where over 90% of the threads relate to politics.
SMF is typical lib. Everyone that disagrees with him is wrong and needs to be silenced. He screams racism at first hint of a differing opinion. He gets offended at the drop of a hat.
Dude should be a professor at pitt for as open minded as he is.
SMF is typical lib. Everyone that disagrees with him is wrong and needs to be silenced. He screams racism at first hint of a differing opinion. He gets offended at the drop of a hat.
Dude should be a professor at pitt for as open minded as he is.
Just a few nuggets for you:
•The locker room goes in cycles. Not sure what triggers it, but it wasn’t so long ago that the lefties far outnumbered the righties. Before it was taken down, I’d say the regular posters were about 15 cons to about 10 libs. Liberal participation right now is lower than it was in October 2016...for obvious reasons. Many went away. But they would have been back. The locker room is cyclical just like who holds power in DC is cyclical.
•just because there are conservatives over there, it doesn’t make them alt-right, whatever that means. It just makes them right of you. And there’s nothing wrong with that, unless you’re intolerant of those who don’t think like you.
• Based on your numbers, you’re saying there are as many as 80 cons over there. That’s warped.
• there are a few libs over there whose m.o. is to not start threads and just lurk and attempt to tear down conservatives. And there are many cons who enjoy starting threads. Using the rationale as to who starts threads to arrive at opinions is quite unscientific and unconventional. But people are used to that type of thing from you.
If we have it your way you won't be able to argue politics or you will be taken away and never seen again .Find a new hobby or a new place to argue politics .