Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cuse had 2 players plus Dolejaj. No bench. TCU has more talent. Couldn’t hit shots. Tight.I wish Jamie well. Syracuse clearly had more talent. Jamie has really gotten a lot out of the kids he inherited at TCU. But he’s going to need to get more talent to have the success he had at Pitt.
Cuse had 2 players plus Dolejaj. No bench. TCU has more talent. Couldn’t hit shots. Tight.
I wish Jamie well. Syracuse clearly had more talent. Jamie has really gotten a lot out of the kids he inherited at TCU. But he’s going to need to get more talent to have the success he had at Pitt.
None of the players are the same as 2016. Wtf are you talking about? They were also injury riddled in 16 too. Look it up.Ok you’re right. 2 years ago TCU was the worse team in the Big 12. Syracuse was in the final four.
I wish Jamie well. Syracuse clearly had more talent. Jamie has really gotten a lot out of the kids he inherited at TCU. But he’s going to need to get more talent to have the success he had at Pitt.
Ok you’re right. 2 years ago TCU was the worse team in the Big 12. Syracuse was in the final four.
I think most people would understand Syracuse is a blue blood with elite talent that underachieves in the regular season...but has the talent to turn it on come tourney time
I think most people would understand Syracuse is a blue blood with elite talent that underachieves in the regular season...but has the talent to turn it on come tourney time
He can work his way up to getting upset in the second and third rounds!
I don’t think there’s anything clear about that at all. This is probably the least talented team Boeheim has had in 30 years, starting with the fact that he’s only 6 deep and none of them can shoot.I wish Jamie well. Syracuse clearly had more talent. Jamie has really gotten a lot out of the kids he inherited at TCU. But he’s going to need to get more talent to have the success he had at Pitt.
So that's why Arizona can't get to the final four! Could imagine looking over at that!?The players feed off their coach. The nervous anxiety is dripping off Dixon and Bennett in the NCAA tournament. They are very good coaches during the regular season, but are too tight at tournament time.
Dixon one-and-done again.yeah TCU definitely had the better team I don't know what the hell happened. Syracuse made some really tough shots down the stretch.
I think most people would understand Syracuse is a blue blood with elite talent that underachieves in the regular season...but has the talent to turn it on come tourney time
Both were middle of the pack performers in good conferences.Typically yes.
But anyone who hs watched basketball all year knows that TCU had the better overall team.
My thinking exactly. What happened to the high low post game with screening, cutting, and ball reversal to the open shooters? Dixon was a master of running that stuff while in his best days at Pitt.Is it now illegal to spread the guards, then pass the ball into the high post, then turn and attack a zone with higher percentage shots?
When did it become vogue to have your CENTER set a screen out PAST the 3-point line and against a ZONE defense?
Here's a novel thought...when it is the last minute of the game and your team is behind by 2 or more possesions, push the ball and try to score QUICKLY in transition.
And to think I was already totally frustrated by watching a team all year pass the ball around the perimeter before chucking up a 3 point prayer before the shot clock expired.
TCU's play down the stretch was just as horrendous to watch.
And why do you think their 3 point shooting percentage was so poor against Syracuse? Just a bad night? Bad luck?Both were middle of the pack performers in good conferences.
Tcu has been a live by the 3 die by the team this year.
They shot 17.6% in the game compared to 37% on the season from 3.
And cuse neutralized them on the boards.
That’s the game in two bullet points
Good defense by cuse and they missed plenty of open looksAnd why do you think their 3 point shooting percentage was so poor against Syracuse? Just a bad night? Bad luck?
They were smothered and could barely breathe out there the whole game. Everything was contested. The SU length killed them. And for some reason they abandoned the zone-busting principles that Dixon used to employ so effectively in the old BE.
I doubt Jaylen Fisher would have made much difference in this one. He would have been just as flummoxed by hist first look at that zone as any of his teammates.
Dixon one-and-done again.
Both were middle of the pack performers in good conferences.
Tcu has been a live by the 3 die by the team this year.
They shot 17.6% in the game compared to 37% on the season from 3.
And cuse neutralized them on the boards.
That’s the game in two bullet points
TCU arrow pointing up but it was an egg.
It was a rock fight.Boeheim out-coached him?
Hmmmm... ,another Dixon thread that 's caught your attentionAgree
The arrow began pointing up when they hired the assistant that landed Ben Simmons, an Noi, and Fisher, and Bane.Agree
TCU averaged 82 points a game. IN the end, this reminded me of that last game Dixon coached here when Pitt had the defensively challenged teams with offensive minded guys and struggled to make it into the 40's.
Now I am not sure if Jamie just took the reigns off these guys and they were more a product of the wider open Big 12, or they legitimately paced the game faster.
But at the end, it comes tourney time, and a Dixon team tightened up offensively. Shot poorly. That isn't an accident.
There's almost no arguement against your last line. Something happens to Dixon's teams in the tournament.