Sadly, critical thinking is a skill beyond Swervin’s grasp.
I would argue Swerv is the one thinking critically and standing up for what is right and just.
Anyone okay with this morally reprehensible topic being condoned anywhere in America, is just following the progressive herd. Sadly, it takes guts for someone to take a stand against progressivism in this day and age. Because, as soon as one does, he's immediately subjected to ridicule and scorn...Really personal attacks too , not debate on the issue.
So far in this thread, Swerv is a dumb hick, a Nazi sympathizer, and a total moron.
Where is the substantive argument that this topic is suitable to be presented at a publicly funded university?