For me, the difference between a 3-4 star and a 4-5 star are the intangibles. They can all run. They can all catch. They can all jump, block, and tackle. The extra 'star' to me is the most important, because IMO it speaks to things like:
- How do they think?
- Are they disciplined?
- Are they leaders?
- Do they accept coaching?
- How do they react to pressure?
- Whats the work ethic?
- Are they consistent in their approach to the game and their development?
- Are they committed to perpetual improvement.
That's just how I look at the world. Most of these kids are good athletes - in the gym or on the track they'd impress all of us. Most of them work hard "most" of the time. Most of them pass the "eye test" but you have to dig deeper and that's really the art of recruiting, because the kids with the intangibles have lots of options. You're competing with the big dogs at that point, who are happy to get 4's to augment their 5's.
A mix of 3-4 star guys, weighted towards three gets you about what we have right now. A team that is largely mediocre but shows flashes of brilliance. Weight it towards four probably gets you the Miami game and the BC game. Maybe Virginia. Its how we can beat a team like Clemson from time to time, or compete with PSU down to the last possession, but it's also how we can struggle with Delaware. Pitts not going to get many, if any, 5-star guys, but if Narduzzi can shift the balance towards 4-star guys it should move the needle in a meaningful way PROVIDED the coaching is there to mold it into a cohesive team.