You're not wrong but it's probably equally absurd to argue that Pittsburgh and rural Kentucky are somehow homogeneous just because the Fed keeps changing how Appalachia is defined.
I am from No.Va. but I have several friends born in Allegheny County PA and I tell them don't be ashamed to have been born and raised in Appalachia.... in fact you should claim it -- in some places it is a "designated category" and can be used to your advantage in seeking assistance for loans, school admissions etc....
He’s got a point. People from Greene county and Fayette County in Pa are much more like West Virginia than the rest of PA.
I’ll go so far as to say that we should just go ahead and move the state lines to include those to areas as officially West Virginia.
Culturally, the perception of Appalachia is that of southern Appalachia. Pittsburgh is not a part of that. Geographically, of course Pittsburgh is in Appalachia, as is most of Pennsylvania outside of the areas near Philly, and near Erie, but northern Appalachia (most of Pennsylvania, southeastern Ohio, western Maryland, the southern stretch of western NY, and the northern third of WV) really doesn't have an identity. People are loathe to embrace the term Appalachian, because of the negative image of the southern regions. This is why people argue so much about what region Pittsburgh belongs to. Midwestern? Not really. Yeah, we share some things with Cleveland, but to me, Indy is quintessentially Midwestern, and I can't think of a city within 500 miles of us that is more unlike Pittsburgh than Indy. The idea of Pittsburgh, and Iowa being in the same region is even crazier, let alone the Plains States that are frequently considered to be part of the Midwest. Great Lakes? Flat, not a rowhouse to be found, wooden houses spaced far apart. Nah! East Coast? Too far inland. Maybe "interior east" is a good definition.The concept of Appalachia, as defined by the government, is completely different than what any sociologist would consider Appalachia to be. You're kind of confusing the conversation.
Tell them not to play Soccer or Lacrosse then since they have their own concussion problem.
Here is the top 5 sports for rate per Athletic Exposure.
- Rugby (4.18/1,000 AE)
- Ice hockey (1.20/1,000 AE)
- American football (0.53/1,000 AE)
- Lacrosse (0.24/1,000 AE)
- Football (or soccer) (0.23/1,000 AE)
Statistics on Diagnosed Concussions (NFL - IQVIA):
(Preseason and regular-season practices plus games)
2012 - 265
2013 - 244
2014 - 212
2015 - 279
2016 - 250
2017 - 291
I'm not sure that the numbers mean since they're not compared to anything except other years.
I would guess if you go back to 2000 the numbers are lower even though the game of football was just as dangerous, no rules to protect the head area, and the equipment wasn't as good as today.
It's the thing today to focus on concussions!
Going forward even with improved equipment, changed rules that protect the head area, concussion numbers will go up simply because it's a hot menu item these days even for announcers.
I would bet in every football game I watch the announcers say "he probably has a concussion" and the cameras pan to the concussion protocol area like it's now part of the game, and the announcers make their pronouncements? Lot's of grey when trying to figure out if a player has a concussion so most will take the safe route and report the incident as a concussion;
Since there’s no simple test for diagnosing a concussion, the process takes several steps:
- Interview to document the extent of any retrograde amnesia (loss of memory of the events immediately before the injury), loss of consciousness, or post-traumatic amnesia (loss of memory of events after the injury). Post-traumatic amnesia is the best indicator of a patient’s prognosis after a concussion, so this step is extremely important.
- Determination of the range and severity of post-concussion symptoms on the field. There are several standardized scales, the most common of which is the SCAT-2 (Sideline Concussion Assessment Tool). This scale inquires about symptoms, attention, and memory; asks about recent events in the game; and checks balance and coordination. (Download the SCAT-2.)
- Examination for any neurologic signs or symptoms: Tests of strength, sensation, reflexes, coordination, cranial nerve functions, mental status, and other neurologic functions to determine any serious injury to the brain.
Just relaying actual accurate statistics from the NFL not some random report saying .5 of every thousand football player gets a concussion. In fact if you Consider the size of the NFL and how many people play multiple years, and if I had time I would do that, I think you would see most likely close to 30% if not higher of every player in the NFL has had a concussion at one point in their life
The 2020 class reflects Rivals ratings of 52 4* players in Florida, 39 4* players in Texas vs 1 4* player in Pa. I got to believe that most of the top 10 kids in the state got to be 4* kids. Pa is definitely way down this year, but I believe there is a recruiting bias going where the money is also. With all that talent how could the Texas and Florida teams be so far down currently if the recruiting rankings were totally accurate? This isn't a 1 year trend.
Just relaying actual accurate statistics from the NFL not some random report saying .5 of every thousand football player gets a concussion. In fact if you Consider the size of the NFL and how many people play multiple years, and if I had time I would do that, I think you would see most likely close to 30% if not higher of every player in the NFL has had a concussion at one point in their life
Good post Buffett.I'm not sure that the numbers mean since they're not compared to anything except other years.
I would guess if you go back to 2000 the numbers are lower even though the game of football was just as dangerous, no rules to protect the head area, and the equipment wasn't as good as today.
It's the thing today to focus on concussions!
Going forward even with improved equipment, changed rules that protect the head area, concussion numbers will go up simply because it's a hot menu item these days even for announcers.
I would bet in every football game I watch the announcers say "he probably has a concussion" and the cameras pan to the concussion protocol area like it's now part of the game, and the announcers make their pronouncements? Lot's of grey when trying to figure out if a player has a concussion so most will take the safe route and report the incident as a concussion;
Since there’s no simple test for diagnosing a concussion, the process takes several steps:
- Interview to document the extent of any retrograde amnesia (loss of memory of the events immediately before the injury), loss of consciousness, or post-traumatic amnesia (loss of memory of events after the injury). Post-traumatic amnesia is the best indicator of a patient’s prognosis after a concussion, so this step is extremely important.
- Determination of the range and severity of post-concussion symptoms on the field. There are several standardized scales, the most common of which is the SCAT-2 (Sideline Concussion Assessment Tool). This scale inquires about symptoms, attention, and memory; asks about recent events in the game; and checks balance and coordination. (Download the SCAT-2.)
- Examination for any neurologic signs or symptoms: Tests of strength, sensation, reflexes, coordination, cranial nerve functions, mental status, and other neurologic functions to determine any serious injury to the brain.
I said it before and I will say it again, there are hundreds of thousands if not millions of former HS and college football players living normal productive lives. If parents are scared of letting their kids play HS football because of CTE based off the Mike Webster and Junior Seau's of the world then they lost proper prospective. They are looking at the outlier and thinking it is the norm because of the attention it gets.
I would guess if you go back to 2000 the numbers are lower even though the game of football was just as dangerous, no rules to protect the head area, and the equipment wasn't as good as today.
I think a lot of the CTE concussions have underlying issues. A majority of those, especially the NFL, that have concussion and later "CTE" also were involved in PED. Not saying that it's the main cause but that angle also needs to be addressed and looked at as well.I guess I'd agree if we had a metric for "normal productive lives". I'm kidding. But you can make the same argument about guys that broke a bone or tore something. They're normal and productive but quickly cite that old injury when they can't do something. Imagine if people had the same awareness of brain injuries?
The attention to head injuries was long overdue. I think assuming that every parent that hold their kids out of football because they're scared of CTE is an overly dramatic representation because most people still don't understand head injuries or have any clue about the urgency of treating one. You also have a sudden influx of "medical specialists" that sat in on a seminar somewhere and are suddenly going to capitalize on being the local guy who gets all of the referrals. It's scary that people are taking medical advice from a clown that knows next to nothing, telling a parent all the wrong things to do. So you end up with a lot of confusion, misinformation, and, of course, a lot of guys who are just terrified about the demise of football, spouting trash from the cheap seats. I don't understand the latter because football makes too much money to suddenly be deemed "too dangerous".
I think a lot of the CTE concussions have underlying issues. A majority of those, especially the NFL, that have concussion and later "CTE" also were involved in PED. Not saying that it's the main cause but that angle also needs to be addressed and looked at as well.
Noone knows if anyone has CTE until they're dead and examined.I think a lot of the CTE concussions have underlying issues. A majority of those, especially the NFL, that have concussion and later "CTE" also were involved in PED. Not saying that it's the main cause but that angle also needs to be addressed and looked at as well.
If you played football concussions are something that happens once in a while.
