At worst, it creates spots for younger players to move up and play.And history would indicate that finding enough adequate players will be a challenge - to say the least.
Encouraging kids to go is relatively easy. However getting better players hasn’t been quite as easy. He’s landed some decent transfers but they need so much it feels near grim.
If they’re good enough they should be doing that regardless. I know everyone’s all twisted up because of the QB situation the other day. No coach can be 100% but I do believe the coaches play who they feel is best.At worst, it creates spots for younger players to move up and play.
Seniority is in play at every college.If they’re good enough they should be doing that regardless. I know everyone’s all twisted up because of the QB situation the other day. No coach can be 100% but I do believe the coaches play who they feel is best.
100 percent agree. It takes a lot to force his hand on a younger player. It is why I was so shocked when he announced Eli as the starter at the beginning of the season.Seniority is in play at every college.
When the Head Coach is conservative by nature, it is a bigger determinant.
You could see Lynch might be accurate, but his throws were both late and lacked zip.100 percent agree. It takes a lot to force his hand on a younger player. It is why I was so shocked when he announced Eli as the starter at the beginning of the season.
Based on what we saw on Thursday though, Eli had to be the second coming. So far beyond Yarnell at that point that he couldn’t justify not playing him.
Why do I say that? Narduzzi (and maybe Bell) played a walk on statue behind an O-line that they knew was sub-par and was going to need a QB that could move. They left the mobile guy that was clearly the better athlete on the sideline because….?
Yeah, Dugger was going to a make some mistakes (and he did), but if they looked at Lynch and thought “this gives us the best chance to win”, I don’t know how we can ever trust their judgement moving forward when it comes to evaluating who should be playing. Seniority, experience, skill or otherwise.
H2P
You don't keep Renda if you are bringing in a TE. Same with Davis at RB. Brown at OT. Fowler at WR.We have 105 ‘ships next year. We need more quality players, but we don’t need to get rid of anyone based on numbers.
You don't keep Renda if you are bringing in a TE. Same with Davis at RB. Brown at OT. Fowler at WR.
Borders at DE. Yuhas will never play at Pitt.
False. There's going to be no scholarship limit next year, but a 105 roster limit. That number includes all players, scholarship or not. So while you can have 105 scholarships, it doesn't mean schools (including Pitt) can add a bunch of new players without clearing space as most if not all schools are currently well over the 105 number.We have 105 ‘ships next year. We need more quality players, but we don’t need to get rid of anyone based on numbers.
Don't sleep on Yuhas. I'm not saying he's the 2nd coming of JJ Watt much less Chas Alexich but I've seen the kid up close and his work ethic is going to give him a chance if he stays healthy to be a contributor.Yuhas will never play at Pitt.
You should’ve known this last year when Yarnell was the better Qb but he kept running Jurkovic out there and then the other kid Villeux who couldn’t read the field.100 percent agree. It takes a lot to force his hand on a younger player. It is why I was so shocked when he announced Eli as the starter at the beginning of the season.
Based on what we saw on Thursday though, Eli had to be the second coming. So far beyond Yarnell at that point that he couldn’t justify not playing him.
Why do I say that? Narduzzi (and maybe Bell) played a walk on statue behind an O-line that they knew was sub-par and was going to need a QB that could move. They left the mobile guy that was clearly the better athlete on the sideline because….?
Yeah, Dugger was going to a make some mistakes (and he did), but if they looked at Lynch and thought “this gives us the best chance to win”, I don’t know how we can ever trust their judgement moving forward when it comes to evaluating who should be playing. Seniority, experience, skill or otherwise.
H2P
You should’ve known this last year when Yarnell was the better Qb but he kept running Jurkovic out there and then the other kid Villeux who couldn’t read the field.
100 percent agree. It takes a lot to force his hand on a younger player. It is why I was so shocked when he announced Eli as the starter at the beginning of the season.
Based on what we saw on Thursday though, Eli had to be the second coming. So far beyond Yarnell at that point that he couldn’t justify not playing him.
Why do I say that? Narduzzi (and maybe Bell) played a walk on statue behind an O-line that they knew was sub-par and was going to need a QB that could move. They left the mobile guy that was clearly the better athlete on the sideline because….?
Yeah, Dugger was going to a make some mistakes (and he did), but if they looked at Lynch and thought “this gives us the best chance to win”, I don’t know how we can ever trust their judgement moving forward when it comes to evaluating who should be playing. Seniority, experience, skill or otherwise.
H2P
Do you really think that was the coaches mindset? If it is meaningless and that was their plan to play each player one half, then say that leading up to the game. Why the gamesmanship if it is meaningless?Or maybe they looked at it as "this is a freaking meaningless bowl game, let each guy play a half."
Isn't the walk on also a FR?100 percent agree. It takes a lot to force his hand on a younger player. It is why I was so shocked when he announced Eli as the starter at the beginning of the season.
Based on what we saw on Thursday though, Eli had to be the second coming. So far beyond Yarnell at that point that he couldn’t justify not playing him.
Why do I say that? Narduzzi (and maybe Bell) played a walk on statue behind an O-line that they knew was sub-par and was going to need a QB that could move. They left the mobile guy that was clearly the better athlete on the sideline because….?
Yeah, Dugger was going to a make some mistakes (and he did), but if they looked at Lynch and thought “this gives us the best chance to win”, I don’t know how we can ever trust their judgement moving forward when it comes to evaluating who should be playing. Seniority, experience, skill or otherwise.
H2P
Yep, a freshman walk on who got a few drives against Louisville. That appeared to be his qualifications to start the bowl game because it sure wasn’t his running ability or arm.Isn't the walk on also a FR?
Do you really think that was the coaches mindset? If it is meaningless and that was their plan to play each player one half, then say that leading up to the game. Why the gamesmanship if it is meaningless?
Also, if what you are saying was the case, why did Lynch start the second half?
Or maybe they looked at it as "this is a freaking meaningless bowl game, let each guy play a half."
In a meaningless game, Narduzzi lived in his fears for an entire half.
Do you really think that was the coaches mindset? If it is meaningless and that was their plan to play each player one half, then say that leading up to the game. Why the gamesmanship if it is meaningless?
Also, if what you are saying was the case, why did Lynch start the second half?
Again, I am not saying Dugger is some kind of savior (he made mistakes) but he was given a scholarship for a reason. We could all see he is clearly the better athlete of the two options we had.
In a meaningless game, Narduzzi lived in his fears for an entire half.
H2P