Had Woodson moved to safety like the Steelers wanted him to he may have continued his domination and played here his whole career. His ego made him play CB for a cpl more years when he lost a little. When he finally went to S he was once again a pro bowler.People have quickly forgotten how good Rod Woodson was. He may have been the best Steeler ever and was absolutely dominant until blowing out his knee.
I think Ben has been great over time, it is hard to argue that. But, the Steelers have had a lot of straight up legends. Guys who were the best or transcendent at their position. Roethlisberger played/plays in a golden age of QBs, but was never quite that even at his most dominant.
Joe Greene, Dermonti Dawson, Mel Blount, Rod Woodson, Troy Polamalu, Mike Webster ... all guys that may have been the best ever at what they did on their best day/season.
Steelers fans may hate AB, but he had the most dominant run a receiver has maybe ever had in his last 4-5 years as a Steeler. Huge talent that also was a better player than Ben relative to his competition though they needed each other.
Then, you have guys like Ham, Lambert, Harrison, Harris, Bettis, Bradshaw, Stallworth, Swann, Lloyd, Greene (people forget that when he played for the Steelers, Lloyd was better than him), etc ... players that were absolute monsters, HoF in reality and/or level at their best. I think Ben falls a little more in with this crew relative to the competition.
The guy has been a stud, but the Steelers have had a lot of studs. The position means a ton more than anything else, but player vs player at respective position they have had probably 10+ guys that were more All-Time than Ben (who has had a marvelous career and will be in the HoF).
Well, who was clearly better? I think the following guys: Montana, Manning, Brady, Unitas, Marino, Brees, Young, Favre and Elway. I would add Rodgers too. Mahomes as well though he is so early on. Any arguments or additions?Where does Ben rank on the list of all-time NFL QB’s?
Terry came to a team that was perennial losers - Ben came to an established team with a great defense. There is a difference. And that Steeler team won four Super Bowls in those eight years...this Steeler team hasn’t won jack in over a decade.Depends on your criteria.
If it’s a player who is directly responsible for the most wins in team history, it’s not particularly close. He is #1.
It’s the better part of two decades of contending football. Ben has played in maybe 2 games that didn’t have “playoff implications”
Let that sink in a moment before talking Super Bowls.
The 70s teams had the best collection of talent ever. But there wasn’t one player as responsible, and it was basically an 8 year stretch and it was over. Players like TB were actually somewhat poor at times in the first few years.
Time will eventually provide perspective on this. It really isn’t close
No. But there was also no salary cap then, the Steelers just drafted from 1969-1974 just unbelievably. I think outside of 1973 draft, they drafted at least 1 HOFer in each draft and in 1974 they ended up with 4 in one draft! That is just remarkable.Terry came to a team that was perennial losers - Ben came to an established team with a great defense. There is a difference. And that Steeler team won four Super Bowls in those eight years...this Steeler team hasn’t won jack in over a decade.
Screw FrancoJoe Greene is #1 and then there’s everyone else. When he arrived in ‘70, this franchise was a dumpster fire.
That being said, Ben is in the top 3-4. Personally, I’d have him at 2. Longevity, 3 Super Bowls, playing most important position, etc.
Terry Bradshaw is wayyyy up there too.
I’ll go: 1. Joe Greene
2. Ben
3. Terry Bradshaw
and 4-5 could come from Stautner, Lambert, Franco, Blount, Troy, Deebo, and AB.
Well, who was clearly better? I think the following guys: Montana, Manning, Brady, Unitas, Marino, Brees, Young, Favre and Elway. I would add Rodgers too. Mahomes as well though he is so early on. Any arguments or additions?
Then, you have the guys that clearly are or an argument can be made that they are the same level: Staubach, Namath, Kelly, Rivers, Tarkenton, Fouts, Moon, Bradshaw, Starr, Aikman. Maybe a young guy like Wilson as well. How about Stabler too?
I think it is clear Ben is somewhere in the top 15 of that group. His biggest issue in terms of all-time status is that he played at the same time or had some overlap with around 10-15 of the names listed. And, a lot of them were better than him.
