What was the TRIB saying yesterday about........

[California Panther]

Pitt having clinched finishing alone in last place in the ACC? That isn't correct, right? If Pitt beats ND Saturday, they both end up 3-15 in the ACC and tie for the last spot (so Pitt isn't alone there). Plus Pitt would get the #14 seed and ND #15 because of the head-to-head win, right? Is the PG wrong again or what?

 

[Fsgolfdr]

Pitt having clinched finishing alone in last place in the ACC? That isn't correct, right? If Pitt beats ND Saturday, they both end up 3-15 in the ACC and tie for the last spot (so Pitt isn't alone there). Plus Pitt would get the #14 seed and ND #15 because of the head-to-head win, right? Is the PG wrong again or what?

Really think that matters !

 

[Franb]

Pitt having clinched finishing alone in last place in the ACC? That isn't correct, right? If Pitt beats ND Saturday, they both end up 3-15 in the ACC and tie for the last spot (so Pitt isn't alone there). Plus Pitt would get the #14 seed and ND #15 because of the head-to-head win, right? Is the PG wrong again or what?

Where did you read that? Craig Meyers' column did not mention anything about Pitt's standing in the ACC, and his column on Tuesday clearly said that Pitt had the opportunity to beat ND to stay out of the bottom.

 

[Thee Jackie Treehorn]

I saw a Trib headline that claimed that.

 

[California Panther]

Where did you read that? Craig Meyers' column did not mention anything about Pitt's standing in the ACC, and his column on Tuesday clearly said that Pitt had the opportunity to beat ND to stay out of the bottom.

Oops, it was the Trib, sorry about that.

 

[California Panther]

Really think that matters !

No, it doesn't matter, just trying to point out errors in newspaper articles.

 

[Franb]

Oops, it was the Trib, sorry about that.

Gave me an opportunity to sharpen my fact-checking skills.