So he was taken out after being in the game for 8:37. Included in the 8:37 was
- the under 16 TV timeout
- the under 12 TV timeout
- the Louisville full TV timeout with 8:16 left.
So he had *THREE* rests of at least 2 minutes.
This isn't soccer with a continuous running clock and no rests. He played 8 and a half minutes and had at least 6 minutes of rest during that time. If you want to argue that he couldn't have stayed in and "needed a blow", I will disagree every time.
Actually I didn't say that he needed a blow. I said that perhaps he needed one. I admit that there are some things that I don't know, and that is one of them.
However, one does wonder with the kind of logic you are exhibiting here why it is that you don't advocate the five best players playing 40 minutes per game every game. I mean after all, those guys get four TV timeouts in the first half and then five more in the second half. And they also get to take a break whenever either team uses one of their three 30 second timeouts or their one 60 second time out. With all those timeouts it's a wonder that anyone ever needs a break.