Acc football would be legit. No clue why they would do it from their perspective thoughThat leads to the huge revenue increase for all members through an acc tv network
If the $$$ is right, then they will do it.Acc football would be legit. No clue why they would do it from their perspective though
Only way the money is right is if they can keep their own TV deal without their NBC-TV deal the money is nowhere near rightIf the $$$ is right, then they will do it.
If the football $ is the same, then they would get a lot more exposure for the rest of their athletic programs and their University through the ACC Network.I don't believe this one. He is speculating obviously, but I don't see ND giving up independence.
If the football $ is the same, then they would get a lot more exposure for the rest of their athletic programs and their University through the ACC Network.
If the football $ is the same, then they would get a lot more exposure for the rest of their athletic programs and their University through the ACC Network.
I bet you see an NBC/ESPN (ABC) deal for broadcast rights where NBC really becomes relevant in College sports.That leads to the huge revenue increase for all members through an acc tv network
I bet you see an NBC/ESPN (ABC) deal for broadcast rights where NBC really becomes relevant in College sports.
Texas or Penn State comes in with ND. My guess would be Texas but both would really provide a huge docket of coverage to throw at many channels. You would not need an ACC Network.
I have been saying for a long time there is a reason Dallas is America's Team and its because they play in the NFC East ( which makes zero sense) but it works. It will for the Longhorns too.
I don't want to get too greedy but Georgia and Kentucky sure would be nice too.
They play NY,Philly,Washington twice per year and they played in Super Bowl often when they got the name.They are "America's team" only because Art Rooney declined being tabbed as "America's team". This has nothing to do with anything past a marketing ploy.
Well didn't he just say that he heard ND was joining the BIG 10 soon? Then had to backtrack after he heard they signed the 25 year agreement with the ACC when they joined. I don't consider him well sourced in these matters
The details are hazy to me right now, but wouldn't the path to the College Football Playoff be much easier if they were an actual member of the ACC vs. the path they have now? That right there may be worth it for them to officially jump.
I don't believe this one. He is speculating obviously, but I don't see ND giving up independence.
They play NY,Philly,Washington twice per year and they played in Super Bowl often when they got the name.
My point is Dallas is not in the East but play in the East often. Texas could also in the ACC.
I kind of thought you could connect the dots and realize it takes a lot of wins to go to the Super Bowl, WIN the Super Bowl and win more games to go to more Super Bowls.SO......it wasnt wins on the field that got them to the Super Bowl? It was the moniker "America's Team" that got them Super Bowl rings........
I never knew that.
Been hearing this for 20 years now. Different conferences, same rumor.That leads to the huge revenue increase for all members through an acc tv network
Ummmm...No chance they would leave the cash cow SEC.I bet you see an NBC/ESPN (ABC) deal for broadcast rights where NBC really becomes relevant in College sports.
Texas or Penn State comes in with ND. My guess would be Texas but both would really provide a huge docket of coverage to throw at many channels. You would not need an ACC Network.
I have been saying for a long time there is a reason Dallas is America's Team and its because they play in the NFC East ( which makes zero sense) but it works. It will for the Longhorns too.
I don't want to get too greedy but Georgia and Kentucky sure would be nice too.
I just don't see what leverage the ACC has or why ND would feel any pressure whatsoever to change anything? Without some sort of game-changing leverage, it's just not going to happen...ever.
I'd love to be proven wrong here, but I don't think that I am.
ND would be heavily involved in the ACC network no matter what...everything but their home football game broadcasts. ND is a full legal member of the ACC. They would get a cut of the network minus what would be calculated to be earned from football broadcasts (likely a healthy chunk).
If you take a cue from the existing ACC Digital Network, their football program will even get covered; just won't have games broadcast. The ACC/ESPN could feasibly put the 2 to 3 ND-ACC away games on the ACCN each year anyway.
Take what Brando says with a grain of salt. He's just speculating...no more than any internet blogger does. ThePanthers knows more about realignment, conference, and network/media issues than Brando does (and I'm being totally serious).
The details are hazy to me right now, but wouldn't the path to the College Football Playoff be much easier if they were an actual member of the ACC vs. the path they have now? That right there may be worth it for them to officially jump.
I bet you see an NBC/ESPN (ABC) deal for broadcast rights where NBC really becomes relevant in College sports.
Texas or Penn State comes in with ND. My guess would be Texas but both would really provide a huge docket of coverage to throw at many channels. You would not need an ACC Network.
I have been saying for a long time there is a reason Dallas is America's Team and its because they play in the NFC East ( which makes zero sense) but it works. It will for the Longhorns too.
I don't want to get too greedy but Georgia and Kentucky sure would be nice too.
This almost came to a head last year. If ND had beaten Stanford in the last game of the season, they would have been ranked #6. Certainly they would have leap-frogged the loser of the Michigan State-Iowa Big 10 championship game. But that would have left them firmly at #5 and out of the playoffs. And with no conference championship game of their own, they would have no way to advance their position.I don't believe this one. He is speculating obviously, but I don't see ND giving up independence.
Exactly. Their road right now to the CFP is harder as an independent in many ways.This almost came to a head last year. If ND had beaten Stanford in the last game of the season, they would have been ranked #6. Certainly they would have leap-frogged the loser of the Michigan State-Iowa Big 10 championship game. But that would have left them firmly at #5 and out of the playoffs. And with no conference championship game of their own, they would have no way to advance their position.
There would have been a lot of Irish fans howling.
I totally agree, but Va Tech and Miami thought the same thing about the BCS... Texas could see that and use it as a negative not to make that leap of faith.The details are hazy to me right now, but wouldn't the path to the College Football Playoff be much easier if they were an actual member of the ACC vs. the path they have now? That right there may be worth it for them to officially jump.
Why doesn't the ACC tell ESPN to go pound salt and work out a deal with NBC with ND as their showcase?
NBC, NBCSN, CNBC, USA can all show ACC football games.
Why doesn't the ACC tell ESPN to go pound salt and work out a deal with NBC with ND as their showcase?
NBC, NBCSN, CNBC, USA can all show ACC football games.
^^^^^
I knew this MI fan would be on here spouting off about ND!
Simple: If Notre Dame has 1 loss and every other Conference Champ only has 1 loss, then Notre Dame has a hard time getting in at 11-1 vs a 12-1 Conference Champ unless Notre Dame's Strength of Schedule is so much better than the Conference Champ's that it warrants Notre Dame being in the Top 4.Exactly. Their road right now to the CFP is harder as an independent in many ways.