I don't agree with Virginia over Pitt. If Pitt is out ok. Virginia shouldn't be in over Pitt.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. Oklahoma gets inBegs the question: ACC got 5 teams, if UNC beats NC St, does Pitt get in then? Or do they only give the ACC 4?
That is a f*cking joke. The last 30% of the season UVA was a$$.I don't agree with Virginia over Pitt. If Pitt is out ok. Virginia shouldn't be in over Pitt.
Really?Virginia has a better resume and a better overall body of work. That isn't even questionable.
I'm not arguing Virginia deserves to be in the tournament. But their resume is better than Pitt's.
I don't agree with Virginia over Pitt. If Pitt is out ok. Virginia shouldn't be in over Pitt
what sticks out to me is Michigan St,I don't agree with Virginia over Pitt. If Pitt is out ok. Virginia shouldn't be in over Pitt.
Absolutely agree. IMHO, they are in only because of Tony Benett's name recognition and UVA's history in past years. Clear Bias, IMO.Virginia in and Pitt out is absolute bs
Man are you a pill!!!Virginia has a better resume and a better overall body of work. That isn't even questionable.
I'm not arguing Virginia deserves to be in the tournament. But their resume is better than Pitt's.
No it’s not better it’s not even close. They beat them head to head. Don’t play the games then. Pick teams based on head coaches then which is what they clearly did with Bennett and Virginia’s recent history.Virginia has a better resume and a better overall body of work. That isn't even questionable.
I'm not arguing Virginia deserves to be in the tournament. But their resume is better than Pitt's.
It appears strictly to be punishment for our out of conference scheduleI wish people would look at it differently. We know Pitt wasn’t going to win the title this year, neither will any of these bubble teams.
Pitt needs to improve their roster so they won’t be sitting around nervous on selection sunday.
I pretty much knew the committee would screw Pitt over if given the opportunity a few weeks ago
That’s what Bilas said. He said there are at least four teams that Pitt is clearly better thanIt appears strictly to be punishment for our out of conference schedule
No. Pitt's final NET rating was 40 and Virginia's was 55.Virginia has a better resume and a better overall body of work. That isn't even questionable.
I'm not arguing Virginia deserves to be in the tournament. But their resume is better than Pitt's.
Tell that to Clemson last year. Virginia was 10/10 q1/2 with no bad losses. And a win over Florida. It sucks. But not unreasonable.No it’s not better it’s not even close. They beat them head to head. Don’t play the games then. Pick teams based on head coaches then which is what they clearly did with Bennett and Virginia’s recent history.
That may very well be true, but if so, that’s the one thing you can’t really get pissed about. We decide our NC schedule, good thing to see the committee penalize schools for scheduling cupcakes.It appears strictly to be punishment for our out of conference schedule
If it would have been harder, even if we lost another game, maybe even two, we get in.
That reasoning is just F ing ridiculous.
Agree (to some extent)That may very well be true, but if so, that’s the one thing you can’t really get pissed about. We decide our NC schedule, good thing to see the committee penalize schools for scheduling cupcakes.
So if Pitt scheduled more tough occ games and had a 19-14 record do you think they get in? They wouldn’t even be the first four teams out. It’s all bullshitAgree (to some extent)
Bottom line - Capel underestimated his team.
Scheduled for best record possible, thinking we would not make the tournament.
What about Michigan st, why are they in over pittVirginia in and Pitt out is absolute bs
Totally disagree. But Im not sure you are even really a Pitt fan so I'm not really interested in debating it. Check out the sheets. The only metric they have better than us is Net Non conference schedule rating. We beat them everywhere else. St John's did as well. Believe me they are a very unimpressive tournament team. But hey they gamed their non conference schedule so kudos to them.Virginia has a better resume and a better overall body of work. That isn't even questionable.
I'm not arguing Virginia deserves to be in the tournament. But their resume is better than Pitt's.
The NET, Kenpom, head to head, and eye test all disagree you.Virginia has a better resume and a better overall body of work. That isn't even questionable.
I'm not arguing Virginia deserves to be in the tournament. But their resume is better than Pitt's.
Get real jerk. If that is your argument, then a 12 team tournament would be enough. I'm not even sure there are 12 teams that actually have a chance to win it all.Haha. Now your talking Quads and metrics. Pitt's NET last year was in the 60s. Look at the records, look at the OOC schedule, and look at the results instead of the computer nerd BS.
The head to head is really the only thing in Pitt's favor.
Irrelevant, because the purpose of the tournament is to determine a champion. And Pitt, nor UVA have any realistic chance of cutting down nets in April.
Yet, we would have been in if not for all the bid stealers.It appears strictly to be punishment for our out of conference schedule
If it would have been harder, even if we lost another game, maybe even two, we get in.
That reasoning is just F ing ridiculous.
absolutelyYet, we would have been in if not for all the bid stealers.
No, they don't.Virginia has a better resume and a better overall body of work. That isn't even questionable.
I'm not arguing Virginia deserves to be in the tournament. But their resume is better than Pitt's.