Looks like we are not recruiting good enough for this league?ACC incoming recruits this year, top 100 in bold:
Looks like we are not recruiting good enough for this league?ACC incoming recruits this year, top 100 in bold:
if they handed out NCAA champ trophies based on recruiting rankings, sureLooks like we are not recruiting good enough for this league?
Just got off the phone with Holden and Reece Heller. I hope to have a story on them for you guys soon. There are already a few that should be posted in the next week or so. Should be plenty of new content on the site soon.are the hellers going to help us.
What I got from the staff is that they expect Camacho to be at 125 next year. Otherwise, that could be a real problem. I haven't been able to connect with Codie Cuerbo for an interview yet, but he was a 113-pounder this year, so it's hard to ask him to step into a D-I lineup at 125 next year.So we have a gaping hole at 125 for now.
My only concern is this is the year that Pitt is really loading up and still trails the other schools. With a big class this year, I don't think they'll have the money to bring in much next season.if they handed out NCAA champ trophies based on recruiting rankings, sure
I don't see the rest of the ACC reloading as a bad thing; if we are behind VT/NCSU/UVa in recruiting rankings this year but ahead of 65 other schools out of 80, that's a good result imo. Puts us ahead of a lot of teams and closer to where the staff wants to be (which I don't think has anything to do with the ACC tbh). Ofc I am biased, but I also think our incoming guys are underrated across the board.
That's good news, Eric. Thanks. Is there any word yet about where Poulin may be headed?What I got from the staff is that they expect Camacho to be at 125 next year. Otherwise, that could be a real problem. I haven't been able to connect with Codie Cuerbo for an interview yet, but he was a 113-pounder this year, so it's hard to ask him to step into a D-I lineup at 125 next year.
Recruiting rankings are just a matter of opinion. No way Pitzer should be that low, I would have thought he’d be a top 20 recruit.Keslar is top 100 on a few other rankings too
That says more about the flaws in the ranking system than anything elsePriests low ranking has a lot to do with his lack of national event participation. Most of the guys ranked do the full circuit: Fargo, super 32, journeyman, elite 8, Disney duals, etc
Not sure about depth, both are top 15-25 guys at their weight and huge improvements over who we'd be starting at 65&84 next year. We should be very good at 165 the next two years with Holden starting, then one of Laffey/Keslar/Pletcher/McKay takes over. Not quite as confident in 184 for now since either Reece or Luca will have to move up. Then Lledo as a solid backup for 74/84.Going to have to watch some of their matches this weekend now I guess. Seems like a couple of solid depth pickups though at the very least
Actually yeah, the more I think about it your question is def valid. Two things I will still point out: our depth at 157 (Badgett, Mancini, three freshmen) is much better than 184 (Lledo and he's really a 74 i think), and if the Hellers were just wrestling up last year because they were redshirting and weren't gonna cut weight, then they did REALLY well.Do you think it’s possible that the Heller boys go 157 and 165 and Pitt is still looking for a 184?
Good pointI’d imagine the New York connection with Troy Nickerson being the head coach may have played a role with Poulin going there.
Lost to a Manuel Rojas who is still in high school this year, I think his ceiling is a round of 12 guy.Drop down to 165 and nijenhuis would be awesome
I'm pretty sure one of the Hellers beat NijenhuisDrop down to 165 and nijenhuis would be awesome