Agree. McCord next to visit.Yeah, hard pass.
Oh, I know. Will be a complete sh!t show. From the boldly stupid move up to reach for him in the draft to the inevitable circus when Deion ends up on the sidelines. Personally, I'm looking forward to it because it will finally tank the franchise to the point they have to make some drastic and otherwise unthinkable moves.You are also drafting Deion. Do they realize that?
Oh, I know. Will be a complete sh!t show. From the boldly stupid move up to reach for him in the draft to the inevitable circus when Deion ends up on the sidelines. Personally, I'm looking forward to it because it will finally tank the franchise to the point they have to make some drastic and otherwise unthinkable moves.
Are you kidding? The Steelers and Tomlin love that kind of stuff.You are also drafting Deion. Do they realize that?
They are taking a DL.
That's probably what they should have done when they took Pickett because what they really needed really wasn't there.Are you kidding? The Steelers and Tomlin love that kind of stuff.
The Steelers should trade down and acquire extra picks that might enable them to trade up in next years draft when there might be better QB options.
That's probably what they should have done when they took Pickett because what they really needed really wasn't there.
Are you kidding? The Steelers and Tomlin love that kind of stuff.
The Steelers should trade down and acquire extra picks that might enable them to trade up in next years draft when there might be better QB options.
If you have enough draft capital, you don't even have to "tank" to have the flexibility to make a move. Heck, if you do things right, you might even be able to grab a FA QB that isn't older than some of the coaches.It makes so much sense to trade Watt, trade Pickens, and maybe even trade down in this year's draft to pick up a late 2nd or early 3rd to substitute for the 2nd we traded away. Then don't sign Rogers, so that A) Our compensatory formula nets us even more draft picks and B) We can have a worse season and obtain a higher slot in 2026.
I understand this is a bit extreme, perhaps to a point of being slightly childish, but if we do all of these things we can bring in such an influx of young talent that the fortunes of this franchise could turn around instantly. We likely wouldn't even have to trade up to get a QB next season, because we'd be in a good enough spot already. Start getting ready for the new generation, instead of clinging to some faint hope of maybe squeaking out a wildcard win.
Or we can just keep on doing what we're doing.
If you have enough draft capital, you don't even have to "tank" to have the flexibility to make a move. Heck, if you do things right, you might even be able to grab a FA QB that isn't older than some of the coaches.
Yeah for sure. Except it’s 2 years later than we should have with Watt and Minkah.It makes so much sense to trade Watt, trade Pickens, and maybe even trade down in this year's draft to pick up a late 2nd or early 3rd to substitute for the 2nd we traded away. Then don't sign Rogers, so that A) Our compensatory formula nets us even more draft picks and B) We can have a worse season and obtain a higher slot in 2026.
I understand this is a bit extreme, perhaps to a point of being slightly childish, but if we do all of these things we can bring in such an influx of young talent that the fortunes of this franchise could turn around instantly. We likely wouldn't even have to trade up to get a QB next season, because we'd be in a good enough spot already. Start getting ready for the new generation, instead of clinging to some faint hope of maybe squeaking out a wildcard win.
Or we can just keep on doing what we're doing.
Yeah for sure. Except it’s 2 years later than we should have with Watt and Minkah.
(Let’s not forget that trading for Minkah might have already cost us our franchise QB if you’re to believe Herbert is one).
And the George Pickens trade talk on these boards only started, what, 8 months ago? Or has it been longer? Souf would know, as he dug in his high heels against it.
i think steelers fans and media are way off on the trade value that Watt will give you on the open market. Steelers fans believing we'll get multiple first rd picks are out of their minds. even getting one First rd pick is extremely unlikely.It makes so much sense to trade Watt, trade Pickens, and maybe even trade down in this year's draft to pick up a late 2nd or early 3rd to substitute for the 2nd we traded away. Then don't sign Rogers, so that A) Our compensatory formula nets us even more draft picks and B) We can have a worse season and obtain a higher slot in 2026.
I understand this is a bit extreme, perhaps to a point of being slightly childish, but if we do all of these things we can bring in such an influx of young talent that the fortunes of this franchise could turn around instantly. We likely wouldn't even have to trade up to get a QB next season, because we'd be in a good enough spot already. Start getting ready for the new generation, instead of clinging to some faint hope of maybe squeaking out a wildcard win.
Or we can just keep on doing what we're doing.
i think steelers fans and media are way off on the trade value that Watt will give you on the open market. Steelers fans believing we'll get multiple first rd picks are out of their minds. even getting one First rd pick is extremely unlikely.
At best it would be a 2nd round pick and maybe a later rd pick too. a team is only going to get him for one year, they arent giving away future first rd picks for a 31 year old DE who will give you one year..
I think the steelers will let him finish out his contract here, not trade him and take the PR hit that would come from it, maybe negotiate a next contract but with what he will most likely be asking, not come close to signing him. That way he finished out his contract here, rooney doenst get fans blasting him for trading away a legend and he gets over-paid by another team. its a Win -win scenario.
They need to send Watt packing. I don’t remember but I’m pretty sure the Bills gave up capital for an aging Von Miller. Watt can still be a bigger asset for the Steelers off the field than he is on the field. But they won’t do it.Agreed, but it's better late than never (I mean, unless you'd only get a return similar to what you'd get as a compensatory pick anyway).
The better franchises have stayed ahead of the curve by knowing when to part with big-time players who still had some meat on the bone. The Brady Era Patriots wrote the book on it. But the Eagles did it with Wentz and some others; the Chiefs did it with Hill; etc.
Between the Penguins and Steelers, however, Pittsburgh has become the Swan Song City.
They need to send Watt packing. I don’t remember but I’m pretty sure the Bills gave up capital for an aging Von Miller. Watt can still be a bigger asset for the Steelers off the field than he is on the field. But they won’t do it.
The mediocre high priced Tomlin led defense can still be ranked in the bottom 3rd in the league in YPG without Watt.
Edit: miller was traded for a 2nd and 3rd
Trading pickens, i go back and forth on..Yeah, I have no delusions about what Watt would fetch in return. I was thinking a 2nd and a 4th. As FK mentioned, this should have been done two years ago. At one point, he would have yielded two first round picks and maybe something else, also. Those days are long gone.
Pickens never once played with a viable WR opposite of him. Just look ant how bad Johnson was when he left. He was an jabroni. And Carl Jr still didn’t run routes half the time. Imagine how easy it was to play in a secondary against the Steelers the past 3 years.Trading pickens, i go back and forth on..
One one side, i think if you can get a 2nd rd, you do it, use that pick to draft a WR and you basically traded out a head case on his last year of contract for a rookie with 4 years of control under a rookie contract.
the only problem with this is we have a very spotty history of drafting wrs. we seem to find the biggest head cases or busts in the draft and draft them. it's almost frightening how inept we are with drafting wrs..
On flip side, i am tempted to see what pickens can do now that he's back as a #2 wr and not getting double teamed every play since we finally have a wr opposite of him who opposing defenses will actually respect...
Trading pickens, i go back and forth on..
One one side, i think if you can get a 2nd rd, you do it, use that pick to draft a WR and you basically traded out a head case on his last year of contract for a rookie with 4 years of control under a rookie contract.
the only problem with this is we have a very spotty history of drafting wrs. we seem to find the biggest head cases or busts in the draft and draft them. it's almost frightening how inept we are with drafting wrs..
On flip side, i am tempted to see what pickens can do now that he's back as a #2 wr and not getting double teamed every play since we finally have a wr opposite of him who opposing defenses will actually respect...
i dont disagree with this and that's what makes me think keeping pickens for his last year wouldnt be terrible. we obviously cant sign him so this is it for him but still will be fun to watch (I hope)..Pickens never once played with a viable WR opposite of him. Just look ant how bad Johnson was when he left. He was an jabroni. And Carl Jr still didn’t run routes half the time. Imagine how easy it was to play in a secondary against the Steelers the past 3 years.
Ehh…yeah but what would it yield? When the ceiling is a wild card game, I’m not interested.i dont disagree with this and that's what makes me think keeping pickens for his last year wouldnt be terrible. we obviously cant sign him so this is it for him but still will be fun to watch (I hope)..
yield actual winning results? no, most likely not..Ehh…yeah but what would it yield? When the ceiling is a wild card game, I’m not interested.
Pickens is supposed to be a true #1 who doesn't need anyone opposite of him to draw coverage away. But even if he isn't, just quitting on routes and taking plays off won't be helped by having anyone better on the other side. Just means he's going to lose targets and that will just make him worse.Pickens never once played with a viable WR opposite of him. Just look ant how bad Johnson was when he left. He was an jabroni. And Carl Jr still didn’t run routes half the time. Imagine how easy it was to play in a secondary against the Steelers the past 3 years.
What you said about Pickens and losing targets and quitting on routes seems like it’s going to result in more tantrums from Pickens. This type of play will end up hurting having 2 good WR. Of course Tomlin will defend Pickens. The issue with Pickens is everyone knew of behavior before he was drafted and Tomlin has never done anything to help him to play the game the right way. They should trade him now while he has value to get at least a 3rd round pick. Keeping him around doesn’t help this teamPickens is supposed to be a true #1 who doesn't need anyone opposite of him to draw coverage away. But even if he isn't, just quitting on routes and taking plays off won't be helped by having anyone better on the other side. Just means he's going to lose targets and that will just make him worse.
I doubt Pickens brings much value.They should trade him now while he has value to get at least a 3rd round pick.
You folks may as well get mentally preparedyield actual winning results? no, most likely not..
get a few first downs and make me not want to throw my f'in TV Thru my window every sunday like i have for the last 3 years because i was forced to watch the most inept passing offense in the history of the nfl with that abortion of an offense dating back to 2021?
maybe..
I'm not sure a QB that wasn't even invited to the draft would be a no brainer. If what you're saying is true, the no brainer move would be to trade back.If he falls that far it’s an absolutely no brainer to take him .
There is a lot of DT depth and no real stars
Good point-I'm not sure a QB that wasn't even invited to the draft would be a no brainer. If what you're saying is true, the no brainer move would be to trade back.