Lamont Wade will be taking a Final Official Visit to Pitt

[thebadby2]

The Big 10 teams are more masterful of scheduling than Jamie Dixon getting his good RPI's. The bottom of the Big 10 is horrid. It is great having most of the good team in one division. That makes Wisconsin and Nebraska look just as dominant in the other one. If Michigan didn't have a hurt QB, they would have run the table. Leaving the other 2 teams at 10-2 which is still impressive. MSU had a down year. I don't want to take away what PSU did. They beat who they were supposed to beat + 1 (OSU). However, they beat a lot of soup cans. This year was as close as they will get. Michigan will slap them around next year and OSU will too. (If OSU and PSU played 10 times this year, OSU would have won 9) MSU will rebound. Maryland is starting to get the recruits. Rutgers and Indiana will still give PSU 2 wins a year.

Pitt was 1 win away from the conference championship game. They beat the 2 and 5 team in the country. I don't think Pitt is as far away as PSU. Pitt is close and they need to sell that. If Pitt can get a couple dominant CB's, I think that will get them over the top. Nice stable of DL and more athletic LB's coming up. Keep Canada and we should see more scores like the Duke game than the scores against NC.

We don't even need dominant DBs. Just competent D1 corners and a free safety would have made a big difference this year. As we all know we were just a couple of 3rd and long stops away from 10-2.

Nothing more deflating to a team than giving up a 3rd and 15 in the 4th quarter of a close game.

 

[President Stache]

Yep. Me too. If these nit posers would just come out of the closet, it would probably make them feel better, too. Instead of making their feeble attempts to be "clever".

Well, I can see why they would be embarrassed to call themselves fans of pennst.

 

[President Stache]

Some of you are impossible.

I responded to a post that said it was a "historical down year" for the Big 10. That just isn't true. It was a great year for the Big 10 and the Big 10 East IS the hottest thing in college football right now. As strong as tOSU & Michigan are, another team represented the East in the B1G Championship game this year & last. That's pretty darn strong.

The SEC West is currently Bama's bitch.

Dealing in reality doesn't mean Im a Nitter. My original comment in this thread defended Narduzzi's secondary coaching. I want Wade in a Pitt uniform next year. Pitt is on the rise and he would be successful here imo. That doesn't mean I have to make myself look stupid and agree with opinions that are way out in left field. Hell, Paul Finebaum will tell you the Big 10 is better than the SEC right now and he is a total SEC sheep.

Wow... can you imagine a "great year" for the ACC being ranked 4th among all confernces by all the computers? We would be going apesh*t.

I think what TD is saying is the Big 10 is always so sucky and so bad, that this year, pulling off a #4 or #3 ranking is very, very good for them. Think MAC... if they were suddenly the #4 conference, we would be calling that a "great season" also. So, you guys think TD is a nitter and total douchebag, but really, he is greatly insulting the Big10

Also, everyone is Alabama's bitch, including ped state prior to sanctions, as evidence of the 51-14 thumping in 2010-2011.

 

[TD_6082]

Wow... can you imagine a "great year" for the ACC being ranked 4th among all confernces by all the computers? We would be going apesh*t.

I think what TD is saying is the Big 10 is always so sucky and so bad, that this year, pulling off a #4 or #3 ranking is very, very good for them. Think MAC... if they were suddenly the #4 conference, we would be calling that a "great season" also. So, you guys think TD is a nitter and total douchebag, but really, he is greatly insulting the Big10

Also, everyone is Alabama's bitch, including ped state prior to sanctions, as evidence of the 51-14 thumping in 2010-2011.

Holy crap. Saying the Big Ten had a great year isn't a slight on Pitt, nor is it meant to prop up PSU.

I think the playoffs and the NY6 bowls are a better indicator of conference strength than a computer poll. Maybe thats just me.

I remember those games and I was glad to see Bama kick their ass.

 

[President Stache]

Holy crap. Saying the Big Ten had a great year isn't a slight on Pitt, nor is it meant to prop up PSU.

I think the playoffs and the NY6 bowls are a better indicator of conference strength than a computer poll. Maybe thats just me.

I remember those games and I was glad to see Bama kick their ass.

I didnt say it was, I was agreeing that this year that the big 10 was ranked #3 or #4 out of conferences depending on which model you look at is extraordinary and proves they are about at MAC level for what is expected, that is all.

They always had new year day bowls, not sure what you mean there, they were 2-4 last year in bowl games NYE-Jan 2, with ... OF COURSE... only getting wins by ohio state and Michigan, year before that 3-3, before that 2-4 and in 2012 was 1-4.

So, the metric is rather low, but we shall see if they improve upon that this year. I think they should.

 

[ncyajleel]

LSU was number 5 preseason this year. Notre Dame was in the top 10. I wouldn't say they are any closer than Pitt. Penn State's schedule will be more difficult and Pitt's will be easier. Basing your decision on where you think a team will be ranked would be kind of dumb.

My point is that he's thinking about how he'll spend his next three years. Playing for national championships is a big drawing point now that PSU had all the pieces fall in the right spots. PSU being ranked 5th with a very young team shows that they're closer to contending than Pitt is, and unfortunately kind of diminishes the win against PSU since they rebounded so nicely.

 

[ncyajleel]

How is the Big Ten the best conference? Three top ten teams does not make an entire conference great, it just means they have three good teams.

ACC has 8 teams with winning records and only 3 with losing records, 10 bowl eligible teams.
BIG has 7 teams with winning records and 4 with losing records, 10 bowl eligible teams.
In comparison the Big 12 was 4-4-2, the PAC was 6-6, and the SEC was 9-3-2.

Some of you are impossible.

I responded to a post that said it was a "historical down year" for the Big 10. That just isn't true. It was a great year for the Big 10 and the Big 10 East IS the hottest thing in college football right now. As strong as tOSU & Michigan are, another team represented the East in the B1G Championship game this year & last. That's pretty darn strong.

The SEC West is currently Bama's bitch.

Dealing in reality doesn't mean Im a Nitter. My original comment in this thread defended Narduzzi's secondary coaching. I want Wade in a Pitt uniform next year. Pitt is on the rise and he would be successful here imo. That doesn't mean I have to make myself look stupid and agree with opinions that are way out in left field. Hell, Paul Finebaum will tell you the Big 10 is better than the SEC right now and he is a total SEC sheep.

 

[President Stache]

My point is that he's thinking about how he'll spend his next three years. Playing for national championships is a big drawing point now that PSU had all the pieces fall in the right spots. PSU being ranked 5th with a very young team shows that they're closer to contending than Pitt is, and unfortunately kind of diminishes the win against PSU since they rebounded so nicely.

Wow... I mean, congrats on your lucky season and all, but come on... There is no way you look at this season and can come to the conclusion that psu is closer to a national championship than Pitt is...

1. I mean, they WON the big 10 this year, and still arent in the championship
2. Pitt BEAT THEM this year, and wasnt a fluke, we destroyed both lines of scrimmage.
3. Pitt lost 3 games by 11 points, win 2 of them, and we were ranked ahead of ped
4. Our schedule was TOUGH, and we still were 8-4. three years out it is ped state, Ohio and Delaware in OCC... pretty primed for a run there, and no fsu or clemson.
5. 3 years out MacVittie will be an upperclassmen, will have solid D as well.

Sure, ped state has their wimpy schedule, and good players too. But if we win the ACC, we will need to win the ACC championship and we will be in... pedst already proved that isnt the case for them.

 

[kalake]

Wow... I mean, congrats on your lucky season and all, but come on... There is no way you look at this season and can come to the conclusion that psu is closer to a national championship than Pitt is...

