ADVERTISEMENT

Pitt vs Louisville - Volleyball Game Thread

I stayed up and watched the second game. Penn State gutted out the third set and really frustrated Nebraska in the fourth. Was wild seeing Nebraska rush the court, only to have the point overturned and then lose a few serves later. Nebraska relaxed a little but PSU really frustrated Harper Murray. She started to press and it led to a lot of hitting errors. Gotta hand it to PSU. They really came into their own as the season progressed and Izzy Starck's improvement showed why she was such a coveted player out of HS.
 
Again, watch the difference in substitutions the other three final four teams make versus us. Bayliss came in once a set to give a short break to a hitter. Jones and Kelly replaced each other. Fisher took Fairbanks out for one point. Other than that, the only substitutions are at server.

Louisville substitutes a little less than PSU or Nebraska but more than us. Diaz-Maldonado, usually their fourth outside hitter, had a monster game. 14 kills. Robins had 5. They had 10 more kills than our third and 4th hitters. D-M also was effective in the back row and at setter.

It’s a long season. Players are tired. We are less used to playing long matches than any other team because we had so many sweeps. PSU and Nebraska shuttle 2 or 3 players at a time in and out consistently. They are going to stay fresher than our players. Babcock is a machine but even she could use a rest. Stafford clearly was less effective hitting in the final two sets.

If Bayliss is not good in the back row, don’t play her there. Our middles don’t play in the back row. Very few middles do. I have never seen Reese Robins play in the back or serve but she had 5 kills against us in the front. Diaz-Maldonado is good from the back so she plays there.

Louisville had an extraordinary match in serve-receive. They probably have never matched it against another opponent. Two serve-receive errors, both by DeBeers. (We had 8. 4 by VVG.)

We needed more pieces and to get over this hump
Excluding designated servers, PSU and Nebraska each had 10 players who played in all 5 sets. Louisville had 10 players (plus one designated server) who played in all 4 sets. We only had 8. And Bayliss had less touches than any of the non-starters for the other 3 teams. She played one rotation in the back row and had two touches — both receiving errors. She played one rotation per set in the front row and had one kill and one hitting error on two swings. Hitting percentage 0.000.

I would love to know how many points we scored on Cat Flood’s serves during the tournament. She has been an important factor for Pitt all year, but without looking at the box scores it seems to me that we lost most of the points she served during the tournament. Meyer was our only designated server who, just based on observation, was effective. There were times during the year when Fisher went with the hot hand. But, it seems to me that in the tournament, Flood served more than she should have based on results.

We have some holes to fill. Fisher needs to hit the portal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: veryrustyred
I stayed up and watched the second game. Penn State gutted out the third set and really frustrated Nebraska in the fourth. Was wild seeing Nebraska rush the court, only to have the point overturned and then lose a few serves later. Nebraska relaxed a little but PSU really frustrated Harper Murray. She started to press and it led to a lot of hitting errors. Gotta hand it to PSU. They really came into their own as the season progressed and Izzy Starck's improvement showed why she was such a coveted player out of HS.
Harper Murray had the one serving streak when they scored six straight on her serve and it looked like that was going to win the fourth set for them. When the match point call was reversed that seemed to take all of the wind out of their sails.

Harper Murray is very good. But, she is not in the same galaxy as Babcock as an offensive weapon. She hit .172 and she had 10 hitting errors, 3 service errors and 4 receiving errors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pittdan77
Harper Murray had the one serving streak when they scored six straight on her serve and it looked like that was going to win the fourth set for them. When the match point call was reversed that seemed to take all of the wind out of their sails.

Harper Murray is very good. But, she is not in the same galaxy as Babcock as an offensive weapon. She hit .172 and she had 10 hitting errors, 3 service errors and 4 receiving errors.
Yeah, I watched the whole thing. It was such a wild swing. I really hope Murray just stays out of her DM's. That fan base is ridiculous sometimes. They just have so much talent but they've been frustrated by some pretty epic games by tournament opponents. I think the only real question is how long Cook is going to stick around. The thought is that Dani Busboom Kelly really wants that job but I'm not entirely convinced that they won't give it to someone who is already there, again.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT