Navy-Pitt would be a literally played in Navy's stadium.Navy-Pitt would be interesting. Detroit Bowl against a crap team is not.
It is the 7th ACC bowl... and a tier 2 bowl.... for a reason.
Navy-Pitt would be a literally played in Navy's stadium.Navy-Pitt would be interesting. Detroit Bowl against a crap team is not.
Neither of us are selling allotments to bowl games and filling the coffers of host cities. We are all in the same bucket of teams the bowls only take if they have to , not by choice.Duke doesn't sell out their 30,000 seat home stadium for games.
There's no universe where Duke's football fan support is better than Pitt's. Yes, our fan support is lacking, but it is much better than Duke's.
I went to El Paso last time. Never ever again.We can if Barnes agrees to it. Which, according to the Trib article this morning, it sounds like he just might do.
Barnes apparently believes "driveability" trumps every other consideration..... and that's a serious miscalculation on his part, if it is true.
It would be the first smiley-like move of his tenure.... and I hope he is at least consulting with Narduzzi first.
Has to win the conference or make the playoff for sure.Oh c'mon, now you are being ridiculous.
10-2 and we'd be behind all those other teams. No way. Heck if that's the case we better hope Narduzzi is the next Knute Rockne because it's obvious Pitt has to go undefeated to play in a major bowl.
I dont disagree. My point is there's no justification for Duke to get the Pinstripe over Pitt if Pitt wants the Pinstripe.Neither of us are selling allotments to bowl games and filling the coffers of host cities. We are all in the same bucket of teams the bowls only take if they have to , not by choice.
We can if Barnes agrees to it. Which, according to the Trib article this morning, it sounds like he just might do.
Barnes apparently believes "driveability" trumps every other consideration..... and that's a serious miscalculation on his part, if it is true.
It would be the first smiley-like move of his tenure.... and I hope he is at least consulting with Narduzzi first.
That's not how it works.I dont disagree. My point is there's no justification for Duke to get the Pinstripe over Pitt if Pitt wants the Pinstripe.
If Duke goes to the Pinstripe ahead of Pitt, it is because Barnes foolishly agreed to it.
my point is that if Barnes thinks more Pitt fans will go to Detroit than to any of the tier 1 bowls because it is closer, he is making a serious blunder.So you think he's not even consulting with Narduzzi about it? All this from one blurb in an article?
Why would he consult with Narduzzi.So you think he's not even consulting with Narduzzi about it? All this from one blurb in an article?
I dont disagree. My point is there's no justification for Duke to get the Pinstripe over Pitt if Pitt wants the Pinstripe.
If Duke goes to the Pinstripe ahead of Pitt, it is because Barnes foolishly agreed to it.
That's not how it works.
Bowls pick. Just that simple.
Maybe it's a needed reality check for folks here that Pitt doesn't have some big rep.
Why would he consult with Narduzzi.
We are going to get offered a bowl and we are going to to accept.
Declining isn't an option
The acc bowls get together and hash out who goes where.
I know how it works. And the only way Pitt can drop to a tier 2 bowl is if Barnes and Pitt agree to it. The bowls are specifically put into tiers for a reason. Pitt might not get its best choice for a tier 1 bowl.... but ACC rules state Pitt must get a tier 1 bowl (Music City, Sun, Belk, Pinstripe) unless Pitt agrees to relinquish that and accept a tier 2 bowl.
You are thinking about the old way it was done, which isn't true now. Yes... the bowls pick...but that have a limitation as to which teams they can pick from - and that cant be avoided unless the teams agree to it.
If we're in the MIlitary or Quick Lane or Independence bowl... it is because Barnes agreed to it.
Aren't you one that complained about the day after Xmas? That megabus didn't get you there in time?
A better matchup, yes. But the problem with it is this:Ok, fair enough, but wouldn't Annapolis against navy be a better matchup and easier to get to?
And aside from Unc and fsu who are going first, there are 5 other teams eligible within 1 rule.With the limitation that:
- The 1st ACC option after the NY6 bowls must get the Russell Athletic, unless they decline.
- The 2nd through 5th ACC options get the Belk, Sun, Music City/Taxslayer, and Pinstripe.... unless they decline.
- The 6th through 8th ACC options get the Quick Lane, Military, and Indepence.
Literally, the only way Pitt can go to the Quick Lane, Military, or Independence bowl this year is if Barnes agrees to it. One of the "Tier 1" bowls MUST take Pitt - unless Pitt volunteers to relinquish their standing as a Tier 1 team.
You're simply wrong, Souf.
And aside from Unc and fsu who are going first, there are 5 other teams eligible within 1 rule.
Ncsu to belk is a no brainer for them assuming Unc plays the sun bowl.
Miami , Duke, Pitt, and Louisville .
Keeping Miami in Florida is likely- so taxslayer or Louisville regionally close to Nashville.
So then pinstripe may pick duke... And we've declined nothing but are left back.
Pitt kicked dukes ass and has better fan supportWe have more fan support than Duke or Miami. That's a fact.
No way Duke should get any bowl ahead of Pitt, especially when Pitt has a better record and beat Duke head to head.
Apparently, your understanding was wrong.Playoff: Clemson
Ny6: ND and FSU
Russell: UNC
Tier 1: Miami, Pitt guaranteed
Tier 1: two of Louisville, NCSU, Duke
Tier 2: one of Louisville, NCSU, Duke
Tier 2: VT
There is no within-one-win rule in the ACC anymore.
If Pitt goes to a tier 2 game, it is because Barnes volunteered.
I tried to warn you.We have more fan support than Duke or Miami. That's a fact.
No way Duke should get any bowl ahead of Pitt, especially when Pitt has a better record and beat Duke head to head.