ADVERTISEMENT

Ok. Can we bring back the Locker Room forum now?

Here’s the one fly in the ointment. While I really like what he’s doing so far his success or failure is tied to what Congress actually does with the budget process. I don’t trust the uniparty. They’ve all been benefitting from the waste and corruption (Rs and Ds). You can see already the Rs are kicking budget cuts down the road to 26. So it’s more of the same bullshit

I agree, pittbb. Congress holds the cards and I don't trust any of them to do what the American people want them to do.
 
I agree, pittbb. Congress holds the cards and I don't trust any of them to do what the American people want them to do.
Just gotta hope Trump has the receipts on their corruption to be able to twist their arms to actually do something. But this first budget process is hugely disappointing so far

I will say that Lady G has come around on Ukraine so I suppose there is some hope But there is a long way to go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fk_Pitt
Just gotta hope Trump has the receipts on their corruption to be able to twist their arms to actually do something. But this first budget process is hugely disappointing so far

I will say that Lady G has come around on Ukraine so I suppose there is some hope But there is a long way to go.

All of this....the economy, Ukraine/Russia war, inflation, the border, the budget, energy...will take time. There is indeed a long way to go. But Trump surely got a lot done already. As long as Congress gets a spine and does the right thing now.
 
All of this....the economy, Ukraine/Russia war, inflation, the border, the budget, energy...will take time. There is indeed a long way to go. But Trump surely got a lot done already. As long as Congress gets a spine and does the right thing now.
Yup great start. But it’s not how you start it’s how you finish
 
  • Like
Reactions: HailToPitt1985
hcjwzu4s5W4n.jpeg

A true patriot
 
hcjwzu4s5W4n.jpeg

A true patriot

This is so profound.

Regarding the Russia/Ukraine war, I want one lib on here to show me one line of text in the Constitution that outlines or suggests that we need to aid foreign nations in any way, including aiding them monetarily or militarily in a war. Or just aiding foreign nations at all. There isn't one.

Follow the law of the land....the Constitution and only the Constitution. If we did that, over 90% of our problems would disappear.
 
This is so profound.

Regarding the Russia/Ukraine war, I want one lib on here to show me one line of text in the Constitution that outlines or suggests that we need to aid foreign nations in any way, including aiding them monetarily or militarily in a war. Or just aiding foreign nations at all. There isn't one.

Follow the law of the land....the Constitution and only the Constitution. If we did that, over 90% of our problems would disappear.
Agreed and that would include muh greatest ally who is committing genocide in Gaza. But as we all know every shit bag in DC on both sides of the aisle is owned by Israel
 
I saw some thread earlier, I think it was started by SMF, about the stock market tanking and the world coming to an end, all because of Trump's policies. The market on que is now recovering intraday and of course, the panic from the left is unfounded and off base. It may not maintain the recovery into the close, but it's not tanking. It isn't crashing and we'll be fine. This is a buy and hold period.

I really am amused by the lack of intelligence from the left, especially with issues of finance, the markets, the economy.
 
I saw some thread earlier, I think it was started by SMF, about the stock market tanking and the world coming to an end, all because of Trump's policies. The market on que is now recovering intraday and of course, the panic from the left is unfounded and off base. It may not maintain the recovery into the close, but it's not tanking. It isn't crashing and we'll be fine. This is a buy and hold period.

I really am amused by the lack of intelligence from the left, especially with issues of finance, the markets, the economy.

 
What is wrong with Dems all voting the bill down to protect women sports and not allow men to play in women's sports????? This is a bill protecting women's rights, plain and simple. The Dems came out and said publicly they are for women's rights and said it very loudly in the past. And now they're totally against women's rights. Do these morons even know what they stand for?

This is why they lost the election so badly and will continue to lose elections badly. Dems are against everything the American people are for and are for everything the American people are against.
What it is....Trump supports it. So therefore, Democrats must oppose it. Trump should propose raising taxes on the top 5% of earners and watch the Dems become confused and vote against it. It's amazing in my lifetime to see the Left become antisemitic, pro war and now anti women's rights.
 
It seems the Dems refuse to vote for their constituencies and for the will of the people. They'd rather vote for their own political interests, their constituencies be damned. They want to be voted out of office. And that's what every one of those who voted against this bill should have happen. It's about women's rights and right and wrong.
With trans people making up less than 1% of the population, what political interest do they have? Not arguing with you, but it doesn't seem like a hill worth dying for.
 
What it is....Trump supports it. So therefore, Democrats must oppose it. Trump should propose raising taxes on the top 5% of earners and watch the Dems become confused and vote against it. It's amazing in my lifetime to see the Left become antisemitic, pro war and now anti women's rights.