Terry came to a team that was perennial losers - Ben came to an established team with a great defense. There is a difference. And that Steeler team won four Super Bowls in those eight years...this Steeler team hasn’t won jack in over a decade.
Contender? Three playoff wins in 10 years hardly warrants contender status. And when the rules changed to favor offenses, Terry won MVP. And I don’t get the turning over the roster statement - Ben hasn’t won anything since our top five defense went away.Having the second best record in the league is hardly “not winning Jack”
Sure, the playoffs were underachieving and goofy at times. Injuries killed them and the defense was downright bad at times. Shazier injury changed the dynamic of the defense, and the Lev/AB situations hurt the offense.
But Bradshaw was not even locked in as the starter as late as 1975. That’s when he emerged, but he also had the best defense ever. He was basically done by 1981. That’s how short his period as a consistent starter was (basically like 2015 to now)
Id never say TB wasn’t one of the most important figures in team history. He was huge in big games and had a historically good skill set.
But you also had to do a lot less as a QB back then and was on an elite team. Sure the rules changed, but he only had like 4 or 5 300 yard games. Ever.
Terry wouldn’t have been able to turn the roster over 3 times and continued being a contender for 18 years. Ben did.
Terry called his own plays.Having the second best record in the league is hardly “not winning Jack”
Sure, the playoffs were underachieving and goofy at times. Injuries killed them and the defense was downright bad at times. Shazier injury changed the dynamic of the defense, and the Lev/AB situations hurt the offense.
But Bradshaw was not even locked in as the starter as late as 1975. That’s when he emerged, but he also had the best defense ever. He was basically done by 1981. That’s how short his period as a consistent starter was (basically like 2015 to now)
Id never say TB wasn’t one of the most important figures in team history. He was huge in big games and had a historically good skill set.
But you also had to do a lot less as a QB back then and was on an elite team. Sure the rules changed, but he only had like 4 or 5 300 yard games. Ever.
Terry wouldn’t have been able to turn the roster over 3 times and continued being a contender for 18 years. Ben did.
All of your top 9 are definitely above Ben. Then you have Otto Graham that was All-Pro 7 times. So the top 10 is pretty much set.Well, who was clearly better? I think the following guys: Montana, Manning, Brady, Unitas, Marino, Brees, Young, Favre and Elway. I would add Rodgers too. Mahomes as well though he is so early on. Any arguments or additions?
Then, you have the guys that clearly are or an argument can be made that they are the same level: Staubach, Namath, Kelly, Rivers, Tarkenton, Fouts, Moon, Bradshaw, Starr, Aikman. Maybe a young guy like Wilson as well. How about Stabler too?
I think it is clear Ben is somewhere in the top 15 of that group. His biggest issue in terms of all-time status is that he played at the same time or had some overlap with around 10-15 of the names listed. And, a lot of them were better than him.
They never make the first Super Bowl if he's not on the rosterRemember when Ben got carried by his defense and running game when he threw for under 100 yards to win his first Super Bowl.
Remember when he got carried through the playoffs to win his 2nd Super Bowl by throwing only 1 TD against 5 ints in 2 playoff games.
Remember his 3 turnovers in his 3rd Super Bowl.
Remember his 3 interceptions in his 4th Super Bowl.
I'd rather have an A-Hole who takes me to a few Super Bowls, rather than a nice guy who sucks, but helps the community, He's just a character in my TV show, I don't give a crap if he's a good person, I don't want to meet him, I don't collect autographs, I don't want to have a few beers with his fat asss UNLESS HE'S BUYING. I don't even care if he dies from CTE dementia, because he's not really that good anymore, and he won't help my TV show be good, so I'm good with discarding him now that he's spent.Nah, most who have meet the dude shares a similar opinion of him. I have heard much worse from others. It's not like I said, I'm looking forward to his CTE to take him out like many others have.
Terry was on a team where he had a dozen hall of famers, not allowed to leave in free agency for a dozen years,Terry came to a team that was perennial losers - Ben came to an established team with a great defense. There is a difference. And that Steeler team won four Super Bowls in those eight years...this Steeler team hasn’t won jack in over a decade.
Franco was a great RB for my team, I love Franco, as far as I'm concerned he can suck JoePa off all he wants, and I still like him. Met him at a tailgate party he's a nice guy.Screw Franco
Nobody's been allowed to do that for 30 years, and it's been argued that Ben does too pretty often.Terry called his own plays.
I'd rather have an A-Hole who takes me to a few Super Bowls, rather than a nice guy who sucks, but helps the community, He's just a character in my TV show, I don't give a crap if he's a good person, I don't want to meet him, I don't collect autographs, I don't want to have a few beers with his fat asss UNLESS HE'S BUYING. I don't even care if he dies from CTE dementia, because he's not really that good anymore, and he won't help my TV show be good, so I'm good with discarding him now that he's spent.
Terry would of never won crap without having the #1 all time greatest hall of fame NFL defenses every season of his entire career.Contender? Three playoff wins in 10 years hardly warrants contender status. And when the rules changed to favor offenses, Terry won MVP. And I don’t get the turning over the roster statement - Ben hasn’t won anything since our top five defense went away.
Thanks, meant every word of it, it really encapsulates WHO I AM.Solid rant here. 👍
Believe it or not, Terry's very first 300 yard passing game was while winning their 3rd Super Bowl vs, Dallas ind Super Bowl XIII....he only had like 4 or 5 300 yard games. Ever.
Terry wouldn’t have been able to turn the roster over 3 times and continued being a contender for 18 years. Ben did.
But Bradshaw started with a Steelers team that was at rock bottom and Ben started with a Super Bowl contending team. Also, Bradshaw's first seven seasons were at a time when receivers got mugged down field along pass blocking rules that put the O-line at a disadvantage, Bradshaw would have put up Peyton Manning type numbers with today's rules.Terry was on a team where he had a dozen hall of famers, not allowed to leave in free agency for a dozen years,
None of that makes Bradshaw's accomplishments better, the fact remains, once the SUPER HALL OF FAME ROSTER was in place by 1974, no QB in history ever had a more star studded supporting castBut Bradshaw started with a Steelers team that was at rock bottom and Ben started with a Super Bowl contending team. Also, Bradshaw's first seven seasons were at a time when receivers got mugged down field along pass blocking rules that put the O-line at a disadvantage, Bradshaw would have put up Peyton Manning type numbers with today's rules.
Thanks, meant every word of it, it really encapsulates WHO I AM.
That was the joke...Those were all Terry Bradshaw.They never make the first Super Bowl if he's not on the roster
He personally wins his second Super Bowl with the greatest game winning drive in Super Bowl history
Losing one of three Super Bowls means you got there three times, How many QBs got there 3 times?
Never played in a 4th SB
The truth is, the Steelers last Super Bowl appearance is 1996, Super Bowl XXX, if they never draft Ben
See....I view free agency differently because yes, players didn't move as often but all those teams kept their core players as well. The Raiders, Cowboys, 49ers and Houston didn't lose players and they all grew together. So when you had to face the likes of Campbell, Bethea, Sistrunk, Upshaw, Branch, et al every single season ...those teams didn't decline because of player defections...they got stronger.Terry was on a team where he had a dozen hall of famers, not allowed to leave in free agency for a dozen years,
Swann and Stallworth weren't even starters in 1974, Bradshaw had to throw to the likes of Frank Lewis, Ron Shanklin and Larry Brown, Webster was splitting time with Ray Mansfield. Sure the D was one of the best ever but the O was still a season away from having legit threats at WR and then you had DB's trying to flat out murder Swann from 75 onward.None of that makes Bradshaw's accomplishments better, the fact remains, once the SUPER HALL OF FAME ROSTER was in place by 1974, no QB in history ever had a more star studded supporting cast
Blount definitely was the best corner of his time. Was Franco better than OJ or Walter Payton? Lambert was the 2nd or 3rd best MLB of the 70's. Jack Ham was widely regarded as the best OLB of his era. Is Ben top 5 of his era?#1 @ #2 are clearly Joe Green and Ernie Stautner. After that it gets tough. I'd still have to put Lambert, Harris and Blount ahead of Ben because they were all the best at their position for multiple seasons while winning championships.
Ben may have been the best QB in the NFL for a season or 2 but not while winning anything and he never seemed like a solid leader like Troy, Woodson and Bradshaw were.
That's a tough top 10 to break into.
That didn't matter, throwing was an afterthought to that team, Terry was basically a handoff monkey that year, go look at his stats for 1974, he only started half the games, lost his job.Swann and Stallworth weren't even starters in 1974, Bradshaw had to throw to the likes of Frank Lewis, Ron Shanklin and Larry Brown, Webster was splitting time with Ray Mansfield. Sure the D was one of the best ever but the O was still a season away from having legit threats at WR and then you had DB's trying to flat out murder Swann from 75 onward.
He doesn't have to be because the equation is this simple, don't draft Ben in 2003, still stuck on 4 Super Bowl wins, PERIOD.Blount definitely was the best corner of his time. Was Franco better than OJ or Walter Payton? Lambert was the 2nd or 3rd best MLB of the 70's. Jack Ham was widely regarded as the best OLB of his era. Is Ben top 5 of his era?
Um...clearly you didn't see those last two Super Bowls where the offense carried the Steelers!Terry would of never won crap without having the #1 all time greatest hall of fame NFL defenses every season of his entire career.
But if say the Chargers or Giants take Ben and either Eli or Rivers fall to the Steelers, you don't think either of them would have won 2 Super Bowls with the teams Ben had? Or the Steelers pass on Ben and end up in a position to draft Aaron Rodgers the next year, you don't think he's winning 2 rings with the same teams Ben had.He doesn't have to be because the equation is this simple, don't draft Ben in 2003, still stuck on 4 Super Bowl wins, PERIOD.
Rumor has it the Steelers really wanted Phil Rivers in that draft. If he would have been the pick, how many Super Bowls do the Steelers win during his career?He doesn't have to be because the equation is this simple, don't draft Ben in 2003, still stuck on 4 Super Bowl wins, PERIOD.
But if say the Chargers or Giants take Ben and either Eli or Rivers fall to the Steelers, you don't think either of them would have won 2 Super Bowls with the teams Ben had? Or the Steelers pass on Ben and end up in a position to draft Aaron Rodgers the next year, you don't think he's winning 2 rings with the same teams Ben had.
So you're using his 1974 season as proof that he could overcome his WR talent. Have you looked at what he did in 1974?Swann and Stallworth weren't even starters in 1974, Bradshaw had to throw to the likes of Frank Lewis, Ron Shanklin and Larry Brown, Webster was splitting time with Ray Mansfield. Sure the D was one of the best ever but the O was still a season away from having legit threats at WR and then you had DB's trying to flat out murder Swann from 75 onward.
CB was paying a lot more, too. I agree that he should have considered the move but he was still in demand as a CB.Had Woodson moved to safety like the Steelers wanted him to he may have continued his domination and played here his whole career. His ego made him play CB for a cpl more years when he lost a little. When he finally went to S he was once again a pro bowler.
True. He did play CB even for the Ravens the first year I believe after the Raider and 49er stints.CB was paying a lot more, too. I agree that he should have considered the move but he was still in demand as a CB.
Woodson is kind of ignored because he left but he was absolutely one of the most dominant players at his position while in PGH.True. He did play CB even for the Ravens the first year I believe after the Raider and 49er stints.
Regardless he was some player. According to Wikipedia he was the first player to go to the Pro Bowl as a CB, Safety and Kick returner. Don’t know if anyone else ever did it but that’s pretty remarkable.
Sure, and I'd use the same argument to say that without drafting <Fill in the blank QB> the Steelers never get One for the Thumb.But if say the Chargers or Giants take Ben and either Eli or Rivers fall to the Steelers, you don't think either of them would have won 2 Super Bowls with the teams Ben had? Or the Steelers pass on Ben and end up in a position to draft Aaron Rodgers the next year, you don't think he's winning 2 rings with the same teams Ben had.
Rumor has it the Steelers really wanted Phil Rivers in that draft. If he would have been the pick, how many Super Bowls do the Steelers win during his career?