I don’t want her fired for hiring Capel. It was obviously a good hire at the time. I want her fired for extending 2 coaches when there was no one clamoring for their services and setting the programs back multiple years because she had her eyes on a big ten AD job.
So what? There’s certain jobs we aren’t gonna fend off anyways. Do you think there’s another ACC job that was gonna hire Capel other than Duke? And if they come he’s gone anyways. So the extension was beyond dumb.If you wait until others start clamoring for their services though, you're running behind. I didn't really have a problem with the Narduzzi extension given the recent history in the football program. I think the length of the extension was absurd coming o
So what? There’s certain jobs we aren’t gonna fend off anyways. Do you think there’s another ACC job that was gonna hire Capel other than Duke? And if they come he’s gone anyways. So the extension was beyond dumb.
Where was he gonna go? Michigan State? Literally no one else was gonna hire that gym teacher.I agree with you about Capel. I don't know about Narduzzi.
What you’re saying is true. But he was also praised and given a contract extension mostly based on that first class. You can’t have it both waysI chuckle at people says Capel has lost his entire first recruiting class - it wasn't like he had the luxury of attracting recruits to a top ten program. Pitt was coming off a winless conference record. Maybe what Capel had to grab wasn't all that talented nor good teammates. I will let this play out before I start bashing him or Lyke.
Well if that's the case - it was clearly a mis-read on Lyke's behalf.What you’re saying is true. But he was also praised and given a contract extension mostly based on that first class. You can’t have it both ways
We know your opinionWhere was he gonna go? Michigan State? Literally no one else was gonna hire that gym teacher.
Where was he gonna go? Michigan State? Literally no one else was gonna hire that gym teacher.
I thought it was a fantastic hire, and I still do.Not now. Not with the information of the last few years. But then. Alot of you want to fire Lyke because she hired Capel. But at the time.......what did you think? Great hire? Good hire? Meh? Bad hire? Dumpster Fire?
Answer honestly with some explanation.
Honestly, I thought it was a "great" hire at the time. Not good, great. Now I am being proven to be wrong, but that's fine, just trying to be honest. First of all we know where we were as a program, we know how Jamie was handled didn't sit so well in the coaching community. Nate Oats wasn't coming. Sean Miller wasn't allowed to be hired. He was blocked and everything that has happened the last few years shows that to have been a smart move. Plus, I see Miller more like his old coach, Paul Evans, they can recruit guys, but their teams are usually a mess. Mark Schmidt didn't move any one's needle. Danny Hurley was the other "guy", but he chose UConn. He hasn't been overwhelming as a success either.
Capel was to me, a great hire. ACC roots, #1 seat next to the Pope. Former HC. Great recruiter. Great personality. A salesman and PR dream as compared to the last two coaches in a city that is fine ignoring basketball. He embraced the city immediately. His recruiting class was a miracle.
But obviously something went amiss quickly. I don't know if he is all candy shell and nothing inside or what. But the hire obviously doesn't look good. But what say you? None of this revisionist history, what were your thoughts?
Capel getting X, Trey and Toney to come to a winless program in less than 6 weeks after getting the job was a fantastic recruiting haul. The people critical of his recruiting (and some of the criticism is definitely warranted) don’t seem to give him enough credit for nabbing those guys. However, to your point, when you are in hurry up mode you are going for the best talent you can find without much regard for the type of character they have. I’m not saying they are bad kids, but X, Trey and Toney were all annointed as starters early on and knew the coach had no choice but to play them no matter what. Perhaps after 2 or 3 years, Capel realized that those guys weren’t really buying into his program values and development of others because they were crowned as the building blocks of the program from their first arrival.I chuckle at people says Capel has lost his entire first recruiting class - it wasn't like he had the luxury of attracting recruits to a top ten program. Pitt was coming off a winless conference record. Maybe what Capel had to grab wasn't all that talented nor good teammates. I will let this play out before I start bashing him or Lyke.
It sounds like we should add him to our coaching staff.
This may have caused a little bit of a problem. He landed Zion more because of Coach K and Duke, and less because of his own recruiting prowess. For his second and third classes he may have been too optimistic about who he could lure to Pitt. Hopefully he resets his priorities a bit and focuses more on 75 to 150 type guys. Hugley didn't work out, but that is about where he should be recruiting.When word came out on Capel, it was great. His first press conference was great. His pedigree and experience seemed to check all the boxes, and he had just came off recruiting Zion, the best college player in the game.
The recruiting class and results in Year 1 were far better than I would've expected the day Stallings was fired. Everything since then has been a disappointment.What you’re saying is true. But he was also praised and given a contract extension mostly based on that first class. You can’t have it both ways
The recruiting class and results in Year 1 were far better than I would've expected the day Stallings was fired. Everything since then has been a disappointment.
You make an excellent point. You want a coach who has been successful with fewer resources. I like the last sentence as well.I thought it was a good hire ,but, I did (do) not like the fact that he played at Duke, recruited to Duke, recruited under a legend. I believe what you learn at Duke won't apply at most places. I coached and played enough to realize, its not the x's and o's, its the Michaels and Joes, in other words, there is no formula, you have to know enough basketball to tweak your game plan to make the best use of players, so I worried that he would not be able to recruit anywhere near the level he had been and still try the same schemes, etc. I would have preferred a scrappier "upbringing"for this job.
I thought he was a good hire and was glad to get him.
What's worrying is that Pitt may just be closer to BC and NC State in the college basketball firmament than to UNC. Many through Dixon under achieved and someone else could get us to a next level. Maybe we were punching far above our weight.
Excuse me?? I believe I have trade marked "gym teacher" in reference to HCPN and I believe I am owed royalties for every time it is used.Where was he gonna go? Michigan State? Literally no one else was gonna hire that gym teacher.
The recruiting class and results in Year 1 were far better than I would've expected the day Stallings was fired. Everything since then has been a disappointment.
The Horton episode was extremely odd.You guys act like Capel was going to conduct a thorough psychological profile on McGowens, Johnson, and Toney if he had more time to recruit in that first class. Those are guys he correctly brought in and would do so 100 times out of 100. The problem is the culture that he lets prevail (at least until it's past the point of no return). Listen to Horton talk... does he scream "head case" to anyone? He's about as well-spoken as it gets. And, next thing you know, he's stomping around the court and getting thrown out of games.
Capel's recruiting probably needs to be a lot better, but it's still not his biggest problem.
I thought Caple was a home run hire. And I still think that.
Not now. Not with the information of the last few years. But then. Alot of you want to fire Lyke because she hired Capel. But at the time.......what did you think? Great hire? Good hire? Meh? Bad hire? Dumpster Fire?
Answer honestly with some explanation.
Honestly, I thought it was a "great" hire at the time. Not good, great. Now I am being proven to be wrong, but that's fine, just trying to be honest. First of all we know where we were as a program, we know how Jamie was handled didn't sit so well in the coaching community. Nate Oats wasn't coming. Sean Miller wasn't allowed to be hired. He was blocked and everything that has happened the last few years shows that to have been a smart move. Plus, I see Miller more like his old coach, Paul Evans, they can recruit guys, but their teams are usually a mess. Mark Schmidt didn't move any one's needle. Danny Hurley was the other "guy", but he chose UConn. He hasn't been overwhelming as a success either.
Capel was to me, a great hire. ACC roots, #1 seat next to the Pope. Former HC. Great recruiter. Great personality. A salesman and PR dream as compared to the last two coaches in a city that is fine ignoring basketball. He embraced the city immediately. His recruiting class was a miracle.
But obviously something went amiss quickly. I don't know if he is all candy shell and nothing inside or what. But the hire obviously doesn't look good. But what say you? None of this revisionist history, what were your thoughts?
Not now. Not with the information of the last few years. But then. Alot of you want to fire Lyke because she hired Capel. But at the time.......what did you think? Great hire? Good hire? Meh? Bad hire? Dumpster Fire?
Answer honestly with some explanation.
Honestly, I thought it was a "great" hire at the time. Not good, great. Now I am being proven to be wrong, but that's fine, just trying to be honest. First of all we know where we were as a program, we know how Jamie was handled didn't sit so well in the coaching community. Nate Oats wasn't coming. Sean Miller wasn't allowed to be hired. He was blocked and everything that has happened the last few years shows that to have been a smart move. Plus, I see Miller more like his old coach, Paul Evans, they can recruit guys, but their teams are usually a mess. Mark Schmidt didn't move any one's needle. Danny Hurley was the other "guy", but he chose UConn. He hasn't been overwhelming as a success either.
Capel was to me, a great hire. ACC roots, #1 seat next to the Pope. Former HC. Great recruiter. Great personality. A salesman and PR dream as compared to the last two coaches in a city that is fine ignoring basketball. He embraced the city immediately. His recruiting class was a miracle.
But obviously something went amiss quickly. I don't know if he is all candy shell and nothing inside or what. But the hire obviously doesn't look good. But what say you? None of this revisionist history, what were your thoughts?
I just posted something similar. I think fans have a hard time admitting most coaching hires don't work. Either your guy gets fired, takes some lateral move, or is successful enough to jump at the first opportunity for a better job. There aren't many places where coaches stay for 10+ years.
How many unsuccessful women's basketball coaches have there been at Pitt? Even Agnus, who left a complete dumpster fire, was by far the most successful WBB coach we ever had. You just roll the dice and try to execute an intelligent plan, but you're far more likely to fail than succeed.
Not now. Not with the information of the last few years. But then. Alot of you want to fire Lyke because she hired Capel. But at the time.......what did you think? Great hire? Good hire? Meh? Bad hire? Dumpster Fire?
Answer honestly with some explanation.
Honestly, I thought it was a "great" hire at the time. Not good, great. Now I am being proven to be wrong, but that's fine, just trying to be honest. First of all we know where we were as a program, we know how Jamie was handled didn't sit so well in the coaching community. Nate Oats wasn't coming. Sean Miller wasn't allowed to be hired. He was blocked and everything that has happened the last few years shows that to have been a smart move. Plus, I see Miller more like his old coach, Paul Evans, they can recruit guys, but their teams are usually a mess. Mark Schmidt didn't move any one's needle. Danny Hurley was the other "guy", but he chose UConn. He hasn't been overwhelming as a success either.
Capel was to me, a great hire. ACC roots, #1 seat next to the Pope. Former HC. Great recruiter. Great personality. A salesman and PR dream as compared to the last two coaches in a city that is fine ignoring basketball. He embraced the city immediately. His recruiting class was a miracle.
But obviously something went amiss quickly. I don't know if he is all candy shell and nothing inside or what. But the hire obviously doesn't look good. But what say you? None of this revisionist history, what were your thoughts?
If you wait until others start clamoring for their services though, you're running behind. I didn't really have a problem with the Narduzzi extension given the recent history in the football program. I think the length of the extension was absurd coming o
You love him, very bias, be honest , he could lose 10 games and you would be cheering for 5 more years , correct, be honest? Bad news for you , he won't make it past 21 if he sucks like the last few, and you will morn