Exactly the same push off nc state did offensively to us twice last week
??? Of course it works that way. How the hell would you know who would pay them offSorry man, that’s not how it works. This number kept edging up due to sharp play on Pitt, not total money. Books that I know of here in Vegas actually need Pitt slightly or have no real decision on the game.
They must have known that Narduzzi was going to ice him.I do like the fact that we have a kicker who has made eight field goals over 50 yards with a long of 56 and they have the "field goal line" on the field at the 28 yard line.
It was twice it was every pass to that big wr they haveExactly the same push off nc state did offensively to us twice last week
Right, should have called timeout after the sack on first down.Piss poor use of the clock and timeouts. We may not have Clemson talent but we sure don’t need coaching that makes these kids jobs harder
Clearly. You only climb out of the trash can on days when things are challenging. Pitt is up 10 if the officiating is even 75% competent.Just horrible clock management and settling for a 55 yard attempt is just unacceptable I am really ready to move on from Narduzzi and for sure Whipple
He’s right. Pitt should be winning.Love Hafley's comment... "this game should not be this close"
We should have called to on defense, but not sure how we had poor clock management on offense. Pickett isn’t the brightest guy in that regard, but he didn’t do anything out of the ordinarytime management on that drive was horrific
Yeah he is probably mad at himself for not calling more corner routes, because it appears we cannot cover it.Love Hafley's comment... "this game should not be this close"
Is it a spot foul if less than 15 yards?OK, so it wouldn't have probably made a difference anyway, but we have 3rd and 21 on our own 49 yard line. We complete a pass for 14 yards to the 37 yard line. BC is called for pass interference. If we take the penalty it's 1st and 10 from the 36, if we decline the penalty it's 4th and 7 from the BC 37. Can anyone explain to me why we declined the penalty?
As I said, it probably doesn't matter anyway. But taking the penalty makes the field goal one yard shorter and if something bizarre were to happen it would have been first down instead of fourth down. What possible thought process is someone going through that leads you to decline that penalty?
Nah it was a hard legal hit, but they threw the flag, so they made up for the bad call by giving Morrissey a personal foul for talking to a guy.It's still a late hit. I agree it is not dirty, but it's a penalty every time. It's been called that way for the past 30 years.
Yawn. Come on we have 200 yards on offense and BC has like 215? Just a pretty even game. Seems pretty entertaining to me. I mean if you just want to wait each year to watch Alabama vs Clemson, then just do it.Pitt is just not that good on either side of the ball. This is merely a battle of 3 stars.
Is it a spot foul if less than 15 yards?
OK, so it wouldn't have probably made a difference anyway, but we have 3rd and 21 on our own 49 yard line. We complete a pass for 14 yards to the 37 yard line. BC is called for pass interference. If we take the penalty it's 1st and 10 from the 36, if we decline the penalty it's 4th and 7 from the BC 37. Can anyone explain to me why we declined the penalty?
As I said, it probably doesn't matter anyway. But taking the penalty makes the field goal one yard shorter and if something bizarre were to happen it would have been first down instead of fourth down. What possible thought process is someone going through that leads you to decline that penalty?
we got the first down with the catch
Pitt is just not that good on either side of the ball. This is merely a battle of 3 stars.