Most players will tell you that.
Lots of players in other sports have similar issues but football seems to be a focal point.
It's simply an occupational hazard.
The way to not get a concussion playing football is to not play football.
Lots of people make that choice and others don't.
There's risk in almost everything people do.
Some risks are greater than others.
People make lots of money playing football and most people end up just fine!
What do you suggest cancel all football?Ummmm ok
I guess I'd agree if we had a metric for "normal productive lives". I'm kidding. But you can make the same argument about guys that broke a bone or tore something. They're normal and productive but quickly cite that old injury when they can't do something. Imagine if people had the same awareness of brain injuries?
The attention to head injuries was long overdue. I think assuming that every parent that hold their kids out of football because they're scared of CTE is an overly dramatic representation because most people still don't understand head injuries or have any clue about the urgency of treating one. You also have a sudden influx of "medical specialists" that sat in on a seminar somewhere and are suddenly going to capitalize on being the local guy who gets all of the referrals. It's scary that people are taking medical advice from a clown that knows next to nothing, telling a parent all the wrong things to do. So you end up with a lot of confusion, misinformation, and, of course, a lot of guys who are just terrified about the demise of football, spouting trash from the cheap seats. I don't understand the latter because football makes too much money to suddenly be deemed "too dangerous".
I think the difficult part is everyone associates CTE injuries with big, light them up hits, and subsequent concussions.
I would think the continuous, long term ramifications of daily practice and games of linemen, starting with young children, the unavoidable head trauma, even if it is "light", but it is repetitive would be everybit as damaging as the head to head "JACK THEM UP" highlight hits.
This.....I don't know how you can legislate and control with rules.
Pittsburgh, Buffalo, Cleveland, Detroit and their surrounding areas aka The Rust Belt should be considered their own region. Pittsburgh has more in common with those cities than they do Philly and Baltimore and Detroit & Cleveland have more in common with Pittsburgh and Buffalo than places like Indianapolis, Chicago and the Twin Cities.Culturally, the perception of Appalachia is that of southern Appalachia. Pittsburgh is not a part of that. Geographically, of course Pittsburgh is in Appalachia, as is most of Pennsylvania outside of the areas near Philly, and near Erie, but northern Appalachia (most of Pennsylvania, southeastern Ohio, western Maryland, the southern stretch of western NY, and the northern third of WV) really doesn't have an identity. People are loathe to embrace the term Appalachian, because of the negative image of the southern regions. This is why people argue so much about what region Pittsburgh belongs to. Midwestern? Not really. Yeah, we share some things with Cleveland, but to me, Indy is quintessentially Midwestern, and I can't think of a city within 500 miles of us that is more unlike Pittsburgh than Indy. The idea of Pittsburgh, and Iowa being in the same region is even crazier, let alone the Plains States that are frequently considered to be part of the Midwest. Great Lakes? Flat, not a rowhouse to be found, wooden houses spaced far apart. Nah! East Coast? Too far inland. Maybe "interior east" is a good definition.
What do you suggest cancel all football?
They've changed rules to the point where its not really football anymore, the equipment is the best, so what's next?
Not play?
You never played the game!
That's obvious!
I played an maybe had one concussion, we had two kids who played LB in the largest conference in Eastern PA, both started three years, both were all conference players and had no concussions.
I coached youth football for ten years and can't remember many concussions and we were required to have certified medical staff at every game. They handled the injuries not the coaches.
It's big payola to be on the concussion list today!
I played football for Gateway High School.
Of course I don’t condone cancelling football, I’m on a football forum. I just don’t condone misleading statistics that don’t show a true picture.
I do condone taking the MONEY paid out on lawsuits to go to research in helmet and pad technology (and not just because I’m a materials engineer for helmet technologies), because the true way to solve problems is through root cause analysis and mitigation. It’s a violent sport so either stop playing, change the rules drastically... oooor the best option is to create protection that can take the massive head accelerations and disperse that trauma into the protective systems instead of into skulls.
I played football for Gateway High School.
Of course I don’t condone cancelling football, I’m on a football forum. I just don’t condone misleading statistics that don’t show a true picture.
I do condone taking the MONEY paid out on lawsuits to go to research in helmet and pad technology (and not just because I’m a materials engineer for helmet technologies), because the true way to solve problems is through root cause analysis and mitigation. It’s a violent sport so either stop playing, change the rules drastically... oooor the best option is to create protection that can take the massive head accelerations and disperse that trauma into the protective systems instead of into skulls.
This is pretty spot on but the problem I see are these guys today are too busy trying to make that big hit by leaving their feet constantly. NEVER in my life was I taught to leave my feet for a tackle. One way to curb it is institute "leave your feet to projectile" immediate ejection. No review just an ejection. Watch how fast leaving your feet stopsI like what you said, but lets add proper technique too. How many times do we see headhunters looking for the splash hit, instead of wrapping up and making a proper tackle? In actual game situations a proper form tackle is not realistic, but you can get closer to it than what is seen today. Too many guys work on getting bigger, faster, stronger instead of working on the craft in my opinion.
I like what you said, but lets add proper technique too. How many times do we see headhunters looking for the splash hit, instead of wrapping up and making a proper tackle? In actual game situations a proper form tackle is not realistic, but you can get closer to it than what is seen today. Too many guys work on getting bigger, faster, stronger instead of working on the craft in my opinion.
I think a lot of the CTE concussions have underlying issues. A majority of those, especially the NFL, that have concussion and later "CTE" also were involved in PED. Not saying that it's the main cause but that angle also needs to be addressed and looked at as well.
I do condone taking the MONEY paid out on lawsuits to go to research in helmet and pad technology (and not just because I’m a materials engineer for helmet technologies), because the true way to solve problems is through root cause analysis and mitigation. It’s a violent sport so either stop playing, change the rules drastically... oooor the best option is to create protection that can take the massive head accelerations and disperse that trauma into the protective systems instead of into skulls.
Moreover, this "manly" complaining about penalties and media attention to the issue is just petty and stupid. Reasonable human beings can sort through this stuff.
I wish i could agree with this but I can't. A) There is too much misinformation out there on both sides of any issue there is to talk about . B) IMO people become more UNreasonable every year. Look at this very board as an example. (BTW I am not claiming I am above this either)
Correct. And @steelcurtain55. is correct that psychiatric issues are prevalent in FB players. This is where CTE research is difficult. These things show up often enough that they can't be entirely dismissed as contributing factors so they get called out a lot as evidence that there isn't any proof. Mike Webster is a perfect example of a guy with a host of issues and had CTE. If you dismiss his brain damage because of substance abuse, you can do the same with a guy has an arthritic condition that's leftover from football who also abused drugs or alcohol. But it's not true.
It's still really early with all of the research. Big tobacco used to say cancer was just a sensational ploy, too.
It's an easy stretch guess to attribute football hits to mental issues among football players.
1.The NFL also leads the sporting world in Domestic Abusers/Domestic Abuse (familes, spouses, kids, unrelated females).
2.75% of NFL players end up broke or bankrupt after making fortunes.
3. Drug and alcohol use and abuse is rampant in the NFL.
Given these three characteristics of NFL players (above) I would think many arrive in the league with significant mental issues/impairments!
Football hits might be a factor for some but it isn't the major cause of mental behavioral issues in the NFL !
It's an easy stretch guess to attribute football hits to mental issues among football players.
1.The NFL also leads the sporting world in Domestic Abusers/Domestic Abuse (familes, spouses, kids, unrelated females).
2.75% of NFL players end up broke or bankrupt after making fortunes.
3. Drug and alcohol use and abuse is rampant in the NFL.
Given these three characteristics of NFL players (above) I would think many arrive in the league with significant mental issues/impairments!
Football hits might be a factor for some but it isn't the major cause of mental behavioral issues in the NFL !
Consider also that NFL players have significant histories of playing football before they arrive in the league, so it's not as if they haven't endured cumulative pre-NFL head trauma.
And pre NFL head trauma made NFL football players sports leaders in domestic abuse, bankruptcy, and drug and alcohol abuse?? LOL!
If football is such a terrible game why are you on this message board, why do you support football, watch football, or go to games.
It's destroying human life and you "do gooders" hate that right?
You should be working on protest signs right now and hitting the streets tomorrow! You can use the empty reverse side of you global warming protest signs or your no borders signs.
But you won't because its not!