Was vicious.
all the guys playing well.
all the guys playing well.
Was vicious.
all the guys playing well.
That D3 player was dominating almost everyone. He was the talk of the Senior Bowl. He did get Jones on one rep. That is what you are referring to.There was a viral clip of Jones getting stoned by a D3 player during practice this week.
Also if him blowing past Alabama’s first round pickThere was a viral clip of Jones getting stoned by a D3 player during practice this week.
Also if him blowing past Alabama’s first round pick
When I saw he was D3, I immediately thought of a handful of programs, Wisconsin-Whitewater being one of them. No surprise that’s where he’s from.
Who cares about one rep or two. Jones has a ton of tape showing that he can play football very well. He will be fine and get a good contract to start.
ESPN didn't give Jones good grades at all..
![]()
10 prospects rising and falling at the Senior Bowl: Who has impressed NFL scouts
These are the prospects from the 2021 class who raised and lowered their draft stock at this week's Senior Bowl.www.espn.com
"While Jones is still a bit of a project on the edge based on his traits, his production over the past two seasons is a big part of his appeal. He had 17.5 sacks over the past two seasons. But his experience in Mobile started poorly when he checked in with only 32-inch arms despite being 6-4, which is well below the desired length for an edge defender.
It didn't get much better when he hit the field against the better tackles at the Senior Bowl and that production disappeared. He only won 11% percent of his reps on the week in the one-on-ones and looked out of his depth when asked to rush from the interior. Jones came in as a possible first-rounder but now looks like a late Day 2 possibility."
Practice stats are the absolute worst. There have been UDFAs at Steelers training camp who looked good when matched up one on one, then as soon as they got in game action they disappeared. Jones film will speak for itself. I never saw him mentioned as a first-round prospect, so I'm not quite sure where ESPN was getting that information. High end I've seen is first and low end fourth.
High end you've seen is first? So how haven't you seen him mentioned as a first round prospect? Those are the same thing.
I get you and I remember that you called Jones before the Steelers drafted him. You said that he was going to suck essentially. And, you were right. Jarvis Jones, I mean.Everything I heard out of the major outlets was he struggled all week.
One thing that scouts aren't going to use as a denominator is sacks. It's winning reps. A case in point is Jarvis Jones. He played in a 3-4 where he was being stunted all over the place. I remember naysayers were pointing out that he rarely wins straight up 1 on 1 matchups. However, he put up a ton of sacks. Then he had a horrible combine. Still drafted in the 1st round but was a complete and utter bust.
I don't know Patrick's win rate, but I do know we create a ton of our pressure with our zone blitz.
I get you and I remember that you called Jones before the Steelers drafted him. You said that he was going to suck essentially. And, you were right. Jarvis Jones, I mean.
FWIW, I think Patrick is a lot better than that guy. He seemingly dominated 1 on 1 at times during actual games. He even put up a sack in this one. He is generally a load and clearly is a solid athlete.
I am not saying the guy is a first rounder, but I would be plenty surprised if he did not have a nice NFL career. He fits the profile and is a guy that by all accounts works hard.