Pitt hasn't won in Chapel Hill in like forever. Maybe ever?
Ever is the correct answer.
Pitt hasn't won in Chapel Hill in like forever. Maybe ever?
schneid A game, series of games, or period during which a team has been shut out or a batter has gone hitless.
schneider To shut out. ... ETYMOLOGY. According to Harold Wentworth and Stuart Berg Flexner (Dictionary of American Slang, 1960), the term came originally from the German and Yiddish "schneider" for one who cuts cloth, or a tailor. On its way to baseball, it appears to have become a gin rummy term for preventing an opponent from scoring a point in a game or match.
And now Kamara has opted to RS and transfer from South Carolina. Good luck to him. I’ll stick with Louis and Biles.Yeah the LBers are super athletic. No wonder they didn’t flinch at DeShields and Kamara leaving.
Kamara and Hayes were troublemakers at Pitt.And now Kamara has opted to RS and transfer from South Carolina. Good luck to him. I’ll stick with Louis and Biles.
I’ll have to take your word on Kamara. But Hayes beat his gf and was a general pain in the ass about NIL. Hayes may have helped bolster our DL this year, but no one was going to confuse him with a Pat Jones or Ejuan Price either.Kamara and Hayes were troublemakers at Pitt.
See ya.
He didn't get much playing time at USCe, and I feel he wouldn't have gotten much playing time this year if he had stayed at Pitt.And now Kamara has opted to RS and transfer from South Carolina. Good luck to him. I’ll stick with Louis and Biles.
Hayes was more hype based on potential than actual production. He probably would have been better than the dude they got from Clemson but he also would have been a distraction in the locker room Sam O from what I can tell isn’t setting the world on fire at UC either. I suspect he’ll transfer out at the end of the year.I’ll have to take your word on Kamara. But Hayes beat his gf and was a general pain in the ass about NIL. Hayes may have helped bolster our DL this year, but no one was going to confuse him with a Pat Jones or Ejuan Price either.
Hayes was more hype based on potential than actual production. He probably would have been better than the dude they got from Clemson but he also would have been a distraction in the locker room Sam O from what I can tell isn’t setting the world on fire at UC either. I suspect he’ll transfer out at the end of the year.
It’s always a rationalization.No, he wouldn't have "probably" been better; he would have been better. What did he do in the locker room that makes you so confident he would have been a distraction? I know he had an off the field incident, but I'm curious what you know that makes you claim he would have been a distraction in the locker room.
On the way out he said he didn’t think the team was good enough to win. Do you think a guy who isnt team first which is the culture Pitt has would be “ good “ in the locker room?No, he wouldn't have "probably" been better; he would have been better. What did he do in the locker room that makes you so confident he would have been a distraction? I know he had an off the field incident, but I'm curious what you know that makes you claim he would have been a distraction in the locker room.
On the way out he said he didn’t think the team was good enough to win. Do you think a guy who isnt team first which is the culture Pitt has would be “ good “ in the locker room?
There’s a guy in Pittsburgh who says we want volunteers not Hostages
So with Hayes would we be more undefeated by now ? Would the defense have given up less than 17 points to UNC ?The one who hasn't won a playoff game in almost 9 years? Hayes led the ACC in pressure rate last season. The dude from Clemson can't get on the field even though the d-line depth is paper thin. The fact that we were willing to give Hayes multiple NIL bumps should tell you how much he was valued. I don't care what he said after he left the team; he would be a welcomed addition to this defense.
So with Hayes would we be more undefeated by now ? Would the defense have given up less than 17 points to UNC ?
Pitt won 3 games with Hayes last year. Just saying. So it’s debatable how much if any difference he’d make this yearI didn't realize it was a 5-game season and there isn't any room for improvement. If we go 9-3 and lose two one-score games, will I be allowed to say that Hayes might have made a difference?
It is what it is, and obviously he left the team in a doofus fashion. But let's not pretend like his presence would not be welcomed or that he and the Clemson dude, who will likely be finishing his football career at a lower level, are tit for tat.
Pitt won 3 games with Hayes last year. Just saying. So it’s debatable how much if any difference he’d make this year
And the Angels have been below .500 for nine seasons in a row with Mike Trout, six of which included Ohtani - two of the best players in baseball history. Would you like 9,000 other examples as to why your statement makes no sense, or can we stop at that one?
It's almost as if this isn't an individual sport or something.
Offense is helping win games .So with Hayes would we be more undefeated by now ? Would the defense have given up less than 17 points to UNC ?
Hayes aint no Curtis Martin Talent...................Those 10 tackles and 1 sack are quite impressive though.Here's a fun one:
Pitt's records by season with Curtis Martin, the NFL's 6th all time rushing leader:
6-5
3-9
3-8
3-8
But yeah - let's throw the baby out with the bathwater as we struggle to understand the concept of nuance.
Hayes aint no Curtis Martin Talent...................Those 10 tackles and 1 sack are quite impressive though.
My argument is Hayes is an incremental improvement at BEST. He wont sniff the NFL. Glad to help the helplessAnd that's a straw man. Your insinuation was that Hayes sucks because the team was 3-9 with him here. So Curtis Martin, who had 607 touches while at Pitt, must really suck under that logic. Of course, the only thing that sucks in this case is your logic.
What odds ya giving ?My argument is Hayes is an incremental improvement at BEST. He wont sniff the NFL. Glad to help the helpless
My argument is Hayes is an incremental improvement at BEST. He wont sniff the NFL. Glad to help the helpless
UDFA at best. There are literally dozens of Hayes in CFB who have better motors and are More consistent If he hadn’t been at Pitt no one would know who he isWhat odds ya giving ?
Good size athleticism as an edge
So long odds ?UDFA at best. There are literally dozens of Hayes in CFB who have better motors and are More consistent If he hadn’t been at Pitt no one would know who he is