ADVERTISEMENT

College sports are over for Pitt

Pitt666

Redshirt
Feb 19, 2024
845
427
63
For both football and basketball. That is the reality. We have enough resources to be fringe top 25 in both sports, but short of a lot of luck, that is likely ceiling.

Let’s increase NIL. Well every other program is trying that too and if you look at the CNBC article of program value and revenue, Pitt is top 40s. Not awful, but the disparity between the top 20 and next 20 is striking.

Some of it could be coaching, but back to last point. Pitt put up money for Hurley, but it takes two to tango.

Heather was right to invest in Olympic sports. For now, it was Pitts best shot at a title. But even volleyball. Had a star enter the portal this year.
 
For both football and basketball. That is the reality. We have enough resources to be fringe top 25 in both sports, but short of a lot of luck, that is likely ceiling.

Let’s increase NIL. Well every other program is trying that too and if you look at the CNBC article of program value and revenue, Pitt is top 40s. Not awful, but the disparity between the top 20 and next 20 is striking.

Some of it could be coaching, but back to last point. Pitt put up money for Hurley, but it takes two to tango.

Heather was right to invest in Olympic sports. For now, it was Pitts best shot at a title. But even volleyball. Had a star enter the portal this year.

Heather was dead wrong for the arena. Right to pay Fisher. We might win a volleyball natty but few people truly care although I know that will hurt feelings.

NIL hasnt changed anything for Pitt. We are who we always have been. 7-5ish football (except late 70s/early 80s) and bubblish basketball (except Howland/Dixon 1)
 
  • Like
Reactions: pittizit
I don't want to spit on the rose in your glasses but we haven't been above a fringe Top 25 program in either sport, outside of about 5 years in basketball. It's Pitt has been since 2000 and what they will be unless something drastic changes.

Basketball is a better investment. Football talent has regionally left PA, and even if it were here, PSU is marketed much better and has a much better draw to players.

Just be happy we're not fringe 100 like the early-mid 90s.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TreesHero
I don't want to spit on the rose in your glasses but we haven't been above a fringe Top 25 program in either sport, outside of about 5 years in basketball. It's Pitt has been since 2000 and what they will be unless something drastic changes.

Basketball is a better investment. Football talent has regionally left PA, and even if it were here, PSU is marketed much better and has a much better draw to players.

Just be happy we're not fringe 100 like the early-mid 90s.
It was 10ish years in basketball. Ten glorious years.
 
It was 10ish years in basketball. Ten glorious years.
And during those years our Football team, outside of 1-2 years, was chugging along in the normal 6-6, 7-5 range. The 90s killed Pitt athletics, and unlike other schools that realized it quickly, booster money is the only way to bring it back.

Sad part is, an NCAA death penalty is much easier to manage than a self-imposed "Academic" Death Penalty, because the alumni usually are emboldened by feeling slighted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeftCoastPanther
No, nobody gives a rat's pecker about Olympic sports. That's like a morbidly obese man thinking all he needs to do to look good is style his hair differently, as opposed to losing 400 pounds.
 
For both football and basketball. That is the reality. We have enough resources to be fringe top 25 in both sports, but short of a lot of luck, that is likely ceiling.

Let’s increase NIL. Well every other program is trying that too and if you look at the CNBC article of program value and revenue, Pitt is top 40s. Not awful, but the disparity between the top 20 and next 20 is striking.

Some of it could be coaching, but back to last point. Pitt put up money for Hurley, but it takes two to tango.

Heather was right to invest in Olympic sports. For now, it was Pitts best shot at a title. But even volleyball. Had a star enter the portal this year.
People call it NIL but there are very few real NIL deals being made. It’s straight pay kids to show up. Kenny Pickett had an NIL deal with a car dealership. Allar has a car dealer deal in central PA. All I hear about are kids getting deals calling for money well above what NFL rookies are getting paid on their first contracts. If a kid is a bust does he still get the money? Are kids even going to class??
 
College sports was dead the day NIL came into being. Ohio State paid out an estimated $20 million to its roster, just to give an idea of what it takes to field a championship caliber team in football.

For some smaller schools with plenty of wealthy alumni, such SMU, Duke, UVA, Miami, this is a godsend. And if Stanford really wanted to become serious, they would blow everyone out of the water. Albeit Stanford prefers to maintain its academic standards at some level.

Pitt needs to just remain relevant enough until the system becomes more equitable. The current structure that permits practically unlimited NIL and easy transfers is unsustainable. If there is not any reform in how college players are compensated and permitted to transfer, then Pitt’s in big trouble.
 
Last edited:
For both football and basketball. That is the reality. We have enough resources to be fringe top 25 in both sports, but short of a lot of luck, that is likely ceiling.

Let’s increase NIL. Well every other program is trying that too and if you look at the CNBC article of program value and revenue, Pitt is top 40s. Not awful, but the disparity between the top 20 and next 20 is striking.

Some of it could be coaching, but back to last point. Pitt put up money for Hurley, but it takes two to tango.

Heather was right to invest in Olympic sports. For now, it was Pitts best shot at a title. But even volleyball. Had a star enter the portal this year.
Good then you can stop posting about it get on with your life triple 6 devil boy
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT