He‘d have a different opinion if a child wanted their parent to watch them perform in a pride parade.You must really suck at parenting
He‘d have a different opinion if a child wanted their parent to watch them perform in a pride parade.You must really suck at parenting
Nah- fostering independence is part of it .You must really suck at parenting
Of course the poster you’re addressing is wrong. He’s never right. Ever.I think you're all wrong there. If/when your son expresses an interest in or is naturally good at something - be it sports or whatever, as a parent you WILL nurture it and that includes being there if appropriate to show your support.. That is not being a helicopter parent.
Exactly. They took advantage of the uncertainty when the federal judge ruled against Wolf. Purposely did not come out and clarify what was/was not permissible.
Jagoff move by Wolf. It's Thursday and that's a problem because schools already sold tickets and now have the potential headache of dealing with refunds. Schools are having Homecoming and Senior Night events and have to deal with the restrictions again just over 24 hours before the game. Plans have to change and tomorrow he can change them again? They shouldn't be working on it as we speak, they should have worked on it for the past few weeks in anticipation of this ruling.
Everyday things change and to tell what the future holds just call Miss Cleo 😁😁lol. Who got the smackdown now?
They shouldn't be working on it as we speak, they should have worked on it for the past few weeks in anticipation of this ruling.
Or waiting to see if it was necessary due to courts ?Maybe, but that would have possibly required putting some logical, rational thought and some work into this. And if we've seen anything so far it's that that's been in seriously short supply.
Or waiting to see if it was necessary due to courts ?
So do you wait to start planning for things until you know for certain they are going to happen? I'm guessing that means you don't believe in insurance, because why worry about paying to fix your car if you are in an accident until you've actually been in one? And of course no need to put any money aside for retirement, because after all you may die before you get to collect any money, so might as well wait to see if it's necessary.
I mean seriously, your excuse for them is that there is no sense in planning for things until it's absolutely necessary? Man, that would be one hell of a way to govern.
Although to be fair, you may be exactly right that that's what those idiots did.
hey - I don’t disagree
As I’ve suggested :
Positivity rate below 3% for 3 consecutive weeks - things can reopen
Positivity rate between 3-5-% for 3 consecutive weeks - bars and restaurants close - no large gatherings
Positivity rate above 5% full shut down for non-essential services
Positivity 10% or above - full shelter in place
Clock resets for anytime a threshold is exceeedes
County by county
Masks are required in all public places , including outside .
how effin hard is that from a national or state level
I mean - mine is very conservative -Yeah, you can argue about the specific numbers, but it should be something as simple as that.
Which is why I had an issue with the metrics PA put out in the beginning with the red, yellow, green stuff. They put out a bunch of metrics and then literally from day one ignored their own numbers that they came up with when they decided that the numbers didn't suit what they wanted to do.
Determine your metrics. Tell everyone what those metrics are. Hold people to that standard. Shouldn't be that difficult.
But you understand what the real issue is here? You can set your metrics, guidelines to whatever, but when you diverge from them with no explanation, it loses all credibility.I mean - mine is very conservative -
But it’s better to tell people the thresholds ,because businesses can see the trends and prepare
I understandBut you understand what the real issue is here? You can set your metrics, guidelines to whatever, but when you diverge from them with no explanation, it loses all credibility.
You can't allow 20K people to gather months ago over a 4 day period and then unilaterally decide, never mind, no fans in stands for football.
Or how about it's ok to have 4K people INSIDE a casino but not 4K OUTSIDE in a stadium that is literally steps away.
It's totally random and illogical. And depending on the 3rd Circuit quite possibly unconstitutional.
I don't really care about any of the other states?I understand
Which is why I won’t deny that
But ya have to understand no state has clear and consistent guidelines
Pa isn’t unique