1. I mean, they WON the big 10 this year, and still arent in the championship
2. Pitt BEAT THEM this year, and wasnt a fluke, we destroyed both lines of scrimmage.
3. Pitt lost 3 games by 11 points, win 2 of them, and we were ranked ahead of ped
4. Our schedule was TOUGH, and we still were 8-4. three years out it is ped state, Ohio and Delaware in OCC... pretty primed for a run there, and no fsu or clemson.
5. 3 years out MacVittie will be an upperclassmen, will have solid D as well.

Sure, ped state has their wimpy schedule, and good players too. But if we win the ACC, we will need to win the ACC championship and we will be in... pedst already proved that isnt the case for them.

Wish I never posted at all. I'm not speaking about my own personal views. I'm speaking based off of Lamont's father and how he saw the season. If you paid for the premium board you'd know by now that everything I said lines up exactly with Lamont's fathers words on what he thinks about PSU this season. I am not a PSU fan, I haven't posted on their forum once. You don't have to prove any of the above points to me, rather the staff needs to prove that to Lamont and his father. Stop mistaking me for a PSU fan just because what I said isn't what you want to hear. We had two huge wins, but they were lost in the media after OSU got upset by PSU, and the Clemson game didn't get as much hype as it should've because #3 and #4 lost on the same day that we beat Clemson.


I figured once everyone was informed from the article that Ryan Donnelly posted last night with quotes from Lamont's father about what he likes about each of the schools in Lamont's top 5, that I wouldn't still be getting attacked for what I said, but I was wrong. It is blatantly clear that Pitt has some serious ground to make up on this OV and following in house visit. I will not be responding anymore about this. Trying to convince fellow pitt fans to see things without their pitt glasses on is near impossible.

 

[TD_6082]

How is the Big Ten the best conference? Three top ten teams does not make an entire conference great, it just means they have three good teams.

ACC has 8 teams with winning records and only 3 with losing records, 10 bowl eligible teams.
BIG has 7 teams with winning records and 4 with losing records, 10 bowl eligible teams.
In comparison the Big 12 was 4-4-2, the PAC was 6-6, and the SEC was 9-3-2.

You can argue all day whether it is or isn't. However, the perception now is that the Big 10 is the best conference. You have to have your head in the sand to think otherwise.

https://www.google.com/amp/www.cbss...t-conference/amp/?client=ms-android-sprint-us

 

[CaptainSidneyReilly]

5-star CB Lamont Wade – The nation’s No. 3 cornerback and No. 17 overall player will be taking his decision public on Dec. 17 . Wade is deciding between Penn State, Pitt, Tennessee, UCLA and West Virginia, but it appears as though the Nittany Lions have the upper hand.
LINK:
https://campusinsiders.com/news/recruiting-dead-period-storylines-that-matter-12-05-2016/

 

[Jpripper88]

Wish I never posted at all. I'm not speaking about my own personal views. I'm speaking based off of Lamont's father and how he saw the season. If you paid for the premium board you'd know by now that everything I said lines up exactly with Lamont's fathers words on what he thinks about PSU this season. I am not a PSU fan, I haven't posted on their forum once. You don't have to prove any of the above points to me, rather the staff needs to prove that to Lamont and his father. Stop mistaking me for a PSU fan just because what I said isn't what you want to hear. We had two huge wins, but they were lost in the media after OSU got upset by PSU, and the Clemson game didn't get as much hype as it should've because #3 and #4 lost on the same day that we beat Clemson.


I figured once everyone was informed from the article that Ryan Donnelly posted last night with quotes from Lamont's father about what he likes about each of the schools in Lamont's top 5, that I wouldn't still be getting attacked for what I said, but I was wrong. It is blatantly clear that Pitt has some serious ground to make up on this OV and following in house visit. I will not be responding anymore about this. Trying to convince fellow pitt fans to see things without their pitt glasses on is near impossible.

Some people on here are insane and know nothing else.

 

[steelhead52]

Based on one year? Good gracious, PSU was getting smacked around by Temple last year. I see what you're saying, but they are no closer to winning a national championship than PITT is at this point. They will always play second fiddle to OSU and UM in their division of the BIG, in a down year. Michigan State, who was incredibly young this year will be back to their old ways soon enough.

I'm not taking anything away from PSU as they took care of most of their business, but having the schedule fall into place in a historically down year for the BIG is not going to be the norm moving forward.

A down year in the Big 10? They won the Big 10 in a year where 4 Big 10 teams are ranked in the top 8 and 3 from their division are ranked in the top 6. I don't want to see the Big 10 in an up year. Plus 65% of their team is sophomore or younger. They have 10 of 11 back on offense...I not sure what your looking at. Second fiddle? They beat OSU and both teams that beat Michigan. That all said, Pitt was only a few points away from having a 10 win season themselves, so maybe not as far away as thought by many.

 

[raleighpanther]

I think it was a great year for the B1G. tOSU is in the playoffs and the NY6 bowls are full of B1G teams. PSU was young this year too. I agree that MSU will be better in the future, but I don't think PSU's success is a fluke either.

The Big 10 East has, at least for now, replaced SEC West as the epicenter of college football.

This is utter nonsense.

First of all, Rutgers, MD, Indiana are perennial trash. And this year, MSU performed at their level. Thus, PSU who is much improved this year, was able to coast to a one loss conference record by having a great 4th Q against OSU, and winning the second tiebreaker to get into the championship.

The ACC beat the SEC this year, and the ACC has nice balance, something the B10 lacks.

 

[TD_6082]

https://www.google.com/amp/www.si.c...all-revival?amp=1?client=ms-android-sprint-us

 

[TD_6082]

https://www.google.com/amp/syndicat...football.amp.html?client=ms-android-sprint-us

 

[TD_6082]

http://collegefootballplayoff.com/content/ranking/2016

3 teams in the Top 6. 4 in the Top 8. Nuff said.

 

[SeasonedOne]

"Most exciting" and B1G in the same sentence is funny.

Here's the B1G east in a nutshell....cakewalk, P5 OOC (maybe), cakewalk, cakewalk,cakewalk, annual asskicking, cakewalk,cakewalk, hope for devine intervention, cakewalk, cakewalk, cakewalk, followed by disappointment if you are not tO$U or Mich.

NAILED IT!!!

 

[SeasonedOne]

The Big 10 had 4 teams finish with 3 wins or less. Think about that for a while fanboy. And that doesn't even include highly average teams like Indiana or Maryland.

Bwahahhahahah! Truf!! I almost choked on my coffee reading this! H2P!!

 

[President Stache]

Wish I never posted at all. I'm not speaking about my own personal views. I'm speaking based off of Lamont's father and how he saw the season. If you paid for the premium board you'd know by now that everything I said lines up exactly with Lamont's fathers words on what he thinks about PSU this season. I am not a PSU fan, I haven't posted on their forum once. You don't have to prove any of the above points to me, rather the staff needs to prove that to Lamont and his father. Stop mistaking me for a PSU fan just because what I said isn't what you want to hear. We had two huge wins, but they were lost in the media after OSU got upset by PSU, and the Clemson game didn't get as much hype as it should've because #3 and #4 lost on the same day that we beat Clemson.


I figured once everyone was informed from the article that Ryan Donnelly posted last night with quotes from Lamont's father about what he likes about each of the schools in Lamont's top 5, that I wouldn't still be getting attacked for what I said, but I was wrong. It is blatantly clear that Pitt has some serious ground to make up on this OV and following in house visit. I will not be responding anymore about this. Trying to convince fellow pitt fans to see things without their pitt glasses on is near impossible.

Well... you write this and that is all fine and dandy, but as jpripper said, you might be insane. I was referring to this you wrote:

"My point is that he's thinking about how he'll spend his next three years. Playing for national championships is a big drawing point now that PSU had all the pieces fall in the right spots. PSU being ranked 5th with a very young team shows that they're closer to contending than Pitt is, and unfortunately kind of diminishes the win against PSU since they rebounded so nicely."

You never once said 'his father' and you exactly said 'my point'. You didnt mention anyone else's comments or any article. So.... you are completely full of poo dude. You are now covering up for this inane post. I simply called you out on this post.

I personally, as I said before, think Wade isnt going to Pitt, but I certainly hope he does. But if he didnt, it certainly isnt because PSU is closer to contending than Pitt is, that just isnt true at all.

Maybe you are a Pitt fan, I dont know, I dont care really, I just was debating your post. Just reading this post you wrote, which is all I did, you, to me, seemed like a ped state fan, if you arent, then, I apologize for insulting you.

 

[9nationalchampionships]

Decision coming soon........I am thinking PITT w/ the Clairton Panthers over the years he would be foolish not to follow their footsteps to the NFL

 

[kalake]

Decision coming soon........I am thinking PITT w/ the Clairton Panthers over the years he would be foolish not to follow their footsteps to the NFL

We'll see. He tweeted that he was going to see UCLA play this weekend. They play Michigan at home, so the thought going around now is that Wade isn't even visiting this weekend anymore. (Most people thinking that's because he already picked PSU so he might as well get a free vacation to California).

 

[9nationalchampionships]

Go back to your team's board!

We'll see. He tweeted that he was going to see UCLA play this weekend. They play Michigan at home, so the thought going around now is that Wade isn't even visiting this weekend anymore. (Most people thinking that's because he already picked PSU so he might as well get a free vacation to California).

 

[kalake]

Go back to your team's board!

Pay for the Fifth and Forbes message board and see for yourself. You are so ignorant.

 

[revampedpanthers]

We don't even need dominant DBs. Just competent D1 corners and a free safety would have made a big difference this year. As we all know we were just a couple of 3rd and long stops away from 10-2.

Nothing more deflating to a team than giving up a 3rd and 15 in the 4th quarter of a close game.

I will add if hendrix is healthy Pitt likely makes some of those stops by pressure or sack.

 

[steel_curtain]

I would wait for bowl season to play out first. The last time the big ten tried to flex as best confetence was 2006 with number 1 Ohio state and number 2 Michigan. Ohio State was then annihilated by Florida in a complete laugher national title game and USC blew Michigan right off the field in 2 of the biggest laughing embarrassments in big ten bowl history. I don't think the big ten teams will lose by 40 again, but I'm glad to watch Clemson and Florida State play Ohio State and Michigan. Michigan better find a qb or the one they do have better not be injured.

 

[CaptainSidneyReilly]

I would wait for bowl season to play out first. The last time the big ten tried to flex as best confetence was 2006 with number 1 Ohio state and number 2 Michigan. Ohio State was then annihilated by Florida in a complete laugher national title game and USC blew Michigan right off the field in 2 of the biggest laughing embarrassments in big ten bowl history. I don't think the big ten teams will lose by 40 again, but I'm glad to watch Clemson and Florida State play Ohio State and Michigan. Michigan better find a qb or the one they do have better not be injured.

Exactly, also ESPN Player's Post-Awards, Bowls play out and the FINAL AP-CP RANKINGS after that there will be Dozens of Sports Websites making comparisons and of course the Conference that Wins the NCS will say we are the Best again!

Wait for Bowl results.....let it play out, then debate it and some games will be won by 1 an 2 points and cause more debates? Why CFB is so great!

 

[VAPITTALUM]

A down year in the Big 10? They won the Big 10 in a year where 4 Big 10 teams are ranked in the top 8 and 3 from their division are ranked in the top 6. I don't want to see the Big 10 in an up year. Plus 65% of their team is sophomore or younger. They have 10 of 11 back on offense...I not sure what your looking at. Second fiddle? They beat OSU and both teams that beat Michigan. That all said, Pitt was only a few points away from having a 10 win season themselves, so maybe not as far away as thought by many.

Let's dissect this a bit:

1. 4 BIG teams are ranked in the Top 8, which is an excellent accomplishment, however, when you distill things down a bit you understand just how these teams (not named OSU were able to accomplish these lofty rankings.

• Wisconsin played 10 games against teams with a combined record of 55-64. The 3 excellent teams they played in PSU, OSU, and UM all resulted in losses; they were close losses, but still losses. Not exactly a tough sltate to reach 10 wins.
• Penn State was similar to Wisconsin, except they lost to a PITT team whom I would consider above average rather than excellent. They balanced that loss with an excellent win against OSU. Overall, in their games against everyone outside of OSU, Wisconsin, and UM (remember we're focusing on the Top 4 teams who are considered excellent?) they were faced with opponents with a combined record of 57-64.
• Michigan balanced their tough loss against Iowa (who lost to an FCS opponent) with a solid win against Colorado in the OOC. Overall, in their games against opponents not named PSU, OSU, or Wisconsin, they faced opponents with a combined record of 50-60.
• The takeaway: The Top 4 teams in the BIG, while very good, were able to feast on 9-10 opponents who were, for the most part, well below average. To their credit, these teams were able to take care of business against lesser opponents, while also bolstering their resumes with a down year from the BIG, as it related to conference-wide strength.

2. Yes, PSU is still playing second fiddle to UM and OSU. If they weren't, they would have received an invite to the CFB Playoffs after winning the BIG title.

 

[TD_6082]

Michigan & Ohio State are college football royalty. Those two are programs that are always going to get media attention whether they win or lose. That isn't why they weren't invited to the playoffs. The reason is that tOSU clearly had a better resume and a better overall body of work. Had PSU beaten Pitt & played Michigan closer, I think its almost a certainty that they would be in, probably over Washington. A win over Pitt might have been enough to tip the scales.

There is no bias or hidden agenda. tOSU was simply more deserving under the current criteria.

 

[CaptainSidneyReilly]

"TD_6082, post: 1703374, member: 510"]Michigan & Ohio State are college football royalty. Those two are programs that are always going to get media attention whether they win or lose. That isn't why they weren't invited to the playoffs. The reason is that tOSU clearly had a better resume and a better overall body of work. Had PSU beaten Pitt & played Michigan closer, I think its almost a certainty that they would be in, probably over Washington. A win over Pitt might have been enough to tip the scales.

There is no bias or hidden agenda. tOSU was simply more deserving under the current criteria.[/QUOTE]
Ditto, and well said!

 

[Teh Teh]

Pay for the Fifth and Forbes message board and see for yourself. You are so ignorant.

Mmmm looks pretty obvious you're a flamer from the posts on here

 

[VAPITTALUM]

Michigan & Ohio State are college football royalty. Those two are programs that are always going to get media attention whether they win or lose. That isn't why they weren't invited to the playoffs. The reason is that tOSU clearly had a better resume and a better overall body of work. Had PSU beaten Pitt & played Michigan closer, I think its almost a certainty that they would be in, probably over Washington. A win over Pitt might have been enough to tip the scales.

There is no bias or hidden agenda. tOSU was simply more deserving under the current criteria.

The example you just provided is more of a bias toward the BIG vs. the PAC 12, rather than the discussion of OSU vs. PSU. But a fair enough assumption regarding the OOC schedule OSU played vs. PSU's OOC schedule and overall record. I guess we'll have to wait and see if both teams finish with the same record one year, which team is invited to what bowl.

 

[kalake]

Mmmm looks pretty obvious you're a flamer from the posts on here

Very classy. I'm not going to argue with guys 20 years older than me that won't spend $10 dollars to actually learn information about recruiting. This is why I was hesitant to post anything to begin with. Pitt fans like you are total dumbasses who attack anyone that isn't "Pro-Pitt" about something.

 

[9nationalchampionships]

Must be a cult member because he can't understand the situation. Being a paid member does not mean you are not a troll! Geeeese

So if I am 32 that makes you 12.....does mommy know you were in her purse?

Very classy. I'm not going to argue with guys 20 years older than me that won't spend $10 dollars to actually learn information about recruiting. This is why I was hesitant to post anything to begin with. Pitt fans like you are total dumbasses who attack anyone that isn't "Pro-Pitt" about something.

 

[kalake]

Must be a cult member because he can't understand the situation. Being a paid member does not mean you are not a troll! Geeeese

Go back and read my posts again. I didn't bash Pitt once. I simply said that our own insiders have given PSU the edge over Pitt from their point of view. Lamont Wade's father also reinforces that belief with his comments on why his son would go to Pitt or PSU. It's obvious his father is very pro-PSU. I said from the start that Pitt has an up hill battle. There's now a rumor that he's going to UCLA this weekend instead of going to the OV at Pitt. I realize it's not what anyone wants to hear, but that doesn't make me a fan of another team just because I'm stating facts, the UCLA rumor isn't official yet, but I'm sure more will come out on that later today. Not like you'll know though.

 

[9nationalchampionships]

Okay if you are not a troll I apologize. You do have a funny way of wording things if you truly are a Panther fan!

Go back and read my posts again. I didn't bash Pitt once. I simply said that our own insiders have given PSU the edge over Pitt from their point of view. Lamont Wade's father also reinforces that belief with his comments on why his son would go to Pitt or PSU. It's obvious his father is very pro-PSU. I said from the start that Pitt has an up hill battle. There's now a rumor that he's going to UCLA this weekend instead of going to the OV at Pitt. I realize it's not what anyone wants to hear, but that doesn't make me a fan of another team just because I'm stating facts, the UCLA rumor isn't official yet, but I'm sure more will come out on that later today. Not like you'll know though.

 

[steel_curtain]

Go back and read my posts again. I didn't bash Pitt once. I simply said that our own insiders have given PSU the edge over Pitt from their point of view. Lamont Wade's father also reinforces that belief with his comments on why his son would go to Pitt or PSU. It's obvious his father is very pro-PSU. I said from the start that Pitt has an up hill battle. There's now a rumor that he's going to UCLA this weekend instead of going to the OV at Pitt. I realize it's not what anyone wants to hear, but that doesn't make me a fan of another team just because I'm stating facts, the UCLA rumor isn't official yet, but I'm sure more will come out on that later today. Not like you'll know though.

-His old man doesnt like Pitt. Because his ole man doesnt like Pitt fans. His old man is also a nobody. Robert Foster had an NFL dream too. His ole man destroyed it. Hey Foster, how is the bench this year? Because your ole man is now a cheerleader for alabama and you suck.

 

[LuvDaLions]

Regarding the "Visiting UCLA/Pitt" this weekend, isn't he playing in the state championship game this weekend? It certainly would make it hard to get out to LA. I could see an official to Pitt, but not sure how UCLA would fit into the time frame.

 

[kalake]

Okay if you are not a troll I apologize. You do have a funny way of wording things if you truly are a Panther fan!

Honestly I've been more tuned into the Wade fiasco than a lot of people recently. I would absolutely love for him to go to Pitt but it seems that Wade's OV with PSU really swayed things, and Pitt won't really get that chance if he isn't there this weekend. They think PSU has a better education, which is completely false. Not to discredit Narduzzi, I just think the Wade family is set on PSU and isn't really giving him a fair chance if they visit UCLA instead of Pitt.

 

[9nationalchampionships]

Ohhh he wants to cut grass or be a forest ranger! Sure hope he does not get hurt because he will have to go under the knife with a Vet up in Dairy U.

Honestly I've been more tuned into the Wade fiasco than a lot of people recently. I would absolutely love for him to go to Pitt but it seems that Wade's OV with PSU really swayed things, and Pitt won't really get that chance if he isn't there this weekend. They think PSU has a better education, which is completely false. Not to discredit Narduzzi, I just think the Wade family is set on PSU and isn't really giving him a fair chance if they visit UCLA instead of Pitt.