LOL! The left just keeps morphing to a totally different direction than what the people want and need. They are so out of touch with their constituents.
 
With trans people making up less than 1% of the population, what political interest do they have? Not arguing with you, but it doesn't seem like a hill worth dying for.

I was focusing more on the women's rights thing which the Dems and the left were so in favor of just a few years ago, and now they're against women's rights. The trans thing is a distraction they want people to use against Trump. It is meaningless.
 
hcjwzu4s5W4n.jpeg

A true patriot
Yeah well I am for the basic tenets of the constitution the world is a much different place now than when it was written. For example "no gun control". It was different when "guns" were limited to single shot powder muskets and a single cannon ball. Now you don't want tanks, F35 fighters and 50 caliber machine guns in the hands of private citizens now do you? What really should have happened, and while they were against, they immediately ran on it...but the elimination of parties. Imagine the savings on primaries and forcing people to actually campaign on the wants and needs of their constituents??
 
Some profit taking going into the close, but no market tanking and no need to panic, unless you're a Dem. The market is showing strength with decent volume.
 
What is wrong with Dems all voting the bill down to protect women sports and not allow men to play in women's sports????? This is a bill protecting women's rights, plain and simple. The Dems came out and said publicly they are for women's rights and said it very loudly in the past. And now they're totally against women's rights. Do these morons even know what they stand for?

This is why they lost the election so badly and will continue to lose elections badly. Dems are against everything the American people are for and are for everything the American people are against.
260 Dems in Congress and 258 of them voted against it.

Can someone make this make sense?

This is an 80% issue. Maybe even higher. And the Dems in Congress are siding with the 20% freaks.

What are we even doing here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HailToPitt1985
Here’s the one fly in the ointment. While I really like what he’s doing so far his success or failure is tied to what Congress actually does with the budget process. I don’t trust the uniparty. They’ve all been benefitting from the waste and corruption (Rs and Ds). You can see already the Rs are kicking budget cuts down the road to 26. So it’s more of the same bullshit
Name me one person in congress with a higher approval rating than Trump. These guys are going to FAFO.
 
260 Dems in Congress and 258 of them voted against it.

Can someone make this make sense?

This is an 80% issue. Maybe even higher. And the Dems in Congress are siding with the 20% freaks.

What are we even doing here.

It's closer to 90% or more. People are in favor of women's rights. The left and the Dems are using the trans thing as a distraction while obviously they've changed their position on women's rights and are now against it. Trans is insignificant, less than 1% of the population. And they need mental health help. It's the bigger issue that the Dems are totally against....women's rights. Dems are completely out of touch with their constituencies and reality.
 
That’s funny. That South Park athlete is like a typical liberal woman. She’s all for men in womens sports, until faced with it directly.

Just like the liberals in Martha’s Vineyard who put those illegals on a plane faster than pavel Bure pouncing on a loose puck in the neutral zone.

Or just like Souf being faced with little Souf going off to fight a war in Ukraine. Those blue and yellow flags would be off his lawn faster than an Alex Ovechkin one timer from the left circle.
 
I do remember that talk by the Dems and the media. And if things do go south in the next 4 years as they did under Biden, it would be a toss-up as to who would win.

I think, however, the difference is the Dems have no one competent to run for president in the next 4 years and probably for longer. At least the GOP has multiple people with functioning brains that can run for president. If Trump can clean up the Biden Harris mess and Vance makes more of a name for himself, it won't be a contest in 2028.
Well I would beg to disagree. Trump could denigrate anyone and it could stick. There isn’t anyone Republicans would run who could do same thing. Some tried and it made them look goofy at best.

The Democrats could run a guy like Mark Kelly from Arizona and he would come across as a decent person.

And remember this is in four years where the economy is suspect. So Vance runs and everyone points at him as part of the problem for four years. Rubio tries and the dem shows that Homer Simpson couch picture of him during Zelenskyy affair.

And frankly most other people that ran previously the Dems could just study what Trump said about each of them and bring it up again.
 
I saw some thread earlier, I think it was started by SMF, about the stock market tanking and the world coming to an end, all because of Trump's policies. The market on que is now recovering intraday and of course, the panic from the left is unfounded and off base. It may not maintain the recovery into the close, but it's not tanking. It isn't crashing and we'll be fine. This is a buy and hold period.

I really am amused by the lack of intelligence from the left, especially with issues of finance, the markets, the economy.

The world isn’t ending. But it’s not accurate to say that 1300 down over two days is “recovering on queue”.

Of course “we’ll be fine” long term. But some extremely tough things for some businesses right now as a result of some decisions.
 
I saw some thread earlier, I think it was started by SMF, about the stock market tanking and the world coming to an end, all because of Trump's policies. The market on que is now recovering intraday and of course, the panic from the left is unfounded and off base. It may not maintain the recovery into the close, but it's not tanking. It isn't crashing and we'll be fine. This is a buy and hold period.

I really am amused by the lack of intelligence from the left, especially with issues of finance, the markets, the economy.

wrong a mundo, close pretty much closed at the low point for the day. I'm not panicking as market swings have happened since time immemorium and is pretty pointless to watch everyday. But to say there isn't reason for concern that this swing and impending tariffs may be correlated is not off base.
 
There is a point system. If you are a trans Native American disabled war veteran double amputee and a registered Democrat, then I think you get 100 points. Straight white dude is 0 points.
There is a real term for that - "intersectionality". Look it up.
 
The world isn’t ending. But it’s not accurate to say that 1300 down over two days is “recovering on queue”.

Of course “we’ll be fine” long term. But some extremely tough things for some businesses right now as a result of some decisions.

It's not even a correction yet. If you did any technical trading, you'd know this is not anything out of the ordinary. When the markets hit a trend line, they'll bounce. It usually happens like that.
 
wrong a mundo, close pretty much closed at the low point for the day. I'm not panicking as market swings have happened since time immemorium and is pretty pointless to watch everyday. But to say there isn't reason for concern that this swing and impending tariffs may be correlated is not off base.

Not wrong a mundo, but I appreciate the thoughts. I pay more attention to the NASDAQ and S&P500, not the Dow. And they didn't close at the lows for the day. As I said in another post, there was some profit taking in the last 15 minutes, which when you have a late rally like we had today, that is perfectly normal.

The market is strong and the news of the tariffs was already built into what we say yesterday and today. Volatility is still low at 23.5 so major swings aren't likely. I could start talking about resistance and Fibonacci lines, but that's not necessary on this forum. That's technical trading and the way market movers trade.
 
Well I would beg to disagree. Trump could denigrate anyone and it could stick. There isn’t anyone Republicans would run who could do same thing. Some tried and it made them look goofy at best.

The Democrats could run a guy like Mark Kelly from Arizona and he would come across as a decent person.

And remember this is in four years where the economy is suspect. So Vance runs and everyone points at him as part of the problem for four years. Rubio tries and the dem shows that Homer Simpson couch picture of him during Zelenskyy affair.

And frankly most other people that ran previously the Dems could just study what Trump said about each of them and bring it up again.

I appreciate your reply and understand your position. I disagree, but that's why we talk about these things.

I'm one who believes that the economy will be thriving, inflation will be way down, the illegal alien problem will be over, the debt will be reduced, foreign conflicts will be resolved (even though we have no business in any of them), and people will be happier with more money in their pockets again. That won't bode well for anyone on the Dem side trying to run. Add to that that the Dems don't really have a competent candidate and they are screwed.

We know Trump can't run again. I believe that JD Vance is actually a better candidate than Trump would be or was on substance. Trump is a showman and makes a splash. he makes deals. Vance is more common sense, hard-nosed and with strong morals and commitment. But that's just my opinion. The Dems have to reconstruct their entire party and rethink their platforms. That won't be easy when they're making fools of themselves and no one trusts them.
 
Not wrong a mundo, but I appreciate the thoughts. I pay more attention to the NASDAQ and S&P500, not the Dow. And they didn't close at the lows for the day. As I said in another post, there was some profit taking in the last 15 minutes, which when you have a late rally like we had today, that is perfectly normal.

The market is strong and the news of the tariffs was already built into what we say yesterday and today. Volatility is still low at 23.5 so major swings aren't likely. I could start talking about resistance and Fibonacci lines, but that's not necessary on this forum. That's technical trading and the way market movers trade.

you realize the S&P 500 has lost all of its post election gains, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheSpecialSauce
Well I would beg to disagree. Trump could denigrate anyone and it could stick. There isn’t anyone Republicans would run who could do same thing. Some tried and it made them look goofy at best.

The Democrats could run a guy like Mark Kelly from Arizona and he would come across as a decent person.

And remember this is in four years where the economy is suspect. So Vance runs and everyone points at him as part of the problem for four years. Rubio tries and the dem shows that Homer Simpson couch picture of him during Zelenskyy affair.

And frankly most other people that ran previously the Dems could just study what Trump said about each of them and bring it up again.
What if the economy is rolling